Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just an update - I ended up doing both a manual search and hiring a professional search company. Found two old UCC-1 filings that the borrower wasn't aware of, but both had lapsed without continuation so they're no longer valid liens. Still glad I checked thoroughly before filing our UCC-1. Thanks everyone for the advice!
Perfect example of why it's worth taking the time to do a thorough search upfront. Glad it worked out for you!
This thread has been super helpful. I'm bookmarking it for the next time I need to do a comprehensive UCC search.
This is such a valuable discussion! As someone new to equipment financing, I'm learning so much about the complexities of UCC searches. The point about blanket liens covering "all equipment" is particularly eye-opening - I can see how borrowers might genuinely not realize they have existing liens that could affect new financing. The suggestion to search under previous business names and DBA variations seems crucial too. I'm curious - for those of you who've dealt with this before, how far back do you typically search? Are there any time limits on how old a UCC filing can be and still create issues for new liens?
Join the conversation
Bottom line - you need to identify the specific UCC filing that's causing the hold, then get it properly terminated or prove it's already lapsed. Don't let your lender leave you hanging with vague explanations about 'UCC holds' without giving you the specific details to resolve it.
Good plan. And if they give you any pushback, remind them they have a legal obligation to file terminations after payoff.
Also document everything. Keep records of all your communications in case you need to escalate or take legal action to get the lien released.
As someone who's dealt with UCC complications before, I'd recommend also checking if there are multiple UCC filings under different variations of your business name or EIN. Sometimes lenders file under slightly different entity names, and you might have missed one when you thought everything was cleared. Also, if you're in a rush, you can sometimes get an estoppel letter from the original lender stating the debt is satisfied - this can help your new bank move forward while the formal UCC-3 termination is being processed. The key is being proactive and not waiting for the lenders to handle this automatically.
This is really helpful advice, especially about the estoppel letter! I hadn't thought about there potentially being multiple filings under different name variations. Given that my business did reorganize as an LLC, there could definitely be filings under both the old and new entity names that I need to track down.
Join the conversation
Document authentication standards keep changing as states update their systems. What worked six months ago might not work today, especially for esignature compliance under 9-105.
The constant changes are why automated validation tools are becoming essential. At least they stay updated with current requirements.
Exactly. Manual compliance checking can't keep up with all the technical changes anymore.
I've been through this exact nightmare with UCC-1 filings getting bounced for 9-105 esignature issues. The key thing that finally worked for us was switching to DocuSign's "Advanced Authentication" mode specifically for UCC documents. Regular email verification isn't enough - you need to enable SMS verification plus knowledge-based authentication questions. Also make sure your DocuSign account has the "Legal Document Compliance" add-on activated, which handles the certificate embedding properly so Adobe won't show signature warnings. Most law firms don't realize there are different compliance tiers within DocuSign itself. Worth asking your attorneys to check their account settings before the next submission attempt.
Join the conversation
One more thing - make sure you understand the difference between filed liens and perfected liens. Just because something is filed doesn't mean it's necessarily valid, but you'd need a lawyer to determine that. For equipment purchases, assume any filed lien is valid unless proven otherwise.
Could be issues with the underlying security agreement, problems with the collateral description, or the debt being paid off but not properly terminated. Complex stuff that needs legal review.
This is why I always use Certana.ai to double-check my document analysis. Upload the UCC filings and it flags potential issues with the paperwork that I might miss.
Great thread! One additional tip - if you're buying equipment from a company in financial distress or bankruptcy, definitely check the federal bankruptcy court records too. Sometimes equipment gets tied up in bankruptcy proceedings even if there aren't traditional UCC liens filed. I've seen buyers think they're clear after doing state UCC searches only to find out the equipment is part of a bankruptcy estate. PACER searches can be tedious but worth it for high-value purchases.
That's a really important point about bankruptcy proceedings! I hadn't thought about federal court records. How do you search PACER effectively for equipment-specific information? Is it just a matter of searching by the company name or are there specific case types to look for?
@eb792822e6f9 This is such valuable advice! For PACER searches, I'd recommend starting with Chapter 11 and Chapter 7 cases under the debtor's name. Look for any mentions of "equipment," "machinery," or "assets" in the case documents. Also check for any orders regarding asset sales or Section 363 motions - those can tell you if equipment is being sold through the bankruptcy court. The automatic stay in bankruptcy can complicate equipment purchases even if no specific liens show up in UCC searches.
Andre Dupont
Final advice: Use your exact charter name, list specific vehicle details in collateral description, file in Texas, and stop worrying about travel rights theories. You've got this!
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•Perfect. You'll have that UCC-1 filed smoothly with this approach.
0 coins
Diego Fernández
•Good luck with the filing! Feel free to update us on how it goes.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
As a newcomer to UCC filings, this discussion has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I need to file a UCC-1 for equipment financing, and I was also getting confused by some of the misleading information online about travel rights. It's clear now that for commercial secured transactions, I need to focus on three key things: getting the exact debtor name from organizational documents, providing specific collateral descriptions, and filing in the state where the business entity is organized. The Certana.ai tool that several people mentioned sounds like it could save a lot of headaches with document verification. Thanks to everyone who contributed - this thread should be required reading for anyone new to UCC filings!
0 coins
Drake
•Welcome to the community! You're absolutely right that this thread is a goldmine for UCC filing basics. I'm also relatively new to secured transactions and found myself going down the same rabbit holes with misleading online information. It's refreshing to see experienced practitioners like Diego, Anastasia, and others cut through the noise and focus on what actually matters. The three-point checklist you mentioned is spot on - I'm bookmarking this discussion for future reference. Have you looked into the Certana.ai tool yet? I'm curious about trying it for my next filing.
0 coins