


Ask the community...
Have you considered using one of those UCC monitoring services? They usually catch filings that don't show up in regular searches because they use different search methods. Might be worth signing up for a trial to see if they have the filing you're looking for.
Which services do you recommend? I've been thinking about getting a monitoring service but there are so many options.
I've had good luck with Certana.ai for document verification. You can upload your filing documents and it will flag any discrepancies or missing connections. Saved me from missing a critical amendment that wasn't showing up in standard searches.
Massachusetts is notorious for this. I always do searches in multiple states when doing due diligence because sometimes companies file in their state of incorporation instead of where they're physically located. Have you checked if this company is incorporated in a different state?
UPDATE: Finally got through at 5:30am this morning! Found one existing UCC-1 filing from 2019 that's still active. Looks like it's on different equipment though based on the collateral description. Going to double-check with Certana.ai to make sure there aren't any name variations or additional liens I missed before proceeding with our filing.
Glad the early morning approach worked! Certana will definitely catch any variations you might have missed in the manual search.
At least you got through! Still can't believe we have to work around the system like this in 2025.
For future reference, the NH SOS usually posts system maintenance schedules on their website. Worth checking before important deadlines. Also, they're supposedly upgrading to a new portal system sometime this year, though they've been saying that for two years now...
I'd also verify that your finance company actually filed the UCC-1 correctly even though it was late. I've seen cases where late filings also had other errors that made them completely ineffective.
This is where Certana.ai's document checker really helps - you can upload the UCC-1 filing and it verifies debtor names, collateral descriptions, and filing compliance all at once.
Ugh, timing issues like this are the worst part of equipment financing. The rules are clear but the consequences are brutal when mistakes happen. Hope you can find a way to recover through your dealer agreement or find errors in the competing lien.
At least you caught it relatively quickly. Some dealers don't realize they've lost priority until they try to repossess equipment months later.
Update us when you get the corrected filing done! I'm curious to see how quickly it gets processed with the right debtor name.
Will do! Planning to file first thing tomorrow morning. Fingers crossed it goes through without any other issues.
Should be smooth sailing once you have the correct legal entity name. The UCC system works great when you follow the rules exactly.
This thread should be required reading for anyone doing secured transactions. The number of deals that get messed up by simple debtor name errors under the UCC is just staggering.
That's why I'm such a fan of using verification tools like Certana now. Takes the guesswork out of whether your documents align properly.
Thanks everyone for all the advice. This has been incredibly helpful in a stressful situation.
NebulaKnight
The key with blanket liens is being descriptive enough without being too specific. Try 'all equipment, machinery, tools, and fixtures used in debtor's [type of business] operations, whether now owned or hereafter acquired.' That usually covers the bases.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•That's helpful. Our client is in manufacturing so I could specify that business type.
0 coins
NebulaKnight
•Perfect. Manufacturing is specific enough to satisfy most filing offices while still giving you comprehensive coverage.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
Make sure you're not mixing up blanket liens with floating liens. Blanket liens cover specific types of collateral broadly, while floating liens cover changing inventory. For equipment financing, you definitely want a blanket lien approach.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•We're definitely talking about a blanket lien. The equipment isn't changing, we just want to cover all of it without listing every individual piece.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
•Good, just wanted to make sure. The terminology gets confusing and using the wrong approach can cause problems.
0 coins