This is actually pretty common with state tax systems! The refund processing and status tracking systems often aren't synced in real-time. Nebraska's system is known for having delays between when checks are issued and when their online portal reflects the updated status. Since you already have your physical check, you're all good - just deposit it normally. The online status will eventually catch up, sometimes taking weeks after you've already received and deposited your refund. No need to worry about any discrepancies here!

Glad to hear others have experienced this too! I had the exact same situation with my Colorado state refund a couple years back - got my check on a Thursday but the state website didn't update until almost 3 weeks later. These government systems are notorious for being out of sync. As long as you have that physical check in hand, you're golden. Just deposit it and don't stress about the website status - it'll update eventually (or maybe it won't, but it doesn't matter since you already got paid). The important thing is your refund processed correctly and arrived way faster than their estimated 30-day timeline!

Have you considered composite returns? Some states allow partnerships to file a single composite return on behalf of all nonresident partners, which can dramatically simplify your filing burden. Not all states offer this option, but many do. The requirements vary by state, but essentially the partnership pays tax on behalf of the partners for that state's sourced income. It's typically a flat rate and while sometimes higher than individual rates, the administrative convenience can be worth it. I manage several partnerships with similar multi-state issues, and we've reduced our state filings by about 60% using composite returns where available.

I run into this issue every year with my investment partnerships. Here's my practical approach that's worked for 15+ years: 1. Always file in your home state plus any state with income over $1,000 2. File in "aggressive" states regardless of amount (CA, NY, MA, NJ, IL) 3. For states with income under $500, I keep documentation showing the amount but don't file unless they contact me 4. For amounts between $500-$1,000, I make a case-by-case decision based on the state's reputation Following this approach, I've only had two states ever contact me about non-filing (Oregon and Connecticut), and in both cases, the penalties were minimal compared to the preparation costs I saved over the years. Just know that technically you're supposed to file everywhere you have income, so this approach does have some risk. But from a practical standpoint, the tax departments in many states are too understaffed to pursue very small amounts.

path act got us all stressed like 🤡

Your transcript looks good! Since you filed Jan 29th and it processed Feb 25th, you're actually past the PATH Act hold period (which typically ends mid-February). Those April dates on codes 766 and 768 are just system placeholders - they don't mean you have to wait until April. With cycle 20250605, you should see movement on Wednesdays/Thursdays. I'd expect your 846 refund code to show up within the next week or two. No need for an 806 code first - you can go straight to 846 with your refund amount of $5,755!

I might be able to help you with this one. I'm a tax preparer who has probably completed hundreds of 8962 forms over the years. In most cases, your tax software should actually handle the calculations for you once you input your 1095-A information correctly. The software should ask for the monthly premium amounts, SLCSP (Second Lowest Cost Silver Plan) amounts, and advance payment amounts from your 1095-A. If you've already entered that information and the software is still asking you to complete the 8962 manually, there might be something unusual about your situation - perhaps a mid-year change in coverage or family size. If you can share a bit more about your specific situation (without revealing personal details), I could possibly provide more targeted advice.

I went through this exact same struggle when I first moved here! The 8962 was like trying to decode a foreign language. What finally clicked for me was realizing that Part I (the household income calculation) is the foundation for everything else - if you get that wrong, the rest falls apart. A few things that saved me: First, make absolutely sure you're using the right Federal Poverty Line table for your state and family size. Second, when calculating your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI), don't forget to include any untaxed foreign income if applicable - that tripped me up my first year. Third, if your income changed significantly from what you estimated when you enrolled, that's totally normal and the form accounts for it. The reconciliation part in Part II is basically just comparing what the government gave you in advance (Column C from your 1095-A) versus what you actually qualified for based on your real income. If you got too much help, you pay some back. If you got too little, you get more as a credit. One last tip: if you're still stuck after trying all the suggestions here, consider calling the IRS directly with your forms in hand. Yes, the wait times are brutal, but sometimes talking through it with an agent while looking at your actual numbers makes everything suddenly make sense. Good luck!

Anyone know what the realistic chances are of actually getting a whistleblower award? My brother-in-law claims he got like 15% of what the IRS collected after his report, but that sounds like BS to me.

Based on my experience working in tax compliance, your evidence sounds pretty solid for a Form 211 submission. Emails discussing "keeping it off the books" combined with screenshots of accounting discrepancies can be very compelling evidence - the IRS looks for patterns that show intentional tax evasion rather than just mistakes. A few key points for your documentation: - Organize everything chronologically to show the pattern over time - Include dates, amounts, and context for each piece of evidence - Your $450K estimate is fine - show your methodology for how you arrived at that figure - Keep detailed notes about those overheard conversations (who, when, where, what was said) The IRS doesn't expect you to have perfect proof - that's their job to investigate. Your role is providing substantial information that gives them a starting point. From what you've described, you definitely have enough to warrant filing. Just make sure you're only using information you had legitimate access to through your normal job duties to avoid any retaliation issues. Good luck with your submission!