


Ask the community...
One thing nobody mentioned - if you did make excess contributions to your HSA because of Medicare enrollment timing, you can withdraw them (plus any earnings on those contributions) by your tax filing deadline without penalty. You'd just need to ask your HSA administrator for a "return of excess contributions" form.
Thanks, that's super helpful. Do you know if you need to coordinate this with Medicare somehow? Like do you need documentation from Medicare about your enrollment date to show the HSA provider?
Great question about HSA documentation! You typically don't need to coordinate directly with Medicare when requesting a return of excess contributions from your HSA provider. Your HSA administrator will usually just need you to specify which contributions were made during ineligible months and the total amount to be withdrawn. However, it's definitely smart to have your Medicare enrollment documentation handy - like your Medicare card showing your effective date or your enrollment confirmation letter. Some HSA providers might ask for this to verify the timing, especially if the excess contribution period spans multiple months. The key thing to remember is that any earnings on the excess contributions also need to be withdrawn and will be taxable as income (though not subject to the additional 20% penalty if withdrawn by the tax deadline). Your HSA provider should be able to calculate the earnings portion for you when processing the return.
This is really helpful information! I'm in a similar situation where I might need to withdraw excess HSA contributions. Just to clarify - when you say "withdrawn by the tax deadline," does that mean the original tax filing deadline (usually April 15th) or can it be the extended deadline if you file an extension? Also, do you know if there's a difference in how this is handled if you're doing catch-up contributions for being over 55?
Tax attorney with 8 years experience here, and I wanted to share a perspective that might be particularly relevant since you're coming from environmental law with two young kids. I made a similar transition from regulatory work (securities law) to tax about 5 years ago, and the learning curve was steep but manageable. What really helped was that both fields require you to navigate complex, constantly evolving regulatory frameworks - so you already have that analytical foundation. Regarding work-life balance with kids, here's my honest take: tax law is definitely better than litigation or transactional work for predictability, but "better" doesn't mean "perfect." I work about 50 hours during non-busy season and 65-70 hours January through April. The key difference is that I can plan around those intense periods. My kids (ages 5 and 8) know that during tax season, mom will be working late, but they also know that summer means reliable family time and weekend trips. One thing I'd strongly recommend: before making the switch, try to get some exposure to actual tax work during busy season. Maybe volunteer for pro bono tax prep or shadow someone in March. The intensity is real, and you want to make sure it's sustainable for your family situation. Currently making $145k in a mid-tier market at a regional firm focusing on business tax planning. The money isn't the $250k you mentioned, but the predictable schedule has been worth the trade-off. I actually get to use my vacation days and show up to school events most of the year. The path to better work-life balance in tax exists, but it requires being realistic about expectations and very strategic about firm selection and practice area focus.
This is such valuable advice, especially coming from someone who made a similar regulatory-to-tax transition! Your point about the analytical foundation from environmental/regulatory work transferring over gives me a lot of confidence that the switch is doable, even if challenging initially. The suggestion to get exposure to actual tax work during busy season is brilliant - volunteering for pro bono tax prep or shadowing during March would give me a realistic preview of what I'd be signing up for. I definitely don't want to make this career change based on idealized expectations only to realize the reality doesn't work for my family. Your current situation really resonates with what I'm hoping to achieve - $145k might not be the inflated $250k number floating around, but being able to actually use vacation days and show up to school events sounds like a massive quality of life improvement over my current unpredictable environmental litigation schedule. I'm curious about the transition logistics - when you made the switch from securities to tax, did you take any formal coursework beforehand, or was most of the learning on-the-job? And during those first few months, how did you manage the learning curve while still meeting billable hour expectations? I want to set realistic expectations for how long it might take to feel competent in the new field. Thank you for the honest perspective about "better" not meaning "perfect" - that's exactly the kind of realistic framework I need to evaluate this decision properly.
Tax attorney here with 6 years experience, and I wanted to add a perspective that might be helpful since you mentioned considering this career switch specifically for work-life balance with young kids. I made the transition from corporate litigation to tax law 4 years ago for similar reasons - I had a newborn and was tired of the unpredictable schedule in litigation. The good news is that tax law really is more family-friendly than most legal specialties, but the "40-hour week with $250k salary" expectation needs some reality-checking. Here's what I've found: I work about 45-48 hours most of the year, spiking to 60-65 during busy season (January-April). The key advantage is predictability - I can tell my spouse in December exactly when I'll be slammed, and we plan accordingly. My kids know that spring means "daddy works late" but summer and fall mean consistent bedtime stories and weekend soccer games. Currently making $138k at a regional firm in a mid-size market after 6 total years of legal experience. Not the huge salary you mentioned, but the trade-off has been worth it. I actually take my vacation days, rarely work weekends outside of tax season, and haven't missed a school play or parent-teacher conference in two years. The transition from litigation wasn't too difficult - both areas require attention to detail and complex analysis. I did take an evening tax course while still practicing litigation, which helped a lot during interviews. If you're serious about this switch, I'd recommend targeting firms that emphasize tax planning over pure compliance work, and definitely ask about their expectations for billable hours outside of busy season. That's where you'll find the work-life balance sweet spot you're looking for.
I went through this exact situation two years ago! One thing that really helped me was keeping a detailed travel log throughout the year - dates, locations, and which clients I worked for where. This became crucial when determining which states I needed to file in and how to allocate my income. For your federal return, using your parents' address is totally fine - that's what I did. The IRS just needs a reliable mailing address. For state taxes, you'll likely need to file as a non-resident in states where you earned income, but each state has different thresholds. Some require filing if you earned any income there, others have minimum amounts. One surprise I encountered was that some states consider you a resident if you spend more than 183 days there, even without a permanent address. Since you mentioned working in 7 states, definitely track your days carefully. I ended up owing taxes in 4 different states but got credits that prevented double taxation. Also, don't forget about potential deductions for travel expenses between work locations - this can add up significantly for consultants like us who are constantly moving between clients.
This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar situation right now and hadn't thought about the 183-day rule. When you say you tracked your days carefully, did you use any specific app or just keep a manual log? I'm worried I might have already missed some days since I didn't start tracking until recently. Also, when you mention travel expenses between work locations being deductible - does that include things like gas, hotels, and meals while traveling between different client sites?
@Connor O'Neill Great point about the travel log! I used a simple spreadsheet with columns for date, city/state, client, and days spent there. You can also use apps like TripLog or MileIQ that track location automatically, though I preferred manual tracking for accuracy. For missed days, don't panic - you can reconstruct a lot from credit card statements, hotel receipts, flight records, and even Google location history if you have it enabled. I had to do this for about 6 weeks where I forgot to track. Regarding travel expenses - yes, transportation costs (gas, flights, trains) between different work locations are generally deductible. Hotels are typically deductible when you're away from your tax home overnight for business. Meals are usually 50% deductible while traveling for business. The key is that it has to be travel between different work sites or clients - not commuting to the same location daily. Keep all receipts and document the business purpose! Just remember the IRS expects "ordinary and necessary" business expenses, so make sure you can justify each expense as directly related to earning income from your consulting work.
As someone who went through this exact situation, I'd strongly recommend documenting everything now before tax season gets crazy. Create a spreadsheet with every location you worked, dates, income sources, and keep digital copies of all receipts. One thing that really saved me was establishing a clear "tax home" early on. Since you use your parents' address for official documents, that's likely your tax home for IRS purposes. This becomes your reference point for determining what travel expenses are deductible. Don't stress too much about the multi-state aspect - yes, you'll probably need to file non-resident returns in several states, but most tax software can handle this. The key is knowing your income allocation by state. If you have W-2s from different states, that makes it easier since the income sourcing is already documented. Also, keep in mind that as a traveling consultant, many of your expenses (lodging, transportation between clients, meals while away from your tax home) may be deductible. This can significantly reduce your tax burden and often makes up for the complexity of filing in multiple states. Start gathering everything now - waiting until April will only make it more stressful!
This is excellent advice! I'm just starting to navigate this whole nomadic tax situation myself. Quick question - when you mention establishing a "tax home," how important is it that you actually spend significant time at that address? I use my sister's address in Oregon for everything official (mail, voter registration, etc.) but I've probably only been there maybe 10 days total this year. Also, did you run into any issues with different states having different rules about what constitutes "doing business" there? I had one client meeting in New York that lasted 3 days, but I'm not sure if that triggers any filing requirements or if there's a minimum threshold. Starting to gather everything now as you suggested - better to be overprepared than scrambling in March!
I'm dealing with the exact same nightmare! Filed my 2024 return on February 3rd, got acceptance within minutes, but just discovered a 810 freeze code on my transcript dated February 10th with "RETURN NOT PRESENT" showing everywhere. It's incredibly frustrating that the system can accept our returns electronically but then they just vanish into some bureaucratic black hole. After reading everyone's experiences here, it's crystal clear that waiting for automatic resolution is probably futile. The pattern seems consistent - 810 codes almost always require human intervention. I've been dreading the phone call because of all the horror stories about 3+ hour wait times and getting disconnected, but it sounds like the actual resolution is usually straightforward once you reach an agent. The complete lack of communication from the IRS is what really grinds my gears. They have all our contact information but can't be bothered to send even a basic notice explaining why our refund is frozen? Instead we're left to decode cryptic transcript messages like we're solving ancient riddles. @Kevin Bell @Oliver Cheng - Thanks for sharing those resources! I'm definitely going to try both claimyr.com and taxr.ai. It's absolutely insane that we need third-party services just to communicate with our own tax agency, but if they can help avoid the phone system nightmare, they're worth trying. Planning to call at 7 AM tomorrow if those services don't work out. Will definitely update with my progress. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - it's oddly comforting to know we're all suffering through this together! š¤
I'm in almost the exact same boat! Filed February 5th, acceptance confirmation came through immediately, but discovered the 810 freeze on my transcript last week dated February 11th. Same "RETURN NOT PRESENT" message across all the income fields. The timing is so weird - like why does the system accept our returns instantly but then they get stuck in limbo for weeks? And you're absolutely right about the communication issue. They can send us notices for literally everything else but when our refunds are frozen, radio silence! I've been reading through this whole thread and it's pretty clear we need to call. Everyone who waited for automatic resolution either waited months or it never happened at all. The success stories all involve actually talking to an agent, even though getting through is a nightmare. I'm also going to try those services people mentioned. At this point I'd pay anything to avoid sitting on hold for 4 hours just to get disconnected. Will definitely keep you posted on what works! Good luck tomorrow - hopefully we can all get this resolved soon! š¤
I'm experiencing the exact same issue right now! Filed my 2024 return on February 14th, got immediate acceptance confirmation, but my transcript shows a 810 freeze from February 21st with that dreaded "RETURN NOT PRESENT FOR THIS ACCOUNT" message across all fields. After reading through everyone's experiences here, it's become crystal clear that waiting for these 810 codes to resolve automatically is basically wishful thinking. The pattern is overwhelmingly consistent - these freezes need human intervention virtually every time. I've been putting off calling because the wait time horror stories are genuinely terrifying, but it sounds like once you actually reach an agent, the resolution is typically pretty quick. What's most infuriating is the complete communication blackout from the IRS. They can process electronic acceptance in milliseconds but then our returns disappear into some manual review purgatory with zero explanation. No letters, no emails, no calls - just cryptic codes we have to stumble upon and decode ourselves like tax archaeologists. @Kevin Bell @Oliver Cheng - I'm definitely going to try both claimyr.com and taxr.ai based on the multiple recommendations here. It's absolutely absurd that we need third-party services just to communicate with our own government agency, but if they can save me from the phone system torture chamber, they're worth every penny. Planning to call at 7 AM sharp tomorrow if those services don't pan out. Have all my documents ready - SSN, filing status, refund amount, and last year's return for identity verification. Will absolutely update with my progress! Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - there's definitely strength in numbers knowing we're all battling this same bureaucratic nightmare together! šŖ
Luca Ricci
I've been following this thread and wanted to add my perspective as someone who went through a very similar situation last year! Had a 470 code with an EIC-related outstanding balance that took about 8 weeks to resolve. The court ruling you have is absolutely golden - that's the kind of documentation the IRS has to respect and it puts you in a much stronger position than most people dealing with these codes. In my case, they offset about 30% of my refund to cover the old debt, but I still received the majority back due to similar circumstances (though I didn't have court documentation as strong as yours). A few things that helped me: keep calling every 2-3 weeks for updates, make sure they have all your hardship documentation in their system, and don't hesitate to mention the court ruling in every conversation. The waiting is absolutely brutal but your case looks really promising given all the legal backing you have. The fact that the court ruled in your favor regarding the children's claims should work heavily in your favor. Hang in there - this is going to work out! šŖ
0 coins
Samantha Johnson
ā¢Just jumping in as someone who's been lurking and reading everyone's stories - this whole thread has been such an eye-opener! I had no idea 470 codes were so common or that there were actually success stories like this. The original poster's situation with the court ruling sounds incredibly strong, and seeing that you got most of your refund back even with an outstanding balance is really encouraging. I'm completely new to tax issues but this community is teaching me so much about what to expect and how to handle these situations. The practical advice everyone's sharing about calling every few weeks and keeping documentation is super helpful. Thanks for adding your experience to the mix! š
0 coins
Liam Cortez
Hey Marilyn! I've been through almost this exact situation and wanted to share some hope with you. Had a 470 code with an outstanding EIC balance from a previous year, and while it took about 10 weeks to resolve, I did get a good portion of my refund back even with the debt. The court ruling in your favor is HUGE - that's solid legal documentation that proves the IRS made an error with their original adjustment. In my case, they offset about 35% of my refund against the old balance, but because of hardship status and having proof their adjustment was wrong, I still received the majority. Make sure the IRS has copies of that court ruling in their system and keep calling every 2-3 weeks for updates. Document every conversation and don't let them brush you off with "just wait" - ask for timelines and reference numbers. The 470 code is frustrating but it does eventually clear, and having that court documentation puts you in a much stronger position than most people. Keep pushing on the hardship claim too - it really does help protect your refund. Hang in there, this will work out in your favor! š
0 coins