IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm going through almost the exact same thing right now! They misread my $127 charitable deduction as $1,270 and are claiming I owe an extra $400. It's so frustrating because you can clearly see on the 1099 what the actual amount should be. I sent my certified letter with all the documentation about 4 months ago and just got my fourth "we need more time" letter. At this point I'm starting to wonder if anyone actually reads these things or if they just automatically generate delay letters forever. The worst part is seeing that balance on my account transcript knowing it's completely wrong but being powerless to fix it quickly. Thanks for posting this - at least I know I'm not alone in dealing with their scanning problems!

0 coins

I feel your pain! Four months of delay letters is incredibly frustrating, especially when you have clear documentation showing their error. The scanning issues seem to be getting worse - I've heard from multiple people dealing with similar problems where handwritten numbers get completely mangled. Have you considered trying any of the tools or services mentioned earlier in this thread? The Claimyr callback service that @Grace Durand and @Zoe Wang used might help you get through to someone who can at least put notes on your account to stop the automated collection process while they sort this out. Also, since you re at'the 4-month mark, you might want to start preparing for the 6-month milestone when you can escalate to your Congressional representative s office'if the IRS still hasn t acted.'Keep all those delay letters as evidence of how long this has been dragging on!

0 coins

I went through something very similar about 18 months ago when the IRS misread my handwritten $847 medical deduction as $8,470. Like you, I got those maddening 60-day delay letters for what felt like forever. Here's what I learned: those letters are basically automated placeholders their system generates when your case hasn't been assigned to a human reviewer yet. The frustrating reality is that correspondence review is one of their lowest priority queues, especially for what they consider "simple" scanning errors. What finally worked for me was being persistent about documentation. I kept meticulous records of every letter, every date, and every certified mail receipt. When I hit the 7-month mark with no resolution, I contacted my state representative's office. Their caseworker was able to get my file reviewed within 2 weeks, and the error was corrected with a full refund of the incorrect amount plus interest they had charged me. Don't pay what they're asking for - you're 100% right that it's their scanning error. Keep waiting, keep your documentation organized, and start thinking about Congressional help if you hit the 6-month mark. You will eventually get this resolved correctly.

0 coins

This is really encouraging to hear that you eventually got it resolved! Seven months is a long time to wait, but knowing there's light at the end of the tunnel helps. I'm curious - when your state representative's office got involved, did they contact the IRS directly or did they have you submit additional documentation through them? I'm keeping detailed records like you suggested, including screenshots of my online account showing the incorrect balance. It's reassuring to know that the Congressional route actually works when the normal process fails. Did you get any pushback from the IRS about the interest they had charged on the incorrect amount, or did they automatically reverse all of that once they fixed the scanning error?

0 coins

StormChaser

•

Don't forget that if your mom provides childcare in YOUR home rather than hers, the tax situation changes. She might actually be considered a household employee (like a nanny) rather than self-employed. If that's the case, you might need to pay employment taxes (Social Security and Medicare). There's a household employment tax threshold ($2,600 for 2025), and if you paid her more than that in a calendar year, you'd need to look into "nanny taxes" using Schedule H with your tax return. It gets complicated quickly!

0 coins

Is it just about WHERE the childcare happens? My mother-in-law watches my kids at my house 3 days a week and at her house 2 days. How would we handle that split situation?

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

It's not just about location - the key factor is whether she has control over how the work is performed or if you're directing her activities. If she's essentially following your schedule, using your supplies, and you're controlling when and how she provides care, she's likely a household employee regardless of location. For a split situation like yours, the IRS would look at the overall arrangement. If the majority of control rests with you (setting schedules, providing materials, directing activities), then the entire arrangement would likely be treated as household employment, even if some care happens at her house. However, if she has significant independence - like setting her own rates, providing her own supplies, caring for other children, and having control over her methods - she might qualify as an independent contractor for the whole arrangement. The $2,600 threshold would apply to your total payments to her for the year, not split by location.

0 coins

LilMama23

•

Just want to add another consideration that often gets overlooked - make sure to keep detailed records of all payments to your mom throughout the year. The IRS recommends maintaining records like cancelled checks, bank statements, or receipts showing dates and amounts paid. Since you mentioned paying around $5,500, you're well above the household employment threshold that StormChaser mentioned. Even if your mom ends up being classified as self-employed rather than a household employee, having clear documentation will be crucial if you're ever audited. Also, consider having a simple written agreement with your mom outlining the childcare arrangement, even though she's family. This can help establish whether she's truly self-employed (setting her own terms, rates, methods) or if she's more like a household employee (following your schedule and directions). The IRS looks at the degree of control you have over the work when making this determination. One last tip - if your mom does end up owing self-employment taxes on this income, she might want to make quarterly estimated tax payments for next year to avoid penalties, especially if this arrangement continues.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

This is such great advice about keeping detailed records! I'm actually in a very similar situation - just started paying my aunt to watch my twins, and I had no idea about the household employment threshold. One question about the written agreement you mentioned - are there specific things that should be included to help establish whether someone is self-employed vs. a household employee? Like should it specify that she sets her own rates or methods of care? I want to make sure we document this correctly from the start rather than trying to figure it out later when tax time comes around. Also, do you know if there are any templates or examples of these types of family childcare agreements that might help ensure we're covering all the important points?

0 coins

Has anyone here successfully used the QBI aggregation rules to maximize their deduction? I'm an architect with multiple business activities (design services, project management, and a small product design business) currently operating as separate Schedule Cs. Wondering if combining them under the aggregation election might help with the W-2 limitation issue since one of my businesses has employees while the others don't.

0 coins

That's super helpful, thanks! Did you need to work with a specialized CPA to get the aggregation right? I'm worried my regular tax guy might not be familiar enough with these specific QBI rules for architects.

0 coins

Alicia Stern

•

I'd definitely recommend finding a CPA who specializes in business taxation, especially if you're dealing with multiple entities and aggregation elections. The QBI rules are still relatively new (since 2018) and many general tax preparers haven't fully mastered the nuances, particularly for professional service businesses like architecture. The aggregation election can be really powerful but there are strict requirements - you need to demonstrate that the businesses operate as an integrated economic unit, share facilities, employees, or significant business operations. Just having the same owner isn't enough. For your situation with design services, project management, and product design, you'll want to document how these activities are interconnected and support each other. The IRS looks for things like shared marketing, overlapping customer bases, shared administrative functions, etc. One thing to watch out for - once you make the aggregation election, you're generally stuck with it unless there's a material change in facts and circumstances. So make sure it's the right move long-term, not just for one tax year.

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! As a mechanical engineer who just crossed the income threshold this year, I'm dealing with similar QBI confusion. One thing I've learned from my research is that the "special treatment" for engineers really just means we're not completely shut out like other professional services. The wage/property limitation still applies, but at least we get something rather than zero. I'm curious though - has anyone here looked into the qualified property component of the limitation test? I know it's 25% of wages PLUS 2.5% of qualified property. For those of us without employees, investing in depreciable business equipment might be another way to increase the deduction. Things like expensive CAD workstations, surveying equipment, or specialized software licenses that qualify for depreciation could potentially help with the calculation. Would love to hear if anyone has experience with using the property component to maximize their QBI deduction as an engineer.

0 coins

Tami Morgan

•

That's a really interesting angle I hadn't considered! I'm also a mechanical engineer dealing with the phase-out, and I've been so focused on the W-2 wage limitation that I completely overlooked the qualified property component. Do you know if leased equipment counts toward the qualified property test, or does it have to be owned outright? I lease most of my CAD workstations and some testing equipment through my business, but if purchasing them could help with QBI calculations, it might make sense to restructure those arrangements. Also wondering about software - I spend probably $15-20k annually on various engineering software licenses. Some are subscription-based, but others I could potentially purchase as perpetual licenses if that would count as qualified property for depreciation purposes. Has anyone worked with a tax professional who's specifically knowledgeable about maximizing the property component for engineering firms? This thread has been way more helpful than the generic QBI advice I've been finding online.

0 coins

There's definitely some confusion about the Social Security wage caps in this thread. Based on the information provided, if your W-2 is for the 2023 tax year and you earned $142,500, your employer was actually correct to withhold Social Security tax on your full income. The Social Security wage base for 2023 was $160,200, not $132,900 (which was the limit for 2019). Since your earnings of $142,500 are well below the 2023 cap, there was no overwithholding. I'd recommend double-checking the tax year on your W-2 form - it should be clearly marked. If it's indeed 2023, then your employer followed the correct procedures and you don't need to take any action. If it's for a different tax year where your income actually exceeded that year's specific cap, then the advice about claiming excess Social Security tax on your return would apply. This is a very common source of confusion since the wage caps increase almost every year, and it's easy to find outdated information online or mix up which year's limits apply to your specific situation.

0 coins

Ravi Kapoor

•

This wage cap confusion happens so often! I made the same mistake when I first started working and thought my employer was withholding too much Social Security tax. Turns out I was looking at information from several years prior. @d50f9aae8163 Definitely check that tax year on your W-2 before going any further. If it really is 2023 and you earned $142,500, then as everyone's pointing out, your employer did everything correctly since you're well under the $160,200 cap. But if it turns out to be an older tax year where you actually did exceed the cap, then you'll get that money back when you file - the tax software handles it automatically. Either way, you'll have a clear answer once you confirm which year's W-2 you're looking at!

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

Just to add some perspective - I've seen this exact confusion many times in tax season! The Social Security wage caps change annually, and it's super easy to accidentally reference the wrong year's limit when researching online. If your W-2 is indeed for 2023 and shows $142,500 in wages, your employer was correct. The 2023 Social Security wage base was $160,200, so you were well under the limit and should have had SS tax withheld on your full income. However, if this W-2 is for an earlier tax year (like 2021 when the cap was $142,800), then you would have a legitimate overwithholding situation. The key is checking the tax year box on your W-2 form. Don't feel bad about the confusion - the IRS publishes these limits annually and they're not always easy to find. Once you confirm the correct year, you'll know exactly whether action is needed or if everything was handled properly by your employer.

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

This is such a helpful clarification! I think a lot of people (myself included) get confused because when you search online for "Social Security wage cap" you often get results from different years mixed together. I'm curious though - where's the most reliable place to find the current year's Social Security wage base limits? I want to make sure I'm looking at the right source so I don't make this same mistake when reviewing my own tax documents. @d50f9aae8163 Hope you can get this sorted out quickly once you check that tax year on your W-2! Either way, at least you'll have a definitive answer.

0 coins

Don't forget that gift cards and cash equivalents NEVER count as gifts for tax purposes regardless of the amount. They're considered compensation and require different tax treatment. I learned this the hard way after sending $25 Amazon gift cards to each person at a client's office and trying to deduct them as gifts.

0 coins

So what happens if you do give gift cards? Do you have to issue 1099s to each recipient or something?

0 coins

James Maki

•

Yes, gift cards are treated as taxable compensation to the recipients. If you give gift cards to employees of your clients, those individuals would need to report it as income on their tax returns. However, you typically don't need to issue 1099s unless the recipient is someone you have a business relationship with (like a contractor or vendor) and the total payments exceed $600 in a year. For random employees at client offices, the responsibility to report the income falls on them, though many people don't realize this. It's one of the reasons why tangible gifts under $25 are usually much simpler from a tax perspective.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

One thing to consider that hasn't been mentioned yet is timing. The $25 gift deduction limit is per recipient per tax year, not per gift occasion. So if you've already given gifts to any of these client office employees earlier this year (maybe during the holidays or another business event), those previous gifts would count toward the annual $25 limit per person. Also, keep detailed records not just of what you spent, but the business purpose and relationship to each recipient. The IRS can be pretty strict about substantiating business gift deductions during audits, so having documentation that shows these gifts were directly related to your business and intended to generate future income is crucial. For your client appreciation event next week, you might want to consider a hybrid approach - maybe combine some individual items under $25 per key decision-maker with promotional items featuring your company branding for the broader office, which would fall under advertising expenses instead of the gift limitation.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

This is really helpful context about the annual limit! I hadn't thought about previous gifts counting toward the $25 cap. Quick question - when you mention promotional items with company branding falling under advertising expenses, does the branding need to be prominent or would a small logo on the bottom of a gift basket still qualify? I'm wondering if I could add small branded items to my existing gift baskets to potentially change how some of the cost gets categorized.

0 coins

Prev1...18551856185718581859...5643Next