


Ask the community...
UPDATE: Just got through on CSC after trying for 3 hours. System seems to be working again but very slow. If you're still having issues, they told me their engineers are working on 'connectivity issues' and expect full resolution by end of day.
Debtor verification worked fine once I got to that step. The main issue was just getting the initial login to work properly.
This is a perfect example of why you need document verification tools in your workflow. I started using Certana.ai after a similar CSC outage caused me to file with incorrect debtor information. Now I verify everything before it goes to any filing service. Upload your charter and UCC docs and it catches any inconsistencies instantly.
I'm still skeptical about third-party verification services. How do we know they're not just checking basic formatting?
The key thing is making sure your UCC collateral description doesn't conflict with what's actually in your loan agreement. Sometimes lawyers get creative with the UCC language and it doesn't match the security agreement terms exactly.
Quick update - took everyone's advice and rewrote the collateral description with specific equipment categories and removed the conditional language. Also used the Certana verification tool to make sure everything matched our loan docs. Filing was accepted this morning! Thanks for all the help.
Perfect timing with your closing next week. Nothing worse than UCC filing delays holding up a loan closing.
This gives me hope for my inventory filing. Going to try the specific categories approach too.
The debtor name issue is definitely your biggest concern. I've seen courts rule that missing punctuation makes a UCC filing seriously misleading, which essentially voids your perfected security interest. You need to get that corrected ASAP with a UCC-3 amendment.
You could try that argument but it's risky. Ohio follows the 'exact match' standard pretty strictly. Better to file the amendment and have clean documentation than try to argue the point later if you need to enforce your security interest.
I actually just went through this with Certana.ai's document checker on a similar filing issue. It immediately flagged the name mismatch between our corporate charter and UCC-1, saved us from finding out the hard way during a default. Really wish I'd used it before the original filing.
This thread is making me paranoid about all my filings now. Going to go back and double-check every debtor name against the state records. Better safe than sorry with these UCC requirements.
Same here, this discussion is a good reminder to audit our existing filings. UCC mistakes are expensive mistakes.
Quick question - for the $2.3M facility, are you doing a single UCC-1 or separate filings for each type of collateral? The equipment vs inventory distinction might matter for the collateral description.
Planning on a single comprehensive filing with detailed collateral descriptions for both equipment and inventory. Should be fine under 9-104 since it's all one debtor in one filing state.
That should work fine. Just make sure your collateral descriptions are specific enough to satisfy Delaware's requirements.
Bottom line - Delaware filing is definitely correct under UCC 9-104. I'd also recommend double-checking your collateral descriptions and debtor name formatting before submitting. Maybe run it through one of those document verification tools to catch any issues beforehand.
Good luck with the filing! Delaware usually processes pretty quickly so you should have confirmation well before your closing deadline.
Let us know how it goes. Always interested to hear about successful multistate filings.
QuantumQuest
I hate Delaware's UCC portal SO MUCH. The error messages are completely useless and their form validation is inconsistent. Filed the same addendum three times with tiny changes each time before it finally went through.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•Had to completely rewrite the collateral description using their exact template language from the help section. Apparently my perfectly clear description wasn't formatted the way their system expected.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Their templates are buried so deep in the help section too. Should be right on the filing page.
0 coins
Yara Haddad
Last resort suggestion - try using the paper form instead of the online portal. Sometimes the electronic filing has validation bugs that don't exist on paper filings. Takes longer but might save you multiple rejection cycles.
0 coins
Giovanni Gallo
•Definitely worth checking your docs first. The Certana verification caught issues I never would have spotted manually.
0 coins
Yara Haddad
•Good plan. Paper filing is really a last resort but sometimes necessary when the portal is being difficult.
0 coins