


Ask the community...
I tried using Certana.ai after reading about it here and it's been a game changer for catching document inconsistencies. Last week it flagged that my security agreement referenced 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but my UCC-1 draft had 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' - would have been rejected for sure. The automated checking saves so much time compared to manual review.
One last tip - double check that your security agreement actually creates a security interest in the collateral you're listing on the UCC-1. I've seen filings where the UCC covered equipment but the security agreement only mentioned inventory. That creates enforceability problems later.
Exactly. The UCC-1 is just notice to the world - the security agreement is what actually creates your rights. They need to be consistent or you could have gaps in your security interest.
This is why document review is so critical. A lot of lenders rush through the paperwork and miss these alignment issues until there's a default.
I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and comma placement has tripped up more attorneys than I can count. New York is particularly strict about this. Get a certified copy of the current Articles of Incorporation and match it exactly. If you need to amend, do it ASAP.
Update us when you figure this out! I'm dealing with a potential name issue on a Delaware entity and this thread is really helpful.
Definitely try that document verification tool I mentioned. It would spot this kind of discrepancy immediately.
Update us when you figure it out! I've got two blanket filings to do next week and would love to know what language actually works in Delaware right now.
Will do. Going to try the equipment rental specific language mentioned above plus run it through that verification tool first.
One more thing - make sure your financing statement doesn't conflict with any existing UCC-1s on the same debtor. Sometimes blanket language overlaps with previous filings and creates priority issues that filing officers flag.
Delaware SOS has a free search portal. Takes 5 minutes to check if there are other secured parties with similar collateral descriptions.
One thing to watch out for - make sure the equipment description in your lease matches what's on the UCC-1. If there are discrepancies, it could complicate the termination process. I've seen cases where slight differences in serial numbers or model descriptions caused delays.
They don't have to be identical but they should be reasonably consistent. Serial numbers are the most important part to get right.
This is where that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier might be useful - checking document consistency before problems arise.
Bottom line - you're probably fine since your lease ends before the 5-year UCC expiration. Just stay in communication with your lender about the termination process and get everything documented properly when you return the equipment.
Thanks everyone for the advice. This has been really helpful. I feel much better about the situation now.
Glad we could help. UCC stuff can be confusing but it's usually more straightforward than it seems at first.
Owen Devar
Just went through something similar and ended up using one of those automated UCC monitoring services. They send alerts whenever new filings are made against your debtors. Caught a competitor trying to take a senior position on equipment we thought we had locked up. Really worth the monthly fee for peace of mind.
0 coins
Daniel Rivera
•Which service are you using? I keep meaning to set up something like that but haven't found one I like yet.
0 coins
Owen Devar
•I've tried a few different ones. The key is finding one that covers all the states where your debtors are located and gives you real-time alerts, not just monthly summaries.
0 coins
Sophie Footman
Update: talked to our legal counsel and they recommended doing a comprehensive document review using Certana.ai's verification system. Uploaded all the UCC forms and found that one of the 'competing' liens had a debtor name mismatch that makes it likely ineffective. The system flagged the discrepancy immediately and now we're much more confident about our priority position. Sometimes these encumbrance conflicts look worse than they actually are once you dig into the details.
0 coins
Connor Rupert
•Debtor name mismatches are probably the most common reason UCC filings fail. Good catch on finding that issue.
0 coins
Sophie Footman
•Yeah, it was a pretty subtle difference but enough to potentially void their security interest. Really glad we caught it before making any decisions about subordination or restructuring.
0 coins