This is exactly the type of complex partnership liquidation issue that trips up many practitioners. You're absolutely right that Partner C's capital account should zero out upon complete liquidation. The key is understanding that when a partner with a negative capital account receives a liquidating distribution, they're essentially receiving more than their "share" of partnership assets. The $33,000 distribution plus the forgiveness of their $38,000 negative capital account results in a $71,000 economic benefit, which is taxable gain. On the K-1 Section L, you'll show: (1) the $33,000 cash distribution as a negative adjustment, and (2) a positive $71,000 adjustment labeled something like "gain recognition on liquidation of negative capital account." This brings the ending capital account to zero, which is correct for a fully liquidated partner. Don't forget to check if the partnership has any "hot assets" under Section 751 that would cause part of this gain to be ordinary income rather than capital gain. Also verify your partnership agreement doesn't have any special provisions for deficit restoration that might affect this treatment.

I've been preparing partnership returns for over 15 years, and negative capital account liquidations are definitely one of the trickier areas. Your analysis is spot on - Partner C should recognize $71,000 of gain and their capital account should zero out. One additional consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet is the timing of when to report this. Make sure you're treating this as a liquidating distribution in the year it actually occurred, not spread over multiple years. The entire gain recognition happens in the year of liquidation, even if there were installment payments or other complications. Also, double-check that Partner C's original capital account calculation was correct. Sometimes negative capital accounts result from errors in prior year allocations of income, loss, or distributions. If there were mistakes in earlier years, you might need to consider amended returns before finalizing the liquidation treatment. The Section L entries you're planning are exactly right - negative adjustment for the cash received, positive adjustment for the gain recognition to zero out the account. Just make sure your gain calculation considers the partner's outside basis as well, since that affects the ultimate tax consequences to Partner C personally.

I've been managing rental properties for over a decade and wanted to add a few important points that might help: For your renovation expenses, document everything with contractor invoices that clearly separate labor from materials. The IRS often looks more favorably on repairs when you can show you were fixing specific problems rather than just upgrading. For example, "replaced water-damaged subfloor and matching laminate" reads very different from "installed new luxury vinyl plank flooring." Regarding your parents' units, there's actually a middle ground option many people miss: you could establish a "services in lieu of rent" arrangement. If they're genuinely providing property maintenance and childcare services, document the fair market value of those services and treat it as if they're paying rent equal to that value, then you're paying them for services. This requires careful documentation but can make those units qualify as rental property for tax purposes. One critical point about the insurance deduction - make sure you're not double-counting. If you're deducting insurance as a rental expense for the rental unit, you can't also claim it as part of your homeowner's deduction on Schedule A. The IRS catches this overlap frequently. Finally, consider setting up a separate business checking account for all property-related expenses, even for your primary residence portion. It makes record-keeping much cleaner and shows the IRS you're treating this seriously as a business operation.

I've been working as a tax preparer for 15 years and see these multi-family owner-occupied situations frequently. Let me address a few key points that haven't been fully covered: For your $22,000 rental unit renovation, the IRS has become stricter about the repair vs. improvement distinction. The key test is whether you're restoring the property to its original condition or making it better than it was. A "new kitchen" typically means improvement (depreciated), but if you can document that you replaced a non-functioning kitchen with basic equivalent fixtures due to damage or wear, portions might qualify as repairs. Regarding your parents' units, the rent-free arrangement creates a personal use classification that eliminates most deductions. However, if you formalize ANY payment arrangement - even $50/month plus utilities - those units can qualify as rental property. The IRS doesn't require market-rate rent, just that there's a genuine rental relationship with profit motive. For insurance, only deduct the percentage that corresponds to actual rental income-producing units. In your case, that would be 25% (1 out of 4 units), not 75%. The units your parents occupy rent-free don't qualify for business deductions. One often-missed deduction: if you use any part of your personal unit for property management (like a home office for rental paperwork), you might qualify for additional home office deductions under the simplified method. Document everything meticulously - the IRS frequently audits multi-family properties because the personal/business use line is complex.

I used PayPal for my refund last year and it was honestly more trouble than it was worth. Like others mentioned, they put a hold on my deposit for "verification" that lasted about a week. The worst part was their customer service - when I called to ask about the hold, they couldn't give me a clear timeline for when it would be released. Ended up switching back to my regular checking account this year. The extra convenience just isn't worth the stress of not knowing when you'll actually get your money!

I work at a credit union and see this issue come up a lot during tax season. While PayPal is technically allowed by the IRS, financial institutions like PayPal have stricter fraud monitoring systems that often flag large government deposits as suspicious. Traditional banks have better processes for handling IRS refunds since they see them regularly. If you're set on using PayPal, make sure your account is fully verified with your SSN and has your legal name exactly as it appears on your tax return. But honestly, I'd recommend just using a regular bank account - it's one less thing to worry about during an already stressful time!

I just went through this exact same headache with my K-1 Section 199A information! After hours of confusion, I finally figured out the issue - TurboTax does handle the QBID calculation automatically, but there's one critical step that's easy to miss. When you're entering your K-1 information, make sure you're completing the entire K-1 interview process in TurboTax, not just entering the numbers and skipping ahead. The software asks several questions about the nature of your business activity that directly impact how it calculates your Section 199A deduction. For your specific numbers from Box 20 Code Z, TurboTax will use the ordinary income ($22,450) and W-2 wages ($11,380) for the QBID calculation. The self-employment earnings ($30,275) and health insurance payments ($2,190) factor into other parts of your return but don't directly determine your qualified business income deduction amount. One thing that helped me verify everything was working correctly: after entering all my K-1 info, I went to the "Federal Taxes" tab, then "Wages & Income," and clicked "Show more" to see all the forms TurboTax was generating. I could see Form 8995 listed there, which confirmed the QBID was being calculated. The deduction should show up on line 13 of your Form 1040 as "Qualified business income deduction." If you don't see it there after completing your K-1 entry, that's when you know something went wrong in the process.

I just want to add something that might help others who are struggling with this same K-1 Section 199A issue in TurboTax. After reading through all these comments and dealing with my own K-1 headaches, I realized there's one more thing to watch out for that hasn't been mentioned yet. Make sure you check if your partnership sent you any supplemental schedules or attachments along with your K-1. Sometimes the Section 199A information isn't complete on the main K-1 form itself, and there are additional details in attachments that TurboTax needs to properly calculate your QBID. In my case, I had been entering everything from the main K-1 form but completely missed a supplemental schedule that had additional W-2 wage information and qualified property details. Once I entered that information, my QBID calculation changed significantly. Also, if you're still not seeing the deduction appear after following all the advice here, try looking at your "Detailed Tax Summary" in TurboTax rather than just the main forms view. Sometimes the Section 199A deduction is calculated correctly but doesn't show up prominently in the interface until you're actually ready to file. The bottom line is that Emma's frustration is totally understandable - this stuff is genuinely complex even when the software is working correctly. But once you get through it the first time, subsequent years become much easier since you'll know what to expect.

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I just want to add one more perspective for anyone still feeling overwhelmed by this De Minimus situation. I work in tax prep (not giving professional advice here, just sharing general experience), and we see this confusion ALL the time during tax season. The key thing to remember is that "De Minimus" is more of an internal designation that brokerages use - it's not an official IRS term that you need to worry about understanding completely. What matters is: if you have a 1099 form (even one labeled as De Minimus), look at the actual dollar amounts in each box. If there are numbers there, enter them in your tax software. If the boxes are all zeros or blank, then there's nothing to report. The reason TurboTax and other software sometimes can't import these forms is because they're often generated differently or flagged in the system as "non-standard." But the manual entry process is usually very straightforward - just match the box numbers on your form to the corresponding fields in your tax software. Don't let the fancy Latin terminology stress you out - you've got this!

As someone who's dealt with this exact situation multiple times, I want to emphasize what Jackie mentioned about not overthinking the "De Minimus" label. It's really just broker-speak for "small amounts." Here's my simple approach: Take your Fidelity form and go box by box. If you see ANY dollar amount (even $0.01), manually enter it in TurboTax under the appropriate section (dividends, interest, capital gains, etc.). The import feature failing doesn't mean the income isn't reportable. I've found that Fidelity customer service reps often aren't trained well on the tax implications of these designations. They know how to generate the forms but not always what you should do with them tax-wise. One last tip - if you're using TurboTax, when you get to the investment income section, choose "I'll type in my tax info instead" rather than trying to import. It usually takes less than 10 minutes to manually enter everything, and you'll have peace of mind knowing it's all properly reported. The bottom line: De Minimus or not, if Fidelity gave you a 1099 with numbers on it, those numbers go on your tax return!