IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Miguel Ramos

•

3 I've been through this exact situation. Just to add another perspective - check your divorce decree carefully. Some decrees have specific language about who claims the child in which years, and this can sometimes be used instead of Form 8332 if the decree was issued before 2009. If your decree was after 2009 though, you're absolutely going to need Form 8332 signed regardless of your ex's living situation. I found that explaining to my ex that signing the form doesn't reduce any benefits she receives sometimes helps.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

9 When you say "issued before 2009" - does that mean the original divorce decree or would modifications after 2009 still count? Our original divorce was in 2008 but we modified the child support arrangement in 2020.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

3 It's specifically about when the original agreement about claiming dependents was executed. If your original 2008 decree included the language about who claims the child for tax purposes, that part might still be valid without Form 8332. But if that arrangement was only added in the 2020 modification, then you would need Form 8332. The key thing is that pre-2009 agreements containing "unconditional declarations" about who claims the child can sometimes serve in place of Form 8332. However, the IRS has gotten stricter about this over the years, so having the signed form is always the safest approach regardless.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

13 Something nobody has mentioned - make sure if you do get the Form 8332 signed, that it's filled out completely and correctly. I had my ex sign it but she didn't include her SSN and the IRS rejected my dependent claim. Also, if your ex is receiving government benefits based on having a dependent child, she might be hesitant to sign because she thinks it will affect those benefits. It's worth explaining that Form 8332 only transfers the tax benefits, not anything related to public assistance programs.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

11 Do you know if the form has to be signed every single year? Or can you have them sign once for multiple tax years?

0 coins

Simon White

•

One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet - if you have a spouse and file jointly, your spouse can file an injured spouse claim (Form 8379) to get their portion of the refund protected from your debts. My husband had old student loans, and we were able to still get part of our refund by filing this form.

0 coins

Josef Tearle

•

That's really good to know but unfortunately I'm single so that won't help in my situation. Do you know if there's anything similar for individual filers? Like some kind of hardship exception?

0 coins

Simon White

•

There is a hardship exception you can request, but it's very specific to each type of debt. For federal student loans, you'd need to contact your loan servicer directly to request a hardship exception to the offset. They'll send you paperwork to prove extreme financial hardship. For state tax debts, you'd need to contact your state tax authority directly - each state has different criteria for hardship exceptions. Just be aware that these exceptions are pretty rare and usually require documented evidence of severe financial distress. Things like pending eviction, utility shutoffs, or medical emergencies sometimes qualify.

0 coins

Hugo Kass

•

Has anyone tried adjusting their withholding to get less of a refund? I got hit with an offset last year and my tax guy suggested changing my W-4 so I get more in each paycheck and less of a refund. That way there's less for them to take at tax time.

0 coins

I did this after getting burned by an offset two years in a row. Changed my withholding so I'm just about even at tax time instead of getting a big refund. Now I put the extra amount from each paycheck into a separate savings account. Even if I still owe the debt, at least I'm controlling when and how much I pay instead of having the whole lump sum taken.

0 coins

FYI for anyone using TPG - the timing can vary depending on your bank too. For me, once the amount showed in TPG, it took exactly 2 business days to change to "funded" and then another day for the money to actually hit my checking account. My credit union seems to process ACH transfers slower than some of the bigger banks.

0 coins

Any idea if there's a specific time of day TPG usually updates the status? I've been checking mine literally every hour lol.

0 coins

In my experience, TPG tends to update their systems overnight, so many status changes appear first thing in the morning. I noticed my status changed from "amount showing" to "funded" around 4am when I checked (I was up with a sick kid). The actual deposit to my bank account happened mid-afternoon the following day. If you filed with a major tax preparer that partners with TPG, you might also be able to set up text or email alerts for status changes so you don't have to keep checking manually.

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

Does anyone know why some people get their refunds direct from IRS while others go through TPG? This is my first year seeing this TPG stuff and I'm confused why my money has to go through a middleman at all???

0 coins

TPG usually handles your refund if you chose to have your tax preparation fees deducted from your refund instead of paying upfront. They're basically fronting the money for your preparation fees, then getting paid back when your refund comes.

0 coins

Esteban Tate

•

Something important nobody's mentioned yet - make sure you're calculating the loss correctly. It's not just what it costs to replace the stolen/damaged items. For tax purposes, casualty loss is the lesser of: 1) Your adjusted basis in the property (usually what you paid plus improvements) 2) The decrease in fair market value caused by the casualty/theft So if you bought a couch 5 years ago for $1000 that's now only worth $400 (before theft), your casualty loss would be $400, not $1000. This catches a lot of people off guard.

0 coins

So does that mean if something old gets stolen, you basically get no deduction because it was already depreciated in value? Like if thieves take a 10-year-old TV that's practically worthless now but costs $500 to replace?

0 coins

Esteban Tate

•

That's exactly right - and it's why casualty losses often end up being less than people expect. If your 10-year-old TV had depreciated to a fair market value of only $50 before it was stolen, that's your deduction amount (not the $500 replacement cost). However, for the business/rental portion of your property, you've likely been taking depreciation deductions already, so your adjusted basis should align more closely with the current value. This is actually one advantage of the business portion of casualty losses - they're generally calculated based on the depreciated value that you've been reporting for tax purposes all along.

0 coins

Random but important tip: if your deductible exceeds your loss so you don't file an insurance claim, still document EVERYTHING as if you were filing. Take dated photos, get written repair estimates, and keep all receipts. The IRS is super picky about casualty loss documentation. I got audited for a rental property casualty loss and they wanted proof I tried to recover through insurance first before claiming the tax deduction. Luckily I had emails with my insurance agent discussing the claim and how it was below my deductible.

0 coins

What if you don't have before photos of everything? My storage shed at my rental got broken into last month and I honestly don't have pictures of what was in there before.

0 coins

Is it normal to file 83% of your business expenses as subcontractor costs for a marketing agency?

I've got a bit of a headache right now trying to figure out my S-Corp tax situation and wondering if anyone has been through this. My situation: I run a one-person digital marketing agency that I started as a single-member LLC in 2022, but my accountant convinced me to switch to S-Corp status this year to save on self-employment taxes. While I'm the only W2 employee, a huge chunk of my business involves hiring freelancers and specialized agencies to deliver client work - web developers, graphic designers, copywriters, SEO experts, social media specialists, etc. I mainly find these folks through platforms like Upwork or partner with other boutique agencies. Here's where things got weird - my bookkeeper and I were categorizing expenses for my 1120S filing, and we've hit a major disagreement between her and my tax preparer. When I was filing Schedule C in previous years, we categorized all these freelancer/subcontractor expenses as "Contract Labor" (about 83% of my total business expenses). Now my tax preparer and bookkeeper are arguing over whether this is normal/acceptable for a service-based business like mine to have such a high percentage of expenses in this single category, or if I should be breaking these costs down differently on the 1120S. Has anyone else with a similar business model encountered this? Is it a red flag to list 83% of expenses as subcontractor costs? Should I be worried about audit risk?

I'm an S-Corp owner in web development and have similar percentages (about 75% to contractors). One thing that helped me was adding more detail to my "Other Deductions" statement for the 1120S. Instead of just listing "Subcontractor Expenses" as one line item, I broke it down by project type or service category: - Web Development Contractors - Design Services - Content Creation - Digital Marketing Services This approach satisfied my accountant who was worried about the large single-category expense. It doesn't change your bottom line, but it does give more context to anyone reviewing the return and shows the varied nature of the contracted services.

0 coins

That's a really smart approach! I could definitely break mine down similarly into categories like social media, SEO, content development, etc. Did your accountant mention if this categorization approach reduces audit risk at all, or is it more about clarity?

0 coins

It's mostly about clarity and transparency rather than directly reducing audit risk. My accountant explained that if your return ever gets reviewed, having clearly categorized expenses makes it easier for the reviewer to understand your business model without requiring additional documentation or explanation. Basically, it doesn't necessarily make you less likely to be selected for review, but it can make the review process smoother if it happens. The categorization also helped me better understand my own business spending patterns and make more strategic decisions about which service areas were most profitable.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

Has anyone used QuickBooks for tracking these contractor expenses? I'm having a nightmare time trying to categorize everything properly for my marketing business. Their default categories don't seem to fit well with our business model.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

I use QB for my consulting business and had the same issue. What worked for me was creating custom sub-accounts under the main expense categories. For example, under "Contractors" I have sub-accounts for different types (design, development, writing, etc.). Makes reporting way cleaner and gives me better insights into where the money's going.

0 coins

Prev1...37023703370437053706...5643Next