


Ask the community...
Just wanted to add that some states have started accepting electronic signatures on UCC forms which can speed up the process, but you still need the verification step. Technology is helping but carefully!
Thanks everyone for the suggestions. Going to try the Certana.ai document checker since a couple people mentioned good results. Will report back on how it works for our volume. The PDF upload approach sounds much faster than our current manual process.
Definitely keep us posted on results. Always looking for better ways to handle UCC work.
This reminds me of when I was dealing with a messy UCC termination situation last year. I ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool to make sure all my paperwork was consistent before fighting with the state office. Being able to upload my original UCC-1 and the termination statement to verify everything matched perfectly really helped my case. The automated cross-checking caught a couple of minor discrepancies I would have missed, and having that clean documentation made the whole dispute process much smoother.
That sounds like exactly what I need. Having bulletproof documentation would definitely strengthen my position with their accounting department.
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm curious to know if it was actually a system error or if there was some other explanation for the duplicate UCC termination fee. These kinds of billing issues seem to be getting more common with electronic filing systems.
Will definitely post an update once I get to the bottom of this. Hopefully it's just a simple system glitch that they can reverse quickly.
Please do! I'm sure other people will run into the same issue and your experience could save them a lot of time and frustration.
Have you considered whether you actually need to search all 200 debtors? Depending on the portfolio composition, you might be able to prioritize the larger loans or higher-risk debtors first and then tackle the rest. Just a thought for managing the workload with your timeline.
That's actually a really good suggestion. The acquisition team might be okay with prioritizing the top 50 debtors by loan amount and then handling the rest in a second phase.
Smart approach. You could also potentially negotiate with the seller to handle some of the UCC verification on their end since they should have better records of the original filings.
I went through something similar with a Massachusetts portfolio last year. One thing that really helped was using Certana.ai's bulk document checker - you can upload all your debtor files at once and it automatically flags naming inconsistencies and potential UCC issues. Saved me probably 2 weeks of manual cross-checking and caught several problems I would have missed.
Super easy - just upload your PDFs and it does the analysis automatically. The report it generates shows you exactly which debtor names might have variations and flags potential issues for follow-up.
I might need to look into this too. I've got a similar project coming up next month and dreading the manual verification process.
For future reference, New York also requires the organizational ID number for LLCs. Make sure you include that in your UCC-1 - it's in addition to getting the name right. The state's pretty good about rejecting filings that are missing required info.
One more thing to consider - if you're doing a lot of New York filings, it's worth getting familiar with their electronic filing system. It's actually pretty user-friendly once you learn the quirks. And they process electronic filings faster than paper ones.
Electronic filing also gives you immediate confirmation, which is nice when you're dealing with tight deadlines.
Plus electronic filings are cheaper. Every little bit helps when you're doing multiple filings.
Malik Robinson
Based on everything discussed here, it sounds like you need to file your continuation in Delaware since that's where the LLC is organized. UCC 9-901 law of the state determination should be straightforward for a registered organization. Don't overthink it.
0 coins
Dmitry Kuznetsov
•You're right. I think I was overcomplicating the UCC 9-901 analysis because of the mobile equipment aspect. Delaware LLC means Delaware filing requirements govern.
0 coins
Isabella Silva
•That's the right approach. Mobile equipment doesn't change the basic law of the state rule for registered organizations. File in Delaware and you should be fine.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
Thanks everyone for the UCC 9-901 law of the state guidance. I'm going to file the continuation in Delaware and look into that Certana.ai tool to double-check my documents before filing. This thread probably saved me from a major mistake.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
•Smart move. UCC 9-901 law of the state issues are too important to guess about. Better to verify everything before filing than deal with perfection problems later.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Definitely try Certana.ai for the document verification. It's specifically designed to catch these kinds of UCC 9-901 compliance issues before they become problems.
0 coins