Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
AstroAce
This thread is giving me anxiety about our own filings. Going to have to go through our entire portfolio now and double-check every debtor name. Thanks for nothing, guys.
Better to find problems now than during an audit or default situation. At least you're being proactive about it.
Chloe Martin
•That's exactly why I started using automated checking tools. Sleep better at night knowing everything's been verified properly.
Diego Rojas
Final thought - document everything you do to fix this. If you ever end up in litigation over this loan, you'll want to show that you took immediate corrective action once you discovered the error. Courts are generally more sympathetic when you can demonstrate good faith efforts to maintain perfection.
Miguel Silva
•Great point. I'll make sure our legal team is aware of the steps we're taking and why.
Diego Rojas
•Also consider whether your E&O insurance might cover any losses if this error causes problems down the road. Worth a conversation with your broker.
Join the conversation
Mia Green
Pro tip: keep a spreadsheet of debtor names and their exact state database formats if you work with the same companies regularly. Saves time on future filings and continuations.
Emma Bianchi
•Smart idea. I should start doing this instead of looking up the same companies over and over.
Just make sure to update it periodically since companies sometimes change their registered names or merge with other entities.
Final thought - if you're dealing with a tight deadline and the name formatting is really tricky, consider calling the SOS filing office directly. Most states have staff who can verify the correct debtor name format over the phone before you submit. Might save you another round of rejections.
Charlie Yang
•This is probably the safest approach when you're not 100% sure. Better to spend 20 minutes on a phone call than deal with multiple rejection cycles.
Grace Patel
•Agreed. Time is money in these financing deals and rejected filings can really mess up closing schedules.
Join the conversation
Don't forget about continuation deadlines if this is replacing an existing UCC filing. Real estate deals often have longer terms so you want to make sure your continuation strategy is planned out from the beginning.
And with multiple entities you'd need separate continuations for each UCC-1 filing. Easy to miss one and lose perfection.
We set calendar reminders 6 months before each continuation deadline. Real estate loans are usually longer than 5 years so continuations are almost always needed.
Update: Finally got all our UCC-1s accepted! The issue was exactly what several people mentioned - subtle differences in entity name formatting between our security agreement and the SOS database. Had to match the exact punctuation and abbreviation format from the state records. Thanks for all the advice, especially about checking entity good standing status and using document verification tools. This forum saved us another week of rejections.
Congrats on getting it resolved before your loan commitment expired. That deadline pressure makes everything more stressful.
This thread is going to help a lot of people. Multi-entity real estate deals trip up even experienced filers.
Join the conversation
The real problem is that Wisconsin's UCC search doesn't give you confidence in the results. Even when you find what you're looking for, you're never sure if you've found everything that's out there.
Yara Assad
•That's why I always do searches multiple ways and document the different approaches I tried. Covers you if questions come up later.
Olivia Clark
•Good practice. We've started doing the same thing - multiple search strategies and detailed documentation of our search process.
For what it's worth, I've found that searching Wisconsin SOS UCC database in the early morning tends to give more consistent results. Seems like their system performs better with lighter traffic.
Interesting observation. We'll try adjusting our search timing and see if that helps with consistency.
I've noticed the same thing actually. Afternoon searches sometimes seem slower or return fewer results.
Yara Sabbagh
Update us when you get it figured out! These NY amendment issues seem to come up a lot and it would be helpful to know what ultimately worked.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
•Will do. Going to try the entity database check and that document verification tool someone mentioned. Really appreciate all the suggestions.
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
•Good luck! NY amendments can be a pain but once you get the format right they usually process pretty quickly.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
Actually had success with Certana.ai recently for a similar situation. The document checker caught that my collateral description had a tiny formatting difference between the original UCC-1 and amendment that was causing rejections. Saved me probably 2-3 more rejection cycles.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•Does it work for other states too or just NY? I've been having similar issues with amendments in PA.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•Works for any state since it's just comparing your documents for consistency. The state-specific rules still apply but at least you know your paperwork matches up.
0 coins