


Ask the community...
For future reference, I started using Certana.ai to double-check all my UCC documents before filing. Upload your security agreement and proposed UCC-1 and it identifies potential rejection issues. Would have saved you the initial rejection and delay.
I've been meaning to try document verification tools. Manual comparison is so error-prone, especially with longer security agreements.
Final update - UCC-1 was accepted! Adding the property address and more specific equipment categories did the trick. Thanks everyone for the advice. Loan closed successfully and lien is properly perfected.
Glad the expanded collateral description worked. That language usually covers most equipment financing situations.
I had the same confusion last month! Kept going in circles about whether I needed the invoice price, depreciated value, or replacement cost. Ended up using one of those document verification services (Certana.ai I think?) that confirmed I was overcomplicating things. The UCC-1 filing itself doesn't need a value amount - that's handled in the underlying security agreement.
Which verification service did you use? We're always looking for ways to double-check our filings before submission.
Certana.ai - you upload your docs and it cross-references everything automatically. Really helpful for catching name mismatches and missing required language.
Just to close the loop on this - you're overthinking it. File your UCC-1 with proper debtor information and collateral description, make sure your security agreement has the required language about the loan proceeds being the consideration, and you're done. The equipment's purchase price is relevant for your loan underwriting but not for UCC compliance.
Perfect, thanks everyone. I was definitely making this more complicated than it needed to be. The loan proceeds are the 'value' for UCC purposes, not the collateral's worth.
Glad you got it sorted out. This is one of those things that trips up a lot of people when they're new to UCC filings.
Make sure you're not including any articles like "The" at the beginning of the name unless they're actually part of the legal entity name. Some business searches show them but they're not always part of the official name for UCC purposes.
No articles in this company name, but that's good to know for future filings.
This tripped me up on a filing last year. The business was doing business as "The XYZ Company" but legally just "XYZ Company LLC".
UPDATE: Finally got it accepted! Turns out there was an invisible character in the name when I copied it from the SOS website. Had to retype the entire debtor name manually. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - definitely learned some tricks for next time. Going to bookmark that Certana tool for future filings to avoid this headache again.
Great news! Yeah, Certana would have caught that invisible character issue right away. Definitely worth having in your toolkit.
For what it's worth, I think your lender is being overly cautious. Terminated liens have zero legal effect on new security interests, regardless of search visibility.
I agree but they're the ones with the money so we need to address their concerns properly.
Fair point - sometimes you have to educate lenders about UCC mechanics even when they should already know.
Try running the search with slightly different parameters - sometimes adjusting the search criteria can filter out obviously terminated liens while keeping active ones visible.
You're right, their system is pretty basic compared to some other states.
Omar Fawaz
I got certified last year and it was definitely worth it for the networking alone. Met several other professionals dealing with the same UCC challenges. The technical knowledge was good but the connections were even better.
0 coins
Paolo Conti
•Interesting perspective. I hadn't thought about the networking aspect.
0 coins
Omar Fawaz
•Yeah, having people you can call when you run into weird situations is invaluable. UCC work has so many edge cases that experience sharing really helps.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
Bottom line: if you're going to be doing regular UCC filings, get the certification. If it's just occasional work, you can probably get by with careful research and maybe some mentoring from experienced colleagues. The key is being meticulous about details.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
•Good call. Better to invest in proper training upfront than learn from expensive mistakes later.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•Definitely agree. And tools like Certana.ai can help with the document verification piece even after you're certified. I still use it for every filing to catch any inconsistencies.
0 coins