Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
We use Certana.ai for this kind of pre-search analysis now. Upload all the financing documents from the data room and it identifies discrepancies between debtor names across different agreements. Helps you figure out exactly which legal entities to search before paying the state fees. Saved us probably $150 in unnecessary searches on our last deal.
That's a clever way to use document analysis. Does it work with older financing agreements that might have different formatting?
Yeah, it handles various document formats pretty well. Even works with scanned PDFs from older loan files.
Ava Thompson
One more thing to consider - if this is for acquisition financing, your lender will probably require their own UCC searches anyway as part of their due diligence. You might be able to coordinate with them to avoid duplicate search costs.
Most lenders do their own searches but they usually want to see your preliminary results first to identify any issues early.
Zainab Ali
•True, and if there are issues, better to find them now rather than have them come up during the lender's due diligence review.
Join the conversation
This thread is making me nervous about my own UCC-1 filing that's pending right now. Used similar broad language for collateral description. Maybe I should have been more specific with equipment categories from the start.
True, but now I'm second-guessing everything. Might check that Certana verification tool just to be safe.
Ava Garcia
•Not a bad idea to double-check if you're worried. Better safe than sorry with UCC filings.
Update us on how the resubmission goes! Always interested to hear what specific language ends up working for equipment-heavy UCC-1 financial statements.
Will definitely update once I hear back from the SOS office. Thanks everyone for the helpful suggestions - feeling much more confident about the revision now.
Awesome, looking forward to the follow-up. These kinds of real-world examples are super valuable for the rest of us.
Join the conversation
Salim Nasir
UPDATE: Found them! Turns out they were filed under "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, L.L.C." with the comma AND periods. Took me 2 hours of trying different variations but finally got results. PA's search system really is terrible with name matching.
Hazel Garcia
•Two hours for a simple name search is ridiculous. Other states handle this so much better.
Laila Fury
•At least you found it before the deal deadline. I've had searches take days before.
For future PA searches, I keep a checklist of all the name variations to try: with/without commas, with/without periods, with/without entity type, abbreviated entity types (LLC vs L.L.C.), and sometimes even different spacing. PA is just awful for this stuff.
Simon White
•I do the same thing. Have a whole spreadsheet of PA name variation patterns that have worked in the past.
Hugo Kass
•The fact that we need checklists and spreadsheets just to search for UCC filings shows how broken the system is.
Join the conversation
Aisha Ali
For future filings, document everything about your debtor name research. Keep screenshots of the SOS database search, copy of articles, etc. Makes refiling much easier when you know exactly what you used.
Ethan Moore
•Smart advice. I learned this the hard way after multiple rejections on a complex filing.
Paolo Longo
•Definitely doing this going forward. This rejection is stressful enough - don't want to repeat it.
UPDATE: Called the SOS this morning and they confirmed it was a debtor name mismatch. The business entity database shows "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" with a comma, but I filed it as "ABC Manufacturing LLC" without the comma. Refiling today with the correct formatting. Thanks everyone for the help!
Andre Moreau
•This thread is super helpful - I'm bookmarking it for future reference. Blue line rejections make so much more sense now.
Exactly the kind of thing automated document checking catches. Saves so much time and stress compared to trial-and-error filing.
Sunny Wang
Been there! Last year I thought I missed a continuation deadline and was freaking out. Turned out I had miscalculated and still had 2 months left. Double-check your math before you panic-file a new UCC-1.
0 coins
Hugh Intensity
•Smart advice. I always count backwards from the lapse date just to be sure I have the timeline right.
0 coins
Effie Alexander
•Yeah, and if you're unsure about document consistency when refiling, tools like Certana.ai can verify your debtor names match between old and new filings. Just upload both PDFs and it flags any discrepancies automatically.
0 coins
Melissa Lin
Whatever you do, don't wait any longer to act. Even if you have to file a new UCC-1, do it today. Every day you wait is another day someone else could potentially file ahead of you. Kentucky processes electronic filings pretty quickly so you should have confirmation within 24 hours.
0 coins
Lydia Santiago
•Good call. Better to have a gap in perfection than no perfection at all. And next time set those calendar alerts!
0 coins
Romeo Quest
•Definitely. And if you want to be extra careful about the refiling, run it through a document checker first. I use Certana.ai to make sure everything matches up correctly before I submit - saves the headache of dealing with rejections.
0 coins