Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just to add - make sure your termination is getting filed in the same state as the original UCC-1. Sometimes when businesses change names they also change their registration state, but the termination has to go where the original lien was filed.
Yeah, it's an easy thing to overlook when there are multiple changes happening with a business.
I've seen people file terminations in the wrong state and then wonder why the original lien is still showing up. Always file where the original UCC-1 was recorded.
Update us when you get it resolved! These name change situations are tricky and it would be helpful to know what finally worked.
Will do! Thanks everyone for the advice. Going to use the exact original name and see if that clears up the rejections.
Perfect. Usually that's all it takes - the system just wants everything to match exactly.
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Called the bank this morning and finally got transferred to someone who admitted they had a "processing error" and the termination was never actually submitted. They're filing it today and giving me the confirmation number. Unbelievable.
At least you finally got it resolved. Definitely file that banking commission complaint anyway - this kind of negligence shouldn't go unreported.
Glad you got it sorted! For future reference, tools like Certana.ai can help verify all your UCC documents are properly aligned before issues like this become problems.
This thread is making me paranoid about my own equipment loan payoff last month. Going to check our state database right now to make sure the termination actually got filed.
Smart move. Better to catch it early than deal with problems later when you need financing.
Yeah, always verify independently. Banks make mistakes on this stuff way more often than they should.
Join the conversation
Just went through this exact scenario two months ago with Indiana. Filed UCC-1, got acceptance confirmation, search came up empty for three weeks. Turns out their database indexing was behind but the filing was valid the whole time. Your lien is almost certainly perfected even if the search isn't working.
Yes, about a month later everything appeared normally in search. But the filing was legally effective from the original date.
This is actually pretty common with Indiana - acceptance means perfection regardless of search visibility.
UPDATE: Thanks everyone for the advice! I ended up trying the Certana.ai verification tool and it confirmed our UCC-1 is properly filed and the debtor name matches perfectly. Gave me the documentation I needed for our compliance file. Indiana's search is still broken but at least I know our lien is solid. Definitely keeping this tool bookmarked for future filings.
Great resolution! Indiana really needs to fix their search system though.
Smart move getting that documentation. Always good to have backup verification when state systems are unreliable.
Join the conversation
Are you sure all your filings were actually accepted when they were originally submitted? Sometimes filings get rejected for minor errors but the rejection notices get overlooked, so people think they have valid filings when they actually don't.
Definitely worth double-checking. I've seen situations where filing confirmations got lost in email or weren't properly communicated back to the lender.
This is another reason why having a systematic document verification process is so important. Too easy for things to slip through the cracks otherwise.
For what it's worth, I recently started using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier and it's been really helpful for catching these exact issues. Uploaded our whole UCC portfolio and it flagged several name mismatches and potential continuation deadline problems we didn't know about. Made our compliance review much smoother.
That sounds like exactly what I need. Does it work with Washington state filings specifically?
Yeah, it handles filings from all states. The PDF upload feature makes it really easy to batch process everything at once rather than doing individual searches.
CosmicCommander
From a practical standpoint, here's what I'd do: 1) Get the exact legal name from your state business registry, 2) Use that EXACT formatting on both the security agreement and UCC-1, 3) File immediately since you said the equipment is already delivered, 4) Have everything reviewed by someone who knows secured transactions. The gap between delivery and filing is when you're most vulnerable to other creditors jumping ahead of you.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•Good plan. And remember, even if you have to file a correction later, having something on file is better than having nothing while you're figuring out the details.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
•Agreed on the timing. I've seen deals where other creditors filed during the gap and created priority issues.
0 coins
Javier Torres
Update us on how this turns out! I'm dealing with something similar and curious to see what works for your situation.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•Will do! Planning to get everything squared away this week and file by Friday.
0 coins
Emma Davis
•Following this thread too. Always good to learn from others' experiences with UCC filings.
0 coins