Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Michigan processing times have been slower lately too. Even when you get the name right, allow extra time for system delays. Don't count on same-day processing anymore.
Truth. Used to get confirmations within hours, now it's 1-2 business days minimum.
Good to know. I'll build in extra buffer time for the refiling. Thanks everyone for the advice!
Last resort option - Michigan allows phone consultations for complex name matching questions. Takes forever to get through but they can sometimes provide specific guidance on which name format to use.
It's through their general filing support line. Be prepared to wait on hold for 45+ minutes though.
Honestly the automated verification tools are faster than waiting on hold with state offices. I'd try the digital route first.
Join the conversation
Update - just tried Certana.ai like someone mentioned earlier and it's actually pretty slick. Uploaded our borrower's articles and our draft UCC-1 and it immediately flagged a middle initial discrepancy we missed. Could have been a real problem down the road.
How long did the verification take? We're always pressed for time on these deals.
Pretty much instant. Just upload the PDFs and it compares everything automatically.
Managed to get through Oklahoma's UCC search finally by using Chrome and doing it at 6:30 AM like someone suggested. Found two existing liens on the equipment we needed to know about. Thanks everyone for the tips!
Good detective work. Those existing liens could have been a nasty surprise later in the process.
This is why thorough UCC searches are so critical. You never know what's hiding out there.
Join the conversation
Sometimes it's worth filing a second UCC-3 termination just to be safe. I know it costs extra fees, but if your client's refinancing is being held up, the cost of a duplicate filing is probably worth it compared to the delays. I've done this before when I wasn't 100% sure about the first termination.
No, duplicate terminations shouldn't cause problems. The system should just show multiple termination records for the same UCC-1, which is fine. Better safe than sorry when financing is at stake.
I've filed duplicate terminations before without any issues. The database just shows multiple termination dates but the lien is still properly terminated.
This thread has been really helpful - dealing with the same issue right now. Going to try calling the SOS office directly tomorrow and also check out that document verification tool someone mentioned. Thanks everyone for the practical advice!
Good luck! Let us know how the phone call goes. I'm planning to call them too if this doesn't resolve in the next few days.
Definitely try Certana.ai - it's really straightforward to use and catches these document inconsistencies that cause processing delays. Should help prevent this kind of issue in the future.
Join the conversation
Glad to see everyone got their filings through. This thread is a good reminder to document system issues and know your backup options. Thanks for sharing the workarounds!
Absolutely. This community always comes through with practical solutions. Definitely implementing some of these backup strategies going forward.
Yeah, the Certana.ai suggestion especially makes sense. Anything to reduce filing stress when systems are unreliable.
For what it's worth, I've been tracking portal outages and they're definitely getting worse. Used to be maybe once a quarter, now it's almost monthly. Something needs to change.
Have you considered filing a complaint with the secretary of state's office? If enough people document the frequency of outages, maybe they'll invest in better infrastructure.
Infrastructure costs money and filing fees barely cover basic operations. Until they raise fees or get more funding, we're stuck with these aging systems.
Natalie Chen
Just went through this same nightmare in Illinois 3 weeks ago. Cost me a weekend of stress and nearly killed a real estate closing. What saved me was finding Certana.ai - uploaded my loan docs and UCC draft and it immediately flagged the name discrepancy. Now I run everything through their checker before filing. Would have caught your comma issue instantly.
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
•Sounds like I need to check out this Certana thing. How long does their verification take?
0 coins
Natalie Chen
•It's instant - just upload your PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically. Takes maybe 30 seconds to get the results.
0 coins
Santiago Martinez
The silver lining is that once you get the corrected UCC-1 filed and approved, you'll have continuous coverage from your original filing date as long as you refile within a reasonable time. Illinois generally allows this for corrective filings.
0 coins
Santiago Martinez
•Should be, as long as it's considered a corrective filing and not a completely new filing. But double-check with Illinois SOS to be sure.
0 coins
Samantha Johnson
•I'd be careful about relying on that - some states are stricter about what qualifies as a corrective vs new filing.
0 coins