IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I've been following this thread and wanted to add something that might help with the transcript confusion - the IRS actually has a pretty detailed publication (Pub 5307) that explains how to read wage and income transcripts. It maps out exactly what each code means and which boxes on your W-2 they correspond to. What really helped me when I was in a similar situation was printing out both the transcript and this publication, then going line by line to make sure I understood what each entry meant before entering anything on my tax forms. The transcript codes can be really confusing (like "WH-FIT" for federal income tax withheld), but once you have the decoder it becomes much clearer. You can download Pub 5307 directly from the IRS website. It's only about 6 pages long but it saved me from making some costly mistakes when I was trying to file with just my transcript. Just thought this might be useful for anyone else dealing with transcript interpretation issues!

0 coins

Paolo Romano

•

This is incredibly helpful! I had no idea the IRS published a guide specifically for reading transcripts. I've been staring at mine for hours trying to figure out what "WH-MCARE" and "WH-SS" meant - now I know those are Medicare and Social Security withholdings. Just downloaded Pub 5307 and you're right, it's like having a translation key. For anyone else struggling with the transcript codes, this publication breaks down every single abbreviation and shows you exactly where each piece of information would appear on an actual W-2. Definitely wish I had found this earlier in the process! Thanks for sharing this resource.

0 coins

As someone who's dealt with this exact situation multiple times, I want to emphasize that you're definitely on the right track with the wage and income transcript - it's completely acceptable for federal filing and contains all the key information the IRS needs. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that if you're really pressed for time and can't get your state withholding information sorted out, you might want to consider filing your federal return first using the transcript data, then handling your state return separately once you track down that information. Many states have later deadlines than the federal April 15th deadline anyway. Also, for future reference, I'd highly recommend setting up an online account with your state's tax agency if they offer one. Many states now provide digital access to your withholding information similar to how the IRS provides transcripts. It's one of those things that seems obvious in hindsight but can really save you in situations like this. The main thing is don't panic - you have several good options here and the IRS understands that sometimes documents get lost. The transcript route is legitimate and widely used by tax professionals when clients are missing their W-2s.

0 coins

Romeo Quest

•

This is such great advice about filing federal and state separately! I'm actually in a very similar boat to the original poster - lost my W-2 and have been stressing about the deadline. I managed to get my wage and income transcript but was getting overwhelmed trying to solve everything at once. Your point about state deadlines being different is something I hadn't considered. I just checked and my state (California) actually has until April 15th too, but knowing I can tackle them as separate problems makes this feel much more manageable. I'm definitely going to set up that state tax agency account you mentioned once I get through this year's filing. It's one of those "why didn't I think of that sooner" moments. Thanks for the reassurance that the transcript route is legitimate - I was worried I was somehow doing something wrong by not having the physical W-2.

0 coins

Chloe Zhang

•

I've been following this thread with great interest as I'm currently dealing with a similar nightmare scenario. The IRS rejected my 2021 1120-S claiming they have no record of my Form 2553, despite having filed it properly and operating as an S-corp for years. What really caught my attention in this discussion is the combination of approaches mentioned - the systematic documentation requests (Business Master File Account Transcript, Form 4506-T) paired with the newer tools like taxr.ai for analysis and Claimyr for actually getting through to the right IRS department. I'm particularly intrigued by Hattie's point about requesting the complete account transcript. In my case, the IRS has been processing my quarterly employment tax returns as an S-corp for three years, but suddenly claims they have no record of the election for my annual return. This system inconsistency seems to be exactly what these transcripts would reveal. For dissolved entities like yours, I'd also suggest checking if your state has any pending tax issues that might be creating federal complications. In some cases, state-level entity problems can cause the IRS to question or override federal elections. The timeline pressure you're under makes this even more critical. Based on what I've read here, I'd probably pursue multiple approaches simultaneously - file for the transcripts and protective claim while using one of the callback services to get through to the Business Entity department directly. The worst thing would be to let deadlines pass while waiting for one approach to work.

0 coins

This is such a comprehensive approach, Chloe! The point about state-level entity issues potentially causing federal complications is something I hadn't considered at all. Since my company was dissolved at the state level in 2022, there could definitely be some interconnected issues that are confusing the IRS systems. Your strategy of pursuing multiple approaches simultaneously makes a lot of sense given the time constraints. I'm thinking of requesting the Business Master File Account Transcript and Form 4506-T first to get the documentation foundation, then using Claimyr to get through to the actual Business Entity department with that evidence in hand. The inconsistency you mentioned about employment taxes being processed as S-corp while annual returns are rejected is exactly what I'm seeing too. It's almost like different IRS departments are looking at completely different databases. Having the complete account transcript should reveal these system disconnects. I'm also going to check on any potential state-level complications from the dissolution process. You're right that this could be creating additional federal issues that I haven't even thought about yet. Thanks for the multi-pronged strategy suggestion - at this point, I need to throw everything at this problem before I run out of time!

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

I've been dealing with IRS entity classification issues for years as a tax professional, and this thread has some excellent advice. I want to emphasize a few critical points for your situation: First, the fact that your original 1120-S was accepted is huge evidence in your favor. The IRS has internal controls that should have rejected it immediately if there was truly no S-corp election on file. This acceptance creates what we call "administrative estoppel" - they can't now claim they never recognized your status when they previously processed returns based on that status. Second, since your company is dissolved, you're working against some strict deadlines. The IRS generally allows 3 years and 75 days from the original due date to correct entity elections, but dissolution can complicate this. I'd strongly recommend filing Form 9100 (Application for Extension of Time) immediately while you gather your documentation. This preserves your rights to retroactive relief even if the standard deadlines have passed. Third, beyond the excellent suggestions about transcripts and callback services, consider requesting a copy of your complete IRS file using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Sometimes documents exist in the system but aren't showing up in standard searches. A FOIA request forces them to do a comprehensive search. The combination approach mentioned by others is spot-on - use the systematic documentation requests to build your case while using callback services to get to the right people who can actually resolve it. Time is your enemy here, so parallel processing is essential.

0 coins

This professional perspective is incredibly valuable, Paolo! The concept of "administrative estoppel" is exactly what I needed to understand - the fact that they previously accepted my 1120-S should legally prevent them from now claiming they never recognized my S-corp status. Your point about filing Form 9100 immediately is crucial. I've been so focused on gathering documentation that I hadn't considered the need to formally preserve my rights to retroactive relief while I'm fighting this. Given that the company was dissolved in 2022, I'm definitely cutting it close on those deadlines. The FOIA request suggestion is brilliant - I hadn't thought about documents potentially existing in their system but not showing up in standard searches. That could explain why different agents are giving me completely different information about what's in my file. I'm going to take your parallel processing approach: file Form 9100 this week to preserve my rights, submit the FOIA request and transcript requests to build my documentation case, and use Claimyr to get through to the Business Entity department with all this evidence. The administrative estoppel argument about their previous acceptance of my 1120-S could be the key legal point that finally resolves this mess. Thank you for the professional insight - it's reassuring to have confirmation that there are legitimate legal principles working in my favor here, not just bureaucratic workarounds.

0 coins

Ethan Brown

•

Did you check if they're withholding for things besides federal income tax? My big checks always look like they're withholding too much but then I realize they're also taking out Social Security (6.2%), Medicare (1.45%), state income tax, and sometimes local taxes too. All that together can easily push the total withholding percentage into the 20-30% range even if your federal rate is only 12%.

0 coins

This! People forget about FICA taxes. Social Security and Medicare together are 7.65% off the top before you even get to income tax.

0 coins

The $5,594.79 withholding on your $25,430.88 paycheck is likely correct if this includes bonus and backpay as you mentioned in your reply below. Here's the breakdown: supplemental wages (bonuses, backpay, commissions) are subject to a flat 22% federal withholding rate regardless of your actual tax bracket. This is an IRS requirement, not an error by your payroll department. So if your entire $25,430.88 was treated as supplemental wages, the federal withholding would be about $5,595 (22% Ɨ $25,430.88), which matches almost exactly what was withheld. You'll get back any excess when you file your 2025 tax return if your actual tax liability is lower than what was withheld. For future reference, regular salary is withheld based on your W-4 and projected annual income, but bonuses and other supplemental payments get the flat 22% treatment to simplify payroll processing.

0 coins

Thanks Paolo, this is super helpful! I had no idea about the flat 22% rule for supplemental wages. So basically any time I get a bonus or commission on top of my regular salary, they're going to withhold at 22% no matter what my actual tax bracket is? That seems like it would result in a lot of overwithholding for people in lower brackets. Is there any way to adjust this or do I just have to wait until tax season to get the excess back?

0 coins

I had this exact same confusion last year and it nearly cost me big time. To clarify the misunderstanding: your CPA might be confusing solo 401k rules with ESTABLISHING the plan itself. The plan needs to be established by Dec 31st, but only the employee contributions need to be completed by then. Employer contributions can definitely be made until your tax filing deadline (including extensions). I confirmed this with both the IRS and my provider (Vanguard in my case).

0 coins

So if I'm just setting up a solo 401k now for the first time, am I already too late for making any contributions for 2023? Or can I still set it up and at least do the employer portion?

0 coins

Daniel Price

•

Unfortunately, if you're just setting up a solo 401k now, you've missed the window for 2023 contributions. The plan itself must be established by December 31st of the tax year you want to contribute for. Since we're already past that deadline, any solo 401k you set up now would only allow contributions for the 2024 tax year going forward. This is one of those strict IRS rules that doesn't have exceptions - the plan establishment deadline is firm. You might want to look into SEP-IRA options instead, as those have more flexible establishment deadlines.

0 coins

Liv Park

•

One thing nobody mentioned - if you're right against the deadline, consider doing an ACH transfer instead of a wire. With Schwab specifically (I have my solo 401k there too), they count the contribution based on when you initiate it, not when it settles. So even if it takes a couple days to process, as long as you start the transfer before the deadline, you're good. Just make sure to screenshot the confirmation page showing the date you initiated it, just in case there are ever any questions.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

Has anyone here successfully used a vehicle under 6,000 lbs for a business deduction recently? What documentation did you need during tax time? My tax guy is telling me one thing but what I'm reading online is different.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

I've been doing this for years with my consulting business. The absolute MOST IMPORTANT thing is a mileage log with dates, starting/ending odometer readings, destinations, and business purpose. I use an app called MileIQ that tracks it automatically. I do actual expenses because I drive a fairly expensive but small SUV, so I also keep all receipts for gas, insurance, repairs, etc. in a folder. My tax person told me the IRS loves to audit vehicle deductions so I'm super careful with documentation.

0 coins

Jibriel Kohn

•

Great question! I've been dealing with this exact situation for my marketing consultancy. You're absolutely right that vehicles under 6,000 lbs can still qualify for business deductions - just not the full Section 179 treatment that the heavy trucks get. For your photography business with 80% business use, here's what I've learned: **Standard Mileage vs. Actual Expenses:** - Standard mileage is simpler (currently $0.67/mile for 2024, likely similar for 2025) - Actual expenses can be better if you have a pricier vehicle or high maintenance costs - You can't switch between methods once you choose for a specific vehicle **Key things for vehicles under 6,000 lbs:** - Annual depreciation limits apply (around $19,200 first year max, then lower amounts in subsequent years) - You'll depreciate over 5 years using MACRS - Keep detailed mileage logs from day one - this is crucial for audits **My recommendation:** Run the numbers both ways before deciding. For a reliable crossover/sedan with 80% business use, actual expenses often work better than mileage if you're buying new or newer used. Also, consider timing your purchase - if you buy late in the year, you might want to wait until January to maximize your first-year deduction under the half-year convention rules. Document everything religiously - the IRS scrutinizes vehicle deductions heavily!

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I was hoping to find! As someone new to business vehicle deductions, the timing aspect you mentioned is really interesting. Can you explain more about the "half-year convention rules"? I'm planning to purchase in December - would it really be better to wait until January? Also, when you say "run the numbers both ways," is there a simple way to estimate which method might work better before I commit to one approach?

0 coins

Prev1...22932294229522962297...5643Next