


Ask the community...
I'm in almost the exact same situation! Just got laid off after working for about 4 months since my last UI claim ended. Reading through all these responses is really helpful - I was so confused about the quarterly requirements too. @Lucy Taylor - definitely apply online like everyone's saying. I've been putting it off because I wasn't sure if I'd qualify, but it sounds like if you were making decent wages during 2024, you should be fine. The worst they can do is say no, right? Also wanted to add - make sure you have your Social Security card and ID ready when you apply online. I remember from my last claim that the system asks for those right away. Good luck with your application!
@Chloe Mitchell Yes, exactly - the worst they can do is say no! I m'planning to apply tonight actually. Thanks for the tip about having the Social Security card and ID ready. I totally forgot about that from last time. It s'so reassuring to know there are others in the same boat. Hopefully we both get approved quickly! I ll'update this thread once I hear back from EDD.
I just want to add another perspective as someone who works in HR and deals with EDD claims regularly. Your situation sounds very straightforward for qualification - 5 months of steady work at $4,200/month definitely puts you well above the minimum wage requirements. One thing I always tell employees who are filing: when you get to the section about "reason for separation," be very clear that you were laid off due to budget cuts/downsizing. Don't just put "terminated" or "let go" because that can sometimes flag for additional review. The more specific you are about it being an involuntary layoff through no fault of your own, the smoother your claim will process. Also, since you mentioned this is your second time filing, the system should have all your previous employer information on file, which actually makes things easier. Just make sure your new employer's information is entered correctly when you file. You've got this! With your work history and earnings, I'd be shocked if you didn't qualify.
This is such valuable insight from an HR perspective, thank you! I definitely want to be clear about the layoff being due to budget cuts. My manager actually gave me a letter explaining it was a company-wide reduction in force, so I'll reference that when I file. It's good to know that having filed before might actually make the process easier rather than more complicated. Really appreciate the encouragement!
I feel for you - losing 75% of your income with no warning is absolutely terrifying. While others have covered the UI eligibility issues well, I want to emphasize something important: don't let this situation make you feel like you failed as a business owner. Having one client represent that much of your revenue is extremely common in consulting, especially in the early years when you're grateful for steady income. A few things that might help immediately: 1. Draft a professional email to send to your entire network announcing your increased availability. Don't mention the client loss - just position it as expanding capacity for new projects. 2. Consider offering a "new client discount" for Q2 to incentivize quick starts. Sometimes a lower rate that starts immediately is better than full rate that starts in 3 months. 3. Look into your state's small business emergency assistance programs - many states have grant programs specifically for situations like this. The silver lining is that this forced diversification will make your business much more resilient. I know it doesn't feel like it now, but many consultants who've been through this say it was ultimately the best thing that happened to their business structure. You clearly have the skills since you built this once already - now you'll build it back stronger and more stable.
Thank you for such a thoughtful and compassionate response. You're absolutely right that I shouldn't view this as a personal failure - it's easy to spiral into self-blame when you're stressed about money. The idea of framing my outreach as "expanded availability" rather than mentioning the client loss is really smart. I was worried about how to approach that without sounding desperate. The new client discount suggestion is also practical - I'd rather have cash flow at a lower rate than no cash flow at all while I wait for full-rate projects. I'll definitely look into state emergency assistance programs too. Your point about forced diversification making the business stronger really resonates. As scary as this is right now, I can already see how being too dependent on one client was an unsustainable risk that I was ignoring. Thank you for the reminder that I have the skills to rebuild - sometimes when you're in crisis mode, you forget what you're capable of.
I'm going through something similar right now - lost a major client last month who was about 60% of my income. One thing that's helped me while dealing with the EDD situation is creating a "bridge plan" with specific weekly goals. Week 1: reach out to 10 former clients/contacts, Week 2: apply to 5 relevant contract positions, etc. It gives me something concrete to focus on instead of just panicking about money. Also, if you haven't already, check your contract with the client you lost - sometimes there are clauses about notice periods or transition assistance that you might be entitled to. I discovered my contract had a 30-day notice requirement that my client violated, which gave me some leverage to negotiate a small transition payment. For what it's worth, my accountant told me that restructuring to S-corp for next year is definitely worth it, but the payroll processing fees are around $100-150/month, so factor that into your planning. The peace of mind might be worth it though after going through this stress! Hang in there - the fact that you built a successful consultancy once means you can do it again, just with better risk management this time.
I'm a former EDD appeals representative and I can tell you that cases like your sister's are actually quite common - and winnable when prepared properly. The employer's behavior here (initially saying they wouldn't contest, then fabricating warnings) is a major red flag that will not go unnoticed by the Administrative Law Judge. Here's what I'd focus on for your hearing preparation: **Key Legal Point**: California unemployment law requires "misconduct" to be willful, deliberate, or in substantial disregard of the employer's interests. Simply not meeting performance standards - especially under increased workload - does NOT constitute misconduct. **Evidence Priority List**: 1. That termination letter stating "performance issues" (this is your strongest evidence) 2. The two actual written warnings she received and signed 3. Personnel file showing NO additional warnings exist 4. Documentation of increased workload after coworker departure **Hearing Strategy**: - Let the employer present their case first, then systematically address each false claim - When they can't produce the alleged 6 warnings, ask the judge to note this for the record - Emphasize she was terminated for inability to handle an unreasonable workload, not willful misconduct **Critical**: Make sure she continues certifying for benefits during the appeal process - she can receive back pay for all eligible weeks if she wins. The judge will likely find in her favor given the clear documentary evidence contradicting the employer's misconduct claim. Stay organized, stick to facts, and let the employer's lack of evidence speak for itself.
This is incredibly detailed and helpful advice - thank you so much Morgan! Having perspective from someone who actually worked at EDD appeals gives me so much more confidence going into this hearing. The evidence priority list is exactly what we needed to get organized. I'm especially glad you emphasized the legal standard requiring misconduct to be willful/deliberate - that seems to be the core issue here since my sister was clearly trying her best under impossible circumstances. The strategy of letting the employer present first then systematically addressing their false claims makes a lot of sense. We'll definitely make sure to ask the judge to note when they can't produce those alleged warnings. Your point about her continuing to certify is crucial too - I had no idea she could get back pay for all those weeks. This gives us a clear roadmap for preparation. Thank you for taking the time to share your professional insight!
I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now - employer fired me citing "attendance issues" but then told EDD it was misconduct when I applied for unemployment. It's so frustrating how they can just change their story like that! From what I've learned researching my own case, the burden is really on the employer to PROVE misconduct happened. The fact that your sister's termination letter specifically says "performance issues" is huge because that's the employer's own written admission that this wasn't about misconduct. A few things that might help: - In California, employers are supposed to follow progressive discipline policies if they have them - if they skipped steps, that works against their misconduct claim - The timing of when they're producing these "6 warnings" is suspicious - if these were real, why weren't they mentioned in the original termination? - Document everything about the increased workload situation - being unable to handle an unrealistic workload is performance, not misconduct I know it's stressful but from everything I've read, these cases often come down to whether the employee was willfully disregarding their duties vs genuinely trying but falling short of expectations. Your sister's situation with the extra workload sounds like the latter. Stay strong and trust that the truth will come out!
As an update to my earlier response, I want to clarify something important: When certifying for UI benefits with reduced hours, you need to accurately report your work and earnings each week. This is separate from the work search requirement we discussed earlier. Make sure you're reporting all hours worked and gross earnings (before taxes) for each week. Failure to report work and earnings accurately is the most common cause of overpayment notices.
I went through something very similar last year when my retail job cut hours during a store remodel. Here's what I learned: even with a confirmed return date, you absolutely need to keep doing work search activities. I made the mistake of getting lazy about it for a few weeks thinking I was "safe" and EDD flagged my account for an eligibility review. What saved me was that I had been documenting SOME activities - updating my LinkedIn, browsing job boards, etc. The EDD rep told me these count toward your work search requirement even if you're not actively applying. So you don't have to waste employers' time with applications you don't want, but you do need to show you're "available for work" which is a key requirement. My advice: keep a simple log of 3 activities per week (could be as basic as "searched Indeed for 30 minutes" or "updated resume"). When you certify, answer YES to work search and mention your return date in the comments. Better safe than sorry with EDD!
This is exactly the kind of practical advice I was looking for! Thank you for sharing your experience. I like your approach of keeping a simple log - that seems much more manageable than stressing about formal applications when I know my situation is temporary. The idea of logging activities like "searched Indeed for 30 minutes" makes total sense and shows I'm staying engaged without wasting anyone's time. I'll definitely start tracking these smaller activities more systematically. Really appreciate you taking the time to share what worked for you!
KhalilStar
So glad you got it sorted out! This is exactly why I always tell people to double-check the date format issue - it's super common for international folks or anyone who's lived abroad. The MM/DD vs DD/MM mix-up has caught so many people. Really appreciate you posting the update too, it'll help others who run into the same problem. Hope your certification goes smoothly from here on out!
0 coins
Elijah Knight
•This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar registration issue right now and seeing all these solutions gives me hope. The date format thing is really important to know about - I never would have thought of that. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and @GalacticGuardian for following up with the solution. Going to try some of these suggestions myself!
0 coins
Lim Wong
This whole thread is so helpful! I'm bookmarking it for future reference. It's crazy how many different things can go wrong with the EDD registration system - wrong dates, transposed SSN digits, name formatting issues, systems not syncing properly. Really shows how broken their tech infrastructure is. At least there are workarounds and services like Claimyr to help people get through. The fact that we even need third-party services to access our own benefits is pretty ridiculous though. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences and solutions!
0 coins
StarStrider
•Absolutely agree! This thread should be pinned or turned into a FAQ somewhere. I'm new to this whole unemployment process and had no idea there were so many technical gotchas that could trip you up. The date format issue alone probably affects tons of people but isn't mentioned anywhere in the official EDD documentation. Really grateful for communities like this where people actually help each other navigate these systems instead of just complaining (though the complaints are totally justified too!).
0 coins