Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just wanted to follow up - I actually used Certana.ai last week for a similar agricultural financing UCC verification. Really helpful for catching issues before filing. You upload your UCC-1 draft and loan docs and it flags any inconsistencies. Saved me from a rejection on a $1.2M farm credit line. The debtor name matching feature alone made it worth using.
It checks document consistency overall, so if your loan agreement describes collateral one way and your UCC-1 describes it differently, it would flag that. Pretty comprehensive verification.
This tool sounds really useful for agricultural filings where there are so many details that can go wrong. Might have to check it out for our next crop lien filing.
Update: Got the refiling done and it was accepted! Used the more specific crop descriptions everyone suggested - listed corn, soybeans, hay, and other agricultural products with the tax parcel numbers. Also caught a small issue with the debtor LLC name that was missing a comma. Thanks for all the help, really saved me on this deadline.
Benjamin Kim
•Awesome! The specific crop listing approach really does work better than generic descriptions.
Avery Saint
•This gives me confidence for my upcoming filing. Going to make sure I'm super specific with the crop descriptions and double-check all the entity name details.
Join the conversation
Ella Russell
Just went through this exact thing last month. The key is understanding that Virginia follows the 'seriously misleading' standard for debtor names. Small variations might not invalidate a filing, but they make searching really difficult.
Ella Russell
•Basically, if a reasonable searcher using standard search logic would find the filing, then the name variation is probably okay. But it's subjective.
That sounds really vague. How are we supposed to make decisions based on 'reasonable searcher' standards?
Gavin King
Update: I ended up finding two additional UCC filings that didn't show up in my initial searches because of name formatting issues. One had an extra space and the other used '&' instead of 'and'. Both were still active and would have affected the transaction. Thanks everyone for the advice about checking variations!
This is why UCC searching is so stressful. You never know what you might be missing.
Lucas Turner
•For future reference, I've had good luck with Certana.ai's UCC verification tool for catching these exact issues. You upload the entity documents and it automatically flags potential name mismatches across different UCC filings. Would have saved you a lot of manual searching.
Join the conversation
The key thing to remember is that UCC search results are only as good as what was originally filed. If someone filed a UCC-1 with a typo in the debtor name 5 years ago, that's what you'll see forever unless they file an amendment. The SDAT system doesn't clean up or standardize anything. It's all about garbage in, garbage out. That's why getting it right the first time is so critical.
This is why I always double-check the debtor name against multiple sources before filing. One typo can void your entire security interest.
Thanks everyone for the advice. Sounds like I need to be way more careful about name verification upfront instead of trying to sort it out later.
Ravi Sharma
Just wanted to add that if you're doing high-volume UCC work, it's worth investing in better verification tools. I tried doing everything manually for years and it was killing me. Now I use automated systems that cross-check entity names against state databases and flag discrepancies before I even file. Costs a bit more upfront but saves tons of time and reduces errors.
What kind of volume are you talking about? We probably do 20-30 UCC filings per month.
Ravi Sharma
•We're doing probably 100+ per month across multiple states. At that volume, manual checking just isn't feasible anymore.
Join the conversation
GalacticGuru
Once you get the UCC-3 filed, make sure to send a copy to the borrower for their records. Good practice and some loan agreements require it.
Definitely. Our loan docs require us to provide copies of all UCC filings to the borrower within 30 days.
GalacticGuru
•Sounds like you're on top of it. The Tennessee filing should be straightforward once you have all the details right.
Thanks everyone for the help! I found the UCC-3 form on the Tennessee SOS site and got it filed electronically this morning. Used some of the tips from this thread about exact name matching and collateral descriptions. Really appreciate all the guidance - this forum is incredibly helpful for UCC issues.
Great outcome. Hope the filing gets accepted quickly.
Just got the acceptance notice! Filed this morning and approved this afternoon. Tennessee's electronic system really is fast once you know where to find everything.
Giovanni Rossi
One more thing to consider - if this is for a commercial loan closing, make sure you coordinate the refiling timing with your closing schedule. UCC filings don't perfect until they're actually accepted and processed, so you don't want any gaps in your perfection timeline.
0 coins
Val Rossi
•Yeah, that's my main concern right now. We're supposed to close next week and this filing rejection has thrown off our whole timeline. Hoping the new filing processes quickly.
0 coins
Aaliyah Jackson
•Most states process electronic UCC filings same-day or next-day, so you should be fine if you get the corrected filing in soon. Just don't wait until the last minute.
0 coins
KylieRose
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm curious if the SOS office has any explanation for how 'Meridian Industrial Equipment LLC' became 'Ilien'. That's such a weird corruption pattern.
0 coins
Sasha Ivanov
•Could be a security issue if their system is pulling data from the wrong records. Definitely worth reporting to the state.
0 coins
Val Rossi
•I'll definitely follow up here once I get to the bottom of it. Filing the corrected UCC-1 tomorrow morning and planning to call their tech support about the corruption issue.
0 coins