UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Remember that 9-622 is just the start. Once you send the notice and wait out the required period, you still need to conduct the disposition in a commercially reasonable manner. Document everything about your sale process too - advertising, bidding procedures, price negotiations, all of it.

0 coins

Exactly. And if there's a deficiency, you'll need to prove commercial reasonableness to collect it. Better to over-document than under-document.

0 coins

Xan Dae

Commercial reasonableness is such a fact-specific standard. What's reasonable for one type of collateral might not be for another.

0 coins

Has anyone dealt with 9-622 notices where the debtor filed bankruptcy right after receiving notice? Wondering how that affects the enforcement timeline and whether the automatic stay kicks in immediately.

0 coins

That's what I was afraid of. Adds months to the process depending on which chapter they file.

0 coins

Hopefully our debtor doesn't go that route but good to know in case they do. Thanks for bringing it up.

0 coins

Update: We decided to refile the UCC-1 with the exact debtor name from state records (including the comma). Used one of those document checking tools mentioned earlier to verify everything matched perfectly before submitting. The new filing was accepted within hours and our lender is satisfied. Thanks for all the advice - better safe than sorry with IP security!

0 coins

Great outcome. This is exactly why we always recommend being conservative with debtor names on high-value IP deals.

0 coins

Huge relief! The closing went smoothly and everyone was confident in the perfected security interest. Definitely learned my lesson about debtor name accuracy.

0 coins

This thread should be required reading for anyone doing IP security work. The number of deals I've seen with perfection issues due to sloppy UCC filings is staggering.

0 coins

Absolutely agree. IP security agreements require extra attention to detail because the collateral is so valuable but intangible.

0 coins

I'm bookmarking this discussion for future reference. Great real-world example of how to handle debtor name issues correctly.

0 coins

For what it's worth, I've never seen a UCC challenged successfully based on address discrepancies in Kansas. The courts understand that the Secretary of State's system has these display issues. Your security interest is almost certainly fine.

0 coins

That's exactly what I needed to hear. Thanks for the real-world perspective on how courts actually handle these situations.

0 coins

Agreed. The case law is pretty clear that minor address variations don't invalidate filings when the debtor name is sufficient for identification purposes.

0 coins

Update on this - just got off the phone with Kansas SOS and they confirmed this is a known display issue. They said the actual filed documents have the correct information and the search results sometimes pull addresses from different database fields. They're supposedly working on a fix but no timeline. At least I can stop worrying about it now!

0 coins

Lol 'working on a fix with no timeline' - government speak for 'maybe we'll get to it in 2030

0 coins

Thanks for making that call and reporting back. Really appreciate everyone's help on this thread - saved me a lot of stress and probably an unnecessary amendment filing!

0 coins

Just want to echo what others said about checking the official entity records first. I made the mistake once of using the name from a contract instead of the Secretary of State database and it caused a huge mess. Now I always verify against official records before drafting any written security agreement.

0 coins

Good reminder. The contracts team doesn't always use the exact legal entity name.

0 coins

Exactly - they use whatever sounds better or fits on the signature line, but that's not always the legal name for UCC purposes.

0 coins

Hope this works out for you! Refinancing delays over UCC technicalities are the worst. Keep us posted on whether the correction approach works.

0 coins

Will do - this thread has been super helpful. At least I know I'm not the only one dealing with these name matching headaches.

0 coins

definitely not alone - seems like every other deal has some version of this issue

0 coins

Success! Finally got my continuation filed. Used Chrome in incognito mode and it went through on first try. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!

0 coins

Glad you got it sorted. Make sure to save or print the confirmation page with the filing number.

0 coins

Great news! For your next filing, seriously consider using Certana.ai to pre-check everything. It's saved me so much stress by catching errors before submission.

0 coins

The Alabama portal updates their system every Tuesday night around 11pm-2am. Might explain the issues if they pushed an update that broke something.

0 coins

That's useful info. Do you know if they announce maintenance windows anywhere?

0 coins

Not really. I only know because I've been burned by it before when filing late at night.

0 coins

Prev1...298299300301302...684Next