


Ask the community...
You're absolutely right to question this! Since you only work with independent contractors and have no W-2 employees, you typically don't need to file Form 940 (FUTA) or Form 941 (quarterly employment taxes). These forms are specifically for reporting employment taxes on actual employees who receive wages with tax withholdings. Your approach of issuing 1099-NECs to contractors is exactly what you should be doing. That's your main tax reporting requirement for independent contractor payments. However, I'd strongly echo what others have mentioned about being meticulous with worker classification documentation. The IRS does scrutinize businesses that exclusively use contractors, so make sure you can demonstrate that your working relationships truly meet the independence criteria: - Keep signed contracts that specify independent contractor status and focus on project deliverables rather than daily work supervision - Document that contractors set their own schedules and work methods - Maintain records showing they use their own equipment and tools - If possible, keep evidence that they work for other clients (this really strengthens the independence argument) - Save communications that show contractors making independent business decisions I'd recommend doing an annual review of each contractor relationship using the IRS's behavioral control, financial control, and relationship type factors. This helps you catch any situations that might be drifting toward an employment relationship before they become problems. Your tax software asks about these forms because most businesses eventually hire employees, but for now you can safely skip those sections and focus on getting your 1099s filed correctly!
@Hailey O'Leary This is such a comprehensive breakdown - thank you! As someone new to business ownership, I really appreciate how you've laid out the specific documentation requirements. The point about keeping communications that show contractors making independent business decisions is something I hadn't thought of before, but it makes total sense. I'm definitely going to implement that annual review process you mentioned. After reading through all the experiences shared in this thread, especially the audit stories, I realize how important it is to be proactive about this stuff rather than just hoping everything works out. One question - when you mention keeping evidence that contractors work for other clients, what's the best way to document that without being intrusive? I don't want to pry into their other business relationships, but I understand why that evidence would be valuable for supporting the independence classification. Should I just ask them to confirm in writing that they maintain other clients, or is there a more formal approach? This whole discussion has been incredibly eye-opening. I had no idea worker classification could be such a complex issue when I started my business!
Just wanted to add my perspective as someone who went through this same confusion when starting my business. You're definitely on the right track - no employees means no Forms 940 or 941 required. Those are strictly for payroll tax reporting on W-2 employees. Since you're already handling the 1099-NEC filings correctly, you're covering your main obligation for contractor payments. The key is just making sure your contractor relationships stay genuinely independent. One thing that's helped me is keeping a simple annual documentation checklist for each contractor - things like confirming they still work for other clients, reviewing that our contracts focus on deliverables rather than daily supervision, and noting that they continue to use their own equipment and set their own schedules. It takes maybe 15 minutes per contractor each year, but gives me peace of mind that I can support the classification if questions ever come up. Your tax software will keep asking about those forms because most businesses do eventually hire employees, but you can confidently skip those sections for now. Just keep doing what you're doing with proper contractor documentation and 1099 filings!
@Adaline Wong That annual documentation checklist idea is brilliant! As someone just getting started with my first business, I ve'been feeling overwhelmed by all the compliance requirements, but breaking it down into a simple 15-minute annual review per contractor makes it feel much more manageable. I really appreciate how you ve'emphasized that this is about supporting the classification rather than being paranoid. Reading through everyone s'experiences in this thread has shown me that proper documentation isn t'just bureaucratic busy work - it s'genuinely protecting my business from potential problems down the road. Your point about the tax software continuing to ask about those forms is reassuring too. I was starting to second-guess myself every time I saw those prompts, wondering if I was missing something critical. It s'good to know that s'just because the software assumes most businesses will eventually have employees. Thanks for sharing such practical, actionable advice. This whole discussion has given me a much clearer roadmap for managing my contractor relationships properly while staying compliant with IRS requirements.
Congratulations on the huge win! That's life-changing money. A few additional considerations for your situation: 1. **Estimated Tax Payments**: With a 350k windfall, you'll likely owe substantial taxes for this year. Consider making quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid underpayment penalties. 2. **State Taxes**: Don't forget about state income tax implications - some states have no income tax while others could take a significant chunk. 3. **Professional Help**: Given the complexity and size of this win, investing in a CPA who specializes in cryptocurrency is essential. The potential tax savings from proper planning will far exceed their fees. 4. **Record Keeping**: Document everything - the date you received the crypto, the fair market value at that time, wallet addresses, etc. You'll need this for accurate reporting and basis calculations. 5. **Consider Timing**: If you're planning to sell any of the ETH, timing matters for capital gains treatment. Holding for over a year gets you long-term capital gains rates. The good news is that with proper planning and professional guidance, you can minimize your tax burden legally while staying compliant with IRS requirements.
This is really comprehensive advice! I'm new to dealing with crypto taxes and didn't even think about estimated quarterly payments. Since I won this in March, am I already behind on the Q1 payment? And do you have any suggestions for finding a CPA who actually understands crypto? I've called a few local ones and they all seem pretty clueless about how to handle cryptocurrency winnings specifically.
For Q1 estimated payments, the deadline was April 15th, so if you won in March you may have missed it depending on when exactly you received the crypto. But don't panic - you can still make the Q2 payment by June 15th to get caught up. The IRS generally wants you to pay 25% of your expected annual tax liability each quarter. For finding a crypto-savvy CPA, I'd recommend checking with the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) directory and filtering for those who list cryptocurrency or digital assets as specialties. You can also look for CPAs who are members of professional crypto organizations like the Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (ACAMS) or who have completed continuing education courses specifically on cryptocurrency taxation. Many of the good ones are now advertising their crypto expertise on their websites since it's becoming such a common need. Another approach is to contact larger accounting firms in your area - they're more likely to have someone on staff who deals with crypto regularly. Don't be afraid to ask potential CPAs directly about their experience with large crypto winnings and sweepstakes prizes specifically.
Just a heads up - make sure you're calculating the fair market value correctly for the date you received the ETH. I made the mistake of using the value from when I first saw the notification email rather than when the crypto was actually deposited into my wallet, and it caused a mess with my basis calculations. Also, something that really helped me was setting aside about 40% of the winnings immediately for taxes. With federal income tax, state taxes (depending on your state), and potentially self-employment tax if the platform classified you as receiving payment for services, the tax bill can be brutal. I learned this the hard way when I spent too much of my crypto winnings and then got hit with a massive tax bill. One more thing - if you're thinking about that property investment for tax benefits, look into cost segregation studies for rental properties. They can accelerate depreciation deductions in the first few years, which might help offset some of your current year income. But definitely run this by a qualified tax professional first - the IRS scrutinizes large deductions following big income years.
This is really solid advice about setting aside money for taxes immediately. I'm curious about the self-employment tax aspect you mentioned - would sweepstakes winnings really be subject to SE tax? I thought those were typically classified as "other income" rather than earnings from services. The distinction seems important since SE tax adds another 15.3% on top of regular income tax rates. Also, the cost segregation study suggestion is interesting. Do you know roughly what the upfront cost is for one of those studies, and what kind of property values make them worthwhile? With a 350k windfall, investing in real estate seems smart but I want to make sure the tax benefits actually pencil out after accounting for all the fees and studies involved.
As a newcomer to this community, I've been deeply troubled by the Innovation Refunds story and what it reveals about the broader ERC industry. What's particularly concerning to me is how this situation demonstrates a complete breakdown in professional standards and ethics. The WSJ article shows how David Carrier and RJon Robins essentially created a pipeline from inexperienced attorneys to processing complex tax credits worth billions of dollars. This wasn't just poor business practice - it was a systematic exploitation of both the legal profession and struggling small businesses. What really bothers me is the timing aspect. These companies swooped in during the height of the pandemic when small business owners were desperate for relief and likely to trust anyone offering legitimate-sounding help. The psychological manipulation involved in targeting vulnerable businesses with promises of "free money" and "zero risk" feels particularly predatory. I've been wondering about the broader accountability here. While business owners who received improper credits will face consequences from the IRS, what happens to the companies and individuals who created this mess? Are there professional disciplinary actions for the attorneys involved? Criminal liability for the organizers? The Innovation Refunds case feels like it should be a watershed moment for how we regulate companies that market tax services to small businesses. The current system clearly failed to protect vulnerable business owners from sophisticated bad actors.
Your point about accountability is really important and something I've been thinking about too. It seems like there's a huge disparity between the consequences facing small business owners versus the people who created this mess in the first place. From what I've been reading, most of the focus has been on businesses having to repay credits and face potential penalties, but there's been relatively little discussion about consequences for the companies like Innovation Refunds that made millions promoting questionable claims. The WSJ article mentioned they took 15-20% fees on these refunds - that's potentially hundreds of millions in revenue from what appears to be systematically problematic advice. The professional disciplinary angle you raised is particularly interesting. If attorneys with no tax experience were giving complex tax advice that resulted in improper claims, that seems like it could violate professional conduct rules. But I haven't seen any reporting about state bar investigations or disciplinary actions. Your point about this being a "watershed moment" resonates with me. The scale of this problem - potentially $23-46 billion in improper claims according to earlier comments - suggests we need much stronger oversight of companies marketing tax services. The current system clearly allowed sophisticated bad actors to operate with minimal oversight while targeting the most vulnerable businesses. It's frustrating that the people who were supposedly being helped are the ones facing the most serious consequences.
As someone new to this community, I've been following the Innovation Refunds situation with a mix of concern and curiosity about how widespread this problem really is. The WSJ article was eye-opening, but reading through this discussion has been even more illuminating about the real-world impact on small businesses. What strikes me most is the pattern that emerges from everyone's experiences: cold calls promising guaranteed money, high-pressure sales tactics, upfront fees, and claims processing by people with no relevant expertise. It's like these companies had a playbook for exploiting desperate small business owners. I'm particularly interested in the timeline aspect that several people have mentioned. It sounds like many of these questionable claims were processed in 2022-2023, which means we're just now seeing the fallout as the IRS begins serious enforcement. For businesses that received these refunds, the window for voluntary correction seems to be closing as scrutiny increases. One thing I haven't seen discussed much is whether there might be class action potential here. If Innovation Refunds and similar companies systematically misrepresented qualification requirements to thousands of businesses, resulting in widespread improper claims, it seems like there could be grounds for legal action to recover the fees paid and potentially other damages. Has anyone looked into whether these companies might face legal consequences beyond just losing their business model? The scale of potential harm here seems significant enough to warrant serious regulatory and legal response.
I went through this exact same process last year with my SPX options and futures trading! The confusion is totally understandable - TurboTax's interface for 1256 contracts isn't very intuitive. Here's what worked for me: After searching for "Form 6781" and selecting "Yes" for having 1256 contracts, the key is to use the summary amounts from your 1099-B rather than trying to enter individual trades. Your broker should have a specific section for 1256 contracts that shows your total gains/losses. One thing that tripped me up initially was making sure I didn't double-enter these amounts in both the regular capital gains section AND Form 6781. The 1256 contracts should ONLY go in Form 6781, not in the regular stock trading sections. With $14,500 in realized profits, you'll benefit from that 60/40 split (60% long-term, 40% short-term) regardless of how long you held the positions. TurboTax will calculate this automatically once you enter your totals correctly. The "marked to market" question should be "No" unless you've made a special trader election with the IRS, which most retail traders haven't done.
This is really helpful, thank you! I'm new to trading these types of contracts and was getting overwhelmed by all the different forms and rules. One quick follow-up question - when you say "summary amounts from your 1099-B," should I be looking for a specific box number or section? My 1099-B has a lot of different sections and I want to make sure I'm pulling the right numbers for Form 6781. Also, does it matter if some of my SPX trades were spreads (like iron condors) versus single options, or do they all get treated the same way for 1256 purposes?
Great question about the 1099-B sections! You'll want to look for a section specifically labeled something like "Section 1256 Contracts" or "Regulated Futures Contracts" - it's usually in a separate section from your regular stock trades. Some brokers put it at the bottom of the 1099-B or on a supplemental page. If you can't find a dedicated section, look for trades that are specifically marked as "1256" in the description. For your SPX spreads like iron condors, they absolutely get the same 1256 treatment as single options! The IRS doesn't differentiate between simple and complex strategies when it comes to Section 1256 contracts. Each leg of your iron condor that involves SPX options will be treated as a 1256 contract. Your broker should have already calculated the net profit/loss from all the legs combined, so you just need the total amounts. One tip: if your broker didn't break out 1256 contracts clearly, you can manually identify them by looking for trades with underlying symbols like SPX, VIX, RUT, or any futures contracts. These all qualify for 1256 treatment regardless of the strategy complexity.
I just went through this exact situation a few months ago when filing my taxes for last year's SPX options trading. The Form 6781 process in TurboTax definitely isn't as straightforward as it should be! One thing that really helped me was double-checking my broker's classification of the trades. I found that my broker had actually missed categorizing a few of my SPX trades as 1256 contracts on the initial 1099-B, but they issued a corrected version later. You might want to verify that all your SPX options and futures are properly marked as Section 1256 contracts on your forms. Also, keep in mind that if you have any wash sale adjustments related to your 1256 contracts, those will need special handling since the wash sale rules work differently for Section 1256 contracts compared to regular securities. The good news is that once you get past the initial confusion, the 60/40 tax treatment actually works out pretty favorably compared to short-term capital gains rates on regular trades. With your $14,500 profit, you'll definitely benefit from having 60% of that treated as long-term gains. If you run into any snags with the TurboTax interface, don't hesitate to reach out - this community has been really helpful for navigating these more complex trading tax situations!
Thanks for mentioning the wash sale adjustments - that's something I hadn't considered! I did have some losing positions that I closed and then reopened similar positions within 30 days. How exactly do wash sales work differently for 1256 contracts? Do I need to make manual adjustments in TurboTax, or does the software handle it automatically when I enter the corrected basis amounts from my 1099-B? Also, you mentioned checking for corrected 1099-B forms - my broker did issue a supplemental statement a few weeks after the original. Should I be combining both forms when entering the totals into Form 6781, or does the supplemental replace the original entirely?
Teresa Boyd
I completely understand the frustration! I went through something similar last year during my own financial struggles. From my experience with Chime and tax refunds, here's what I've learned: the timing really depends on when the IRS actually processes and releases your refund, not just when you filed. Chime typically gets it to you 1-3 days before the official IRS date, but that "up to 6 days early" marketing is mainly for regular paychecks with predictable schedules. The most important thing is to check your IRS transcript online - look for the 846 code which shows your actual refund date. That's when the IRS will send the money to Chime, and then Chime usually deposits it 1-3 days before that date. Also remember that if you claimed EITC or Child Tax Credit, there's an additional hold period that can delay things. I know it's stressful waiting, especially when you're dealing with divorce expenses and catching up on bills. Try to resist checking WMR every hour (easier said than done, I know!) and focus on that transcript date instead. The money will come! š
0 coins
NebulaNinja
ā¢@Teresa Boyd Thank you so much for this thoughtful response! It s'really comforting to know I m'not alone in dealing with financial stress while waiting for a refund. I m'definitely going to check my transcript for that 846 code - I had no idea that was the key thing to look for! Quick question: when you say 1-3 days before the transcript date, does that include weekends? Like if my 846 date falls on a Wednesday, could I potentially see it in my Chime account as early as Sunday or Monday? I m'trying to plan my bill payments and want to be realistic about the timing. Thanks again for the encouragement - it really helps to hear from someone who s'been through similar struggles! š
0 coins
Connor Murphy
I've been banking with Chime for my tax refunds for the past two years, and I totally get the anxiety of waiting! Here's what I've experienced: Chime's "early deposit" for tax refunds is usually 1-4 days earlier than traditional banks, but it's not as predictable as their paycheck early deposit feature. The key is understanding that the IRS releases refunds in batches on specific days (usually Wednesdays), and Chime gets notified when your money is coming before they actually receive it. That's when they deposit it early. For tracking, definitely check your IRS transcript online rather than just WMR - look for code 846 which shows your actual refund date. Once you see that, you can expect Chime to deposit it 1-3 business days before that date (business days being the key - weekends don't count). Also, since you mentioned your divorce situation - I'm sorry you're going through that financial stress. Just make sure your bank account info is correct in your filing since any name/account changes from the divorce could potentially cause delays. The refund will come though - try not to check every hour (I know it's hard!). Set up Chime's mobile notifications so you'll know the moment it hits your account! š
0 coins