


Ask the community...
Just to add some practical info on donation values - I volunteer at a nonprofit thrift store and here are some ballpark clothing values we use that the IRS generally accepts: - Men's shirts: $5-10 - Women's tops: $4-12 - Jeans/pants: $5-12 - Coats/jackets: $10-40 - Shoes: $3-9 These are general ranges and condition matters a lot! A worn-out shirt is worth less than a like-new one with tags still on.
What about designer clothes? I donated some higher-end items that originally cost hundreds. Surely they're worth more than regular clothes?
Designer items can definitely be valued higher, but you need to be reasonable about it. The IRS looks at fair market value (what someone would pay for it used) not the original price. A $300 designer blouse might be valued at $30-60 when donated, depending on condition and brand desirability. For higher-value donations, especially if the total exceeds $500, you should complete Form 8283. And for anything you value over $250 per item, make sure you have excellent documentation with detailed descriptions. Taking photos of designer labels along with the items can be helpful documentation too.
Don't forget that it's not just about the amount of donations - it's whether you have enough TOTAL itemized deductions to exceed the standard deduction. My wife and I donate about $1,200 a year but we still take the standard deduction because our mortgage interest and state taxes aren't enough to push us over the threshold.
This is such an important point. We donated nearly $2k last year but still took the standard deduction. Feels like we get no tax benefit from our generosity!
Has anyone actually checked if not claiming legit business expenses could trigger an audit? I've always been told that the IRS algorithms flag returns that don't match expected patterns for your industry. Like if most bookkeepers claim around 20-30% expenses but you claim zero, wouldn't that look weird?
Tax preparer here (not a CPA). The IRS does use a system called the Discriminant Information Function (DIF) that scores returns based on averages for your industry. Extremely low expenses can potentially raise your DIF score, but it's just one of many factors. Generally, understating deductions is less likely to trigger an audit than overstating them, but significant deviations from industry norms in either direction can increase scrutiny.
I think you're overcomplicating this. The math is pretty straightforward - you should always claim your legitimate business expenses because of the self-employment tax implications that others have mentioned. Here's why: In your Option 1, you'd have $16,000 in net earnings subject to SE tax (15.3%), which is about $2,448 in SE taxes. In your Option 2, you'd have $20,000 in net earnings subject to SE tax, which is about $3,060 in SE taxes. That's an extra $612 you'd be paying unnecessarily. Plus, your Solo 401k contribution limits are based on your net self-employment earnings anyway, so claiming legitimate expenses doesn't actually hurt your contribution capacity - it just makes your tax situation more accurate and saves you money on SE taxes. The IRS doesn't care if you don't claim every possible deduction, but why would you voluntarily pay more taxes than you legally owe? Take the deductions you're entitled to, pay the correct amount of SE tax, and then contribute what makes sense to your Solo 401k based on your actual net earnings.
Ive been a tax preparer for 8 years and ppl get confused about this all the time! Here's a quick cheat sheet for adult kids: 1. Over 19 (or over 24 if student) + income over $4,700 = NOT your dependent 2. Under 19 (or under 24 if student) + income ANY amount = CAN be your dependent if you provide >50% support and they live with you The only exception is permanently disabled adult children who can be dependents regardless of age.
Yes, the $4,700 limit does change annually! For 2024 taxes (filed in 2025), it's $4,700. For 2023 taxes it was $4,400. The IRS adjusts it each year for inflation, so it gradually increases over time. Always check the current year's amount when doing your taxes since using an outdated figure could cause problems.
Just to add another perspective - I went through this exact situation with my 19-year-old last year. She made about $6,800 working retail and I was so frustrated that I couldn't claim her even though I was paying for everything else in her life. What helped me was looking at it this way: even though you lose the dependent exemption, your kids will likely get most of their withheld taxes back as refunds since they're in such low tax brackets. In my daughter's case, she got back about $900 that had been withheld from her paychecks. Also, don't forget that you might still qualify for other tax benefits even if you can't claim them as dependents. If either of your kids takes any college courses (even just one class), you could potentially claim education credits. And if you're paying for their health insurance, you can still deduct those premiums in some situations. The IRS rules seem harsh but they're designed to prevent double-dipping - your kids get to keep their refunds, and the system assumes adults earning income should file their own returns.
This is really helpful perspective! I hadn't thought about it that way - that my kids would actually get refunds. That does make me feel a bit better about the whole situation. Do you happen to know if there are any other tax benefits I might still be eligible for even though I can't claim them as dependents? You mentioned health insurance premiums - is that something I can deduct if I'm covering them on my plan?
A $10.5k refund means your essentially giving the government an interest-free loan of almost $900 a month!!! Thats crazy in this economy. I changed my withholdings last february and now i get an extra $600 in my checks every month. Just make sure u have a little cushion in case the calculator is wrong.
Right?? I don't understand why people get excited about big refunds. That's YOUR money that you could have been using all year! But how did you figure out exactly how much to change your withholdings? Did you just guess?
I've been using Taxcaster for a few years now and I'd say it's decent for a rough estimate but definitely not perfect. The biggest issue I've found is that it doesn't handle more complex tax situations very well - like if you have multiple income sources, itemized deductions, or any unusual circumstances. That said, a $10.5k refund does sound like you're significantly overwithholding! Even if Taxcaster is off by 20-30%, you're still probably getting way more back than you should be. I'd recommend starting conservatively - maybe adjust your withholdings to reduce your expected refund by half rather than trying to zero it out completely. That way you still get some extra money in your paychecks but have a safety buffer. Also, definitely double-check your inputs in Taxcaster and consider running the numbers through the IRS Withholding Calculator as well. Having two different estimates can help you feel more confident about making changes.
This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar situation where I think I'm overwithholding but I've been too nervous to make changes. The idea of adjusting by half rather than trying to zero out the entire refund is smart - gives you that safety net while still getting some benefit. Quick question though - when you say Taxcaster doesn't handle complex situations well, what specific things should I watch out for? I have a pretty straightforward W-2 job but I do have some investment income from dividends and I'm wondering if that could throw off the estimate significantly.
Investment income is definitely one of those things that can throw off Taxcaster's estimates! Dividends are subject to different tax rates depending on whether they're qualified or non-qualified, and Taxcaster sometimes oversimplifies this. It also doesn't always account properly for the timing of when you receive dividends throughout the year. Other things to watch out for include: side gig income (1099 work), rental property income, capital gains/losses from selling investments, tax-loss harvesting, and any major changes in your situation mid-year (like getting married, having a baby, or buying a house). For your dividend income, I'd recommend being extra conservative with your withholding adjustments. Maybe start by reducing your expected refund by just 25-30% instead of half, and see how that plays out. You can always adjust further next year once you see how accurate the estimates were.
StarSailor}
This is why startup equity compensation is such a minefield. I messed up my 83(b) filing too but in a different way - I filed it but forgot to include a copy with my tax return, which apparently also invalidates it. Anyone know if there's any possible relief or exception? I've heard rumors about a "reasonable cause" exception for late filings?
0 coins
Miguel Silva
ā¢Unfortunately, the IRS is super strict about the 30-day window for 83(b) elections. From everything I've researched, there's no "reasonable cause" exception for missing the deadline. Rev. Proc. 2012-29 makes it pretty clear the deadline is non-negotiable. For your specific situation though (filing with IRS but forgetting to include with tax return), you might actually be ok! The critical part is getting it to the IRS within 30 days. Including a copy with your return is a requirement but there might be ways to correct that error since you did make the actual filing on time.
0 coins
StarSailor}
ā¢Thanks for that info! That's a huge relief. I was able to get a stamped copy of my original filing so hopefully that's enough proof that I made the actual election on time. This stuff is unnecessarily complicated!
0 coins
Logan Stewart
I feel your pain on this one! Missing the 83(b) election is unfortunately more common than you'd think, especially at startups where HR doesn't always explain the importance clearly. Since your initial FMV was $0.00, you're actually in a relatively good position compared to others who miss this deadline. The main thing to understand is that now you'll be taxed on ordinary income as your shares vest based on their fair market value at each vesting date. My advice: start preparing financially now. Set up a separate savings account and begin putting money aside for the tax bills that will come with each vesting event. If your company has had any funding rounds or valuation increases since you received your equity, those taxes could be substantial even though you won't have cash from selling shares to pay them. Also, make sure you understand exactly when your vesting dates are and try to get the company's most recent 409A valuation reports so you can estimate what you'll owe. Being proactive about this will save you from scrambling when tax time comes around.
0 coins
Levi Parker
ā¢This is really solid advice, especially about setting up a separate savings account for taxes! I'm new to equity compensation and had no idea about the "phantom income" issue until reading this thread. Quick question - do you know if there's a general rule of thumb for what percentage of the vested value to set aside for taxes? I'm trying to figure out how much to save since I have no idea what tax bracket this will put me in.
0 coins
Evelyn Kim
ā¢Great question! A good rule of thumb is to set aside 35-40% of the vested value for taxes, though this can vary based on your total income and state taxes. The equity income will be treated as ordinary income (not capital gains), so it gets added to your regular salary and taxed at your marginal rate. If this pushes you into a higher tax bracket or you're in a high-tax state like California, you might want to be even more conservative and save closer to 45-50%. It's better to overestimate and have extra cash than to scramble during tax season. Also consider that you'll likely owe quarterly estimated taxes once the amounts get substantial - the IRS doesn't like waiting until April to get paid on large income items. A tax professional familiar with equity compensation can help you set up the quarterly payments properly.
0 coins