


Ask the community...
As someone new to F reorganizations, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm curious about one aspect that hasn't been fully addressed - what happens to any accumulated adjustments account (AAA) and other S corp tax attributes during the F reorg process? I understand that the F reorg should preserve tax attributes, but I want to make sure I'm properly advising clients about how their AAA balance, accumulated earnings and profits, and prior year losses will be handled. Is there any special reporting required on the final S corp return versus the first partnership return? Also, for clients who have been operating as S corps for many years and have significant AAA balances, are there any strategies to optimize the timing of distributions before making the switch to partnership taxation? I'm thinking about potentially distributing some of the AAA tax-free to shareholders before the conversion, but want to make sure this doesn't create complications with the overall reorganization plan.
Great questions about the AAA and other S corp attributes! You're absolutely right to focus on these details - they're critical for proper planning. During an F reorganization, the AAA and other S corp tax attributes (like E&P, basis adjustments, and carryforwards) should carry over to the new entity since it's treated as the same taxpayer for federal tax purposes. However, once you make the election to be treated as a partnership, these S corp-specific attributes essentially "freeze" and become irrelevant since partnerships don't have AAA or accumulated E&P. Your strategy about timing distributions is smart! If the client has significant AAA, you might want to consider making tax-free distributions to shareholders before the partnership election (but after the F reorg). This allows them to receive some benefit from their AAA balance before it becomes meaningless. Just be careful about the step transaction doctrine we discussed earlier - you want to ensure the distribution has independent business significance. For reporting, the final S corp return (Form 1120S) should reflect the F reorg, and the first partnership return (Form 1065) starts fresh with the partnership's basis in assets. The transition can be complex, so detailed documentation is key. I'd definitely recommend working with experienced counsel on the AAA distribution timing to make sure it doesn't jeopardize the overall reorganization plan.
This has been such an informative discussion! As someone who's relatively new to complex corporate reorganizations, I wanted to add a cautionary note about documentation that I learned the hard way recently. When we completed an F reorg for a client last year, we thought we had all our ducks in a row - proper business purpose, good timing between steps, clean corporate resolutions. But during a subsequent IRS examination (unrelated to the F reorg), the agent questioned whether our reorganization truly qualified under Section 368(a)(1)(F). The key lesson: document EVERYTHING meticulously. We had to reconstruct our business purpose rationale and prove the continuity of the business enterprise. Make sure you have detailed board minutes explaining the business reasons, maintain records of all asset transfers, and keep clear documentation of how the "same business enterprise" continues under the new entity. Also, don't forget about the potential impact on state income tax elections and apportionment factors if your client operates in multiple states. Some states don't automatically follow federal tax elections, so you might need separate state-level entity classification elections. Has anyone dealt with multi-state complications during F reorgs? I'd love to hear about best practices for managing the state tax aspects when federal and state entity classifications might diverge.
Your point about documentation is spot-on and really resonates with my experience! I've seen too many practitioners get caught off guard during IRS examinations because they didn't maintain adequate contemporaneous records. Regarding multi-state complications, I've dealt with this recently in a client situation involving operations in Texas, New York, and California. The key challenge was that while the federal F reorg preserved tax attributes, California required a separate Form 3832 (Entity Classification Election) to ensure the new LLC was treated consistently for state purposes. New York generally follows federal elections, but they have their own timing requirements for filing notices of entity changes. One gotcha I discovered was that some states impose separate franchise taxes or fees during the transition period, even though it's technically the same taxpayer federally. In our case, California assessed franchise tax on both the old and new entities for the overlapping tax period until we filed the proper forms to clarify the F reorg status. My recommendation is to prepare a state-by-state analysis early in the planning process, identifying which states require separate filings, have different election deadlines, or impose additional fees. Also consider consulting with state tax specialists in each jurisdiction - the cost upfront can save significant headaches and penalties later. The documentation point you raised really can't be overstated. I now create a comprehensive "F reorg file" with timeline documentation, business purpose memoranda, and copies of all filings as a standard practice.
Your uncle is incorrect - you definitely have $6,037.50 in excess foreign tax credits that can be carried forward! The confusion comes from mixing up the annual limitation with the total credits available. Here's what's happening: The foreign tax credit limitation prevents you from using foreign taxes to offset US tax on US-source income. Since your foreign income is 25% of your total income, you can only use up to 25% of your US tax liability ($2,750 Ć 25% = $687.50) OR your actual foreign taxes paid ($8,100), whichever is SMALLER. Wait, I think there might be an error in your calculation - with a $2,750 US tax liability and 25% foreign income ratio, your limit should be $687.50, not $2,062.50. But regardless of the exact limitation amount, any foreign taxes you paid above that limit become carryforward credits that you can use in future years (up to 10 years forward). The IRS recognizes you actually paid those taxes to a foreign government, so they don't just disappear. I'd double-check your Form 1116 calculation - the limitation formula is: (Foreign source taxable income / Total taxable income) Ć Total US tax liability. Make sure you're using the right numbers in each part of that formula.
You're absolutely right about checking that calculation! I think I may have confused myself when working through the Form 1116. Let me double-check: if my US tax liability is $2,750 and my foreign income is 25% of total income, then my limitation should indeed be $2,750 Ć 25% = $687.50, not the $2,062.50 I mentioned. So that would mean I have even MORE carryforward credits - $8,100 - $687.50 = $7,412.50 that I can carry forward! This makes my uncle even more wrong about not having carryforward credits. Thanks for catching that math error. It's easy to get confused with all these calculations, but this actually makes my situation better than I thought. I really appreciate everyone's help sorting this out!
This is exactly the kind of confusion that trips up so many taxpayers with foreign income! You're absolutely right that you have significant carryforward credits available - your uncle is mixing up the limitation calculation with the actual credits you can carry forward. One thing I'd add to the excellent explanations already given: make sure you understand that the foreign tax credit limitation is calculated separately for different types of income. If all your foreign income falls into the "general category" (like wages, business income, etc.), then you'll have one calculation. But if you have passive income like dividends or interest, that gets calculated separately. Also, keep detailed records of your carryforward credits by year and category. The IRS can ask you to substantiate these amounts going back several years, especially since you'll potentially be using these credits for up to a decade. I recommend creating a simple tracking spreadsheet that shows the original year the credit was generated, the category, and how much you use each subsequent year. The key point everyone's made is correct - just because you can't use all your foreign tax credits in one year doesn't mean they disappear. The limitation exists to prevent foreign taxes from offsetting US tax on US-source income, but the IRS recognizes you actually paid those foreign taxes, hence the generous 10-year carryforward period.
This is such helpful advice about keeping detailed records! I'm wondering though - when you mention tracking by "category," are there specific IRS categories I need to be aware of beyond just passive vs general income? I'm asking because I have some foreign rental income and I'm not sure if that gets its own special treatment or falls under one of the main categories. Also, do you know if there are any software tools that can help automate this tracking, or is a manual spreadsheet really the best approach for most people?
This thread has been absolutely invaluable! As a newcomer to this community and someone who's been researching deferred compensation options for my small tech startup, I can't thank everyone enough for sharing such detailed, practical experiences. What strikes me most is how complex the reporting requirements are, but also how manageable they become when you have the right resources and guidance. The distinction between Box 11 (when earned) vs Box 1 (when paid) reporting seems straightforward once explained, but I can see how easy it would be to get wrong without proper guidance. The mentions of taxr.ai and Claimyr throughout this discussion are particularly interesting. As someone who's spent countless hours trying to decipher IRS publications and struggling to get clear answers on complex tax questions, having AI-powered document analysis combined with actual access to IRS agents sounds like a game-changer for small businesses. The fact that several initially skeptical community members ended up having positive experiences with these services makes them worth serious consideration. @ElectricDreamer, I'm curious if you've made any decisions based on all this excellent advice? And @Ivanna St. Pierre, as a CPA, do you find that most small business owners underestimate the complexity of deferred compensation reporting, or is this level of confusion typical when first implementing these plans? This community's willingness to share real-world experiences and practical solutions is exactly what makes navigating complex business challenges possible for smaller companies like mine. Thank you all!
Welcome to the community @NeonNova! As someone who just went through implementing our first deferred compensation plan six months ago, I can definitely relate to feeling overwhelmed by the complexity at first. What I've learned from this incredible thread is that while the rules are complex, they're very manageable once you understand the key principles. The Box 11 vs Box 1 distinction really is the foundation - report deferrals when earned (Box 11) and payments when received (Box 1), while handling Social Security/Medicare taxes at deferral time. Getting that timing right seems to be where most of the confusion happens. I'm also really intrigued by the taxr.ai and Claimyr mentions throughout this discussion. Like many others here, I was initially skeptical, but the detailed testimonials from community members who actually used these services are quite compelling. For a tech startup like yours, having AI analyze your plan documents for 409A compliance issues and being able to get official IRS guidance when needed could save both time and costly mistakes. One thing I'd add based on our experience - start small with a pilot group of one or two executives before rolling out to everyone eligible. This lets you test your reporting processes and work out any kinks before dealing with larger numbers. The learning curve is definitely manageable, especially with all the great advice shared in this thread!
As a newcomer to this community, I'm absolutely blown away by the depth and quality of advice shared in this thread! I run a small nonprofit organization and we've been considering adding deferred compensation as part of our executive retention strategy, but I was intimidated by the complexity. Reading through everyone's experiences has made this feel much more manageable. The key distinction between Box 11 (report when earned) vs Box 1 (report when paid) seems to be the foundation that everything else builds on. I particularly appreciate @Ivanna St. Pierre's professional validation and @Sean Fitzgerald's point about coordinating with payroll providers early - that's exactly the kind of practical detail that could save major headaches later. The mentions of taxr.ai and Claimyr throughout this discussion are fascinating. As someone who's spent way too many hours trying to reach the IRS on other issues, the idea of actually getting connected to a knowledgeable agent who can provide specific guidance sounds almost miraculous. The fact that multiple community members went from skeptical to convinced after using these services makes them worth serious consideration. One question for the group - does anyone have experience with deferred compensation in the nonprofit sector? I'm wondering if there are any additional considerations or restrictions I should be aware of beyond the standard Section 409A requirements. The intermediate sanctions rules for nonprofits can be tricky, and I want to make sure we don't inadvertently create any compliance issues. Thanks to everyone for creating such a valuable resource thread!
Welcome to the community @Eve Freeman! Great question about nonprofit deferred compensation. You're absolutely right to be concerned about intermediate sanctions - the IRS is particularly strict about excessive compensation for nonprofits, and deferred comp can definitely trigger scrutiny. For nonprofits, you'll need to ensure your deferred compensation arrangements meet the rebuttable presumption requirements under IRC Section 4958. This means having your board (with no conflicts of interest) approve the arrangements based on appropriate comparable data, and documenting that decision process thoroughly. The compensation committee should get independent comparability studies showing that total compensation (including deferred amounts) is reasonable for similar organizations. Also be aware that unlike for-profit companies, nonprofits have additional reporting requirements. You'll need to disclose deferred compensation arrangements on Form 990, and amounts over $100,000 to any individual must be reported in the compensation tables. The same Box 11 vs Box 1 W-2 reporting rules apply, but I'd strongly recommend getting the plan documents reviewed by an attorney experienced with nonprofit compliance. The intersection of Section 409A and intermediate sanctions rules can be tricky. The taxr.ai and Claimyr services mentioned throughout this thread could be particularly valuable for nonprofits, since you likely have tighter budget constraints for legal and tax consulting. Having AI analyze your documents for compliance issues and getting direct IRS guidance could help ensure you stay within all the rules without breaking the bank on professional fees.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet is that meal deduction rules can differ by business type! My wife has an LLC taxed as an S-Corp and we have completely different rules than when I had a single-member LLC. Also, the actual verbiage in your LLC operating agreement matters. If your wife's LLC operating agreement specifically mentions regular planning meetings as part of operations, you're in a much stronger position to defend those meal deductions. Might be worth having a tax attorney review your operating agreement to see if an amendment would help clarify and support these deductions going forward. The other question is how the LLC is taxed - is it a pass-through entity or does she file separate business returns? That can impact how these deductions are treated too.
Wait - I didn't know operating agreements could affect deductions! Our agreement is just a standard template we downloaded. Can you actually put specific language about business meals in there? Would that really make a difference to the IRS?
Based on my experience with similar LLC situations, your spouse business meal deductions are in a gray area that requires very careful documentation. The IRS doesn't have specific rules prohibiting spouse-to-spouse business meals, but they scrutinize them heavily because they could easily be viewed as personal expenses disguised as business deductions. The key factors that make these deductions defensible are: 1) The meals have a clear business purpose that wouldn't exist without the LLC, 2) You maintain detailed records beyond just receipts (specific topics discussed, decisions made, action items), 3) The frequency is reasonable (occasional planning sessions, not regular dinners), and 4) The expenses are proportional to your business income. Given that your wife's LLC income is only 3-4% of household earnings, these deductions might fly under the radar, but that doesn't make them automatically legitimate. I'd recommend starting to document these meals more thoroughly going forward - keep a business diary with dates, specific article topics discussed, planning decisions made, and concrete outcomes from each meeting. The fact that two different accountants haven't flagged this suggests it's not obviously wrong, but it's still worth getting proper documentation in place to protect yourself if questions ever arise.
This is really comprehensive advice! I'm curious about the documentation part - when you mention keeping a "business diary," do you mean a separate log just for these meals, or should it be integrated into regular business records? Also, how detailed do the notes need to be? Like, is "discussed Q2 article topics and decided on three new pieces" enough, or do you need to list the actual article titles and specific decisions made? I'm asking because I have a similar side consulting LLC and want to make sure I'm documenting correctly from the start rather than trying to fix things later.
Harper Hill
As a newcomer to this community, I want to echo what many others have said - this thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding bonus taxation! I just went through this exact situation a few months ago and had the same panic reaction when I saw how much was withheld from my bonus. What really helped me was keeping track of my total withholdings throughout the year after my bonus. I created a simple spreadsheet to monitor my year-to-date federal withholding versus what I would actually owe based on my projected annual income. This gave me confidence that I was indeed on track for a refund rather than owing money at tax time. One thing I'd add for fellow newcomers - don't forget about state taxes too! The federal withholding gets most of the attention, but your state likely withheld additional taxes from your bonus as well. In my case, my state used a flat 5% rate for supplemental income, which added to that "sticker shock" feeling. But just like federal taxes, it all gets reconciled when you file your state return. For anyone still feeling anxious about this - I can confirm that when I filed my taxes this past April, I got back almost exactly what the IRS withholding estimator predicted. The system really does work, even though it feels scary in the moment!
0 coins
Harmony Love
ā¢Thanks for sharing your experience, @Harper Hill! As someone who's completely new to both this community and understanding how taxes work on bonuses, your point about tracking total withholdings throughout the year is really smart. I never thought about creating a spreadsheet to monitor this - that's such a practical way to stay on top of things and reduce anxiety about whether you're on track. Your mention of state taxes is also really helpful since I was so focused on the federal withholding that I didn't even think about what my state might be doing. I'll definitely need to look into my state's approach to supplemental income withholding. It's incredibly reassuring to hear from someone who actually went through the full cycle - from the initial panic when seeing the withholding, to tracking it throughout the year, to finally getting confirmation at tax time that the system worked as promised. That real-world validation gives me so much more confidence about my own situation. Thanks for taking the time to share your experience with us newcomers!
0 coins
Anastasia Popov
As a newcomer to this community, I'm so grateful to have found this discussion! I just received my first bonus last week and was absolutely shocked when I saw that nearly 38% was withheld between federal, state, FICA, and other taxes. Like @Statiia Aarssizan, I was counting on that money for some important expenses and felt like I'd been hit by a freight train. Reading through everyone's explanations has been incredibly reassuring - especially understanding that this is just aggressive withholding, not the actual tax rate I'll pay. The analogy about the payroll system being "overly cautious" really clicked for me. It makes sense that the system would rather withhold too much than risk me owing a huge bill later. I'm planning to use the IRS withholding estimator that several people recommended to get a better sense of my overall tax picture for the year. It's comforting to know that so many others have gone through this exact same confusion and that it all works out properly when filing taxes. This community seems like such a valuable resource for navigating these confusing tax situations - thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge and experiences!
0 coins