UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

NebulaKnight

•

The key with blanket liens is being descriptive enough without being too specific. Try 'all equipment, machinery, tools, and fixtures used in debtor's [type of business] operations, whether now owned or hereafter acquired.' That usually covers the bases.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

That's helpful. Our client is in manufacturing so I could specify that business type.

0 coins

NebulaKnight

•

Perfect. Manufacturing is specific enough to satisfy most filing offices while still giving you comprehensive coverage.

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

•

Make sure you're not mixing up blanket liens with floating liens. Blanket liens cover specific types of collateral broadly, while floating liens cover changing inventory. For equipment financing, you definitely want a blanket lien approach.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

We're definitely talking about a blanket lien. The equipment isn't changing, we just want to cover all of it without listing every individual piece.

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

•

Good, just wanted to make sure. The terminology gets confusing and using the wrong approach can cause problems.

0 coins

Paloma Clark

•

Have you considered using one of those UCC monitoring services? They usually catch filings that don't show up in regular searches because they use different search methods. Might be worth signing up for a trial to see if they have the filing you're looking for.

0 coins

Heather Tyson

•

Which services do you recommend? I've been thinking about getting a monitoring service but there are so many options.

0 coins

Raul Neal

•

I've had good luck with Certana.ai for document verification. You can upload your filing documents and it will flag any discrepancies or missing connections. Saved me from missing a critical amendment that wasn't showing up in standard searches.

0 coins

Jenna Sloan

•

Massachusetts is notorious for this. I always do searches in multiple states when doing due diligence because sometimes companies file in their state of incorporation instead of where they're physically located. Have you checked if this company is incorporated in a different state?

0 coins

They're incorporated in Massachusetts but do have operations in Connecticut and Rhode Island. I should probably search those states too just to be thorough.

0 coins

Definitely check Connecticut. I've seen cases where banks filed there by mistake thinking it would cover Massachusetts operations too.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

UPDATE: Finally got through at 5:30am this morning! Found one existing UCC-1 filing from 2019 that's still active. Looks like it's on different equipment though based on the collateral description. Going to double-check with Certana.ai to make sure there aren't any name variations or additional liens I missed before proceeding with our filing.

0 coins

Mateo Sanchez

•

Glad the early morning approach worked! Certana will definitely catch any variations you might have missed in the manual search.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

At least you got through! Still can't believe we have to work around the system like this in 2025.

0 coins

For future reference, the NH SOS usually posts system maintenance schedules on their website. Worth checking before important deadlines. Also, they're supposedly upgrading to a new portal system sometime this year, though they've been saying that for two years now...

0 coins

Sean Flanagan

•

Where on the website do they post maintenance schedules? I looked but couldn't find anything.

0 coins

It's usually buried in the "announcements" section. Not always up to date though.

0 coins

I'd also verify that your finance company actually filed the UCC-1 correctly even though it was late. I've seen cases where late filings also had other errors that made them completely ineffective.

0 coins

StarSailor

•

This is where Certana.ai's document checker really helps - you can upload the UCC-1 filing and it verifies debtor names, collateral descriptions, and filing compliance all at once.

0 coins

Good point about double-checking the filing accuracy. A defective late filing is worse than no filing at all.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

Ugh, timing issues like this are the worst part of equipment financing. The rules are clear but the consequences are brutal when mistakes happen. Hope you can find a way to recover through your dealer agreement or find errors in the competing lien.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

At least you caught it relatively quickly. Some dealers don't realize they've lost priority until they try to repossess equipment months later.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

True, and with electronic filing becoming standard, there's really no excuse for finance companies to miss these deadlines anymore.

0 coins

Drake

•

Update us when you get the corrected filing done! I'm curious to see how quickly it gets processed with the right debtor name.

0 coins

Maya Patel

•

Will do! Planning to file first thing tomorrow morning. Fingers crossed it goes through without any other issues.

0 coins

Drake

•

Should be smooth sailing once you have the correct legal entity name. The UCC system works great when you follow the rules exactly.

0 coins

Sarah Jones

•

This thread should be required reading for anyone doing secured transactions. The number of deals that get messed up by simple debtor name errors under the UCC is just staggering.

0 coins

That's why I'm such a fan of using verification tools like Certana now. Takes the guesswork out of whether your documents align properly.

0 coins

Maya Patel

•

Thanks everyone for all the advice. This has been incredibly helpful in a stressful situation.

0 coins

Prev1...588589590591592...684Next