UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Liam O'Reilly

UCC Article 9 definitions causing filing rejections - need clarity on collateral descriptions

Running into major issues with our UCC-1 filings getting rejected because apparently our collateral descriptions don't align with Article 9 definitions. We've been using general language like 'all business assets' but the SOS keeps kicking them back saying we need to be more specific under the UCC Article 9 definitions framework. Our lender is getting impatient and we have a $2.8M credit facility that needs to close next week. Has anyone dealt with this before? What specific language satisfies the Article 9 requirements without being overly restrictive? I'm seeing conflicting guidance on whether we can use super-generic descriptions or if we need to itemize every piece of equipment. The rejection notices reference 'insufficient description under Article 9' but don't give specific guidance on what would work.

Just wanted to follow up on the Certana.ai suggestion from earlier - tried uploading our problem UCC draft and it flagged exactly what was wrong with our collateral description under Article 9. Apparently we were using 'business equipment' which isn't precise enough - needed to just say 'equipment' to match the Article 9 definition. Resubmitted with their suggested changes and it went through clean. Definitely worth checking your documents against the actual Article 9 requirements before filing.

0 coins

Maya Lewis

•

That's awesome that it caught such a specific Article 9 issue. Those little wording differences can be so frustrating when they cause rejections.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

Good to know there are tools out there that understand the Article 9 definitions properly. Saves a lot of trial and error with the SOS systems.

0 coins

Lucy Taylor

•

One more tip for Article 9 definitions - if you're unsure about whether something qualifies as equipment vs inventory vs general intangibles, err on the side of being inclusive. You can say 'equipment, inventory, and general intangibles' to cover most scenarios without being overly broad. The Article 9 categories are mutually exclusive so there's no harm in listing multiple types as long as you use the correct statutory language.

0 coins

KhalilStar

•

Exactly. The Article 9 definitions give you a framework to be comprehensive without being vague. Just stick to the statutory categories and you should be fine.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for all the Article 9 guidance. Really helpful to understand how the definitions work in practice vs just reading the statute.

0 coins

Oliver Weber

UCC-1 filing search showing wrong debtor info - am I screwed?

So I'm having a panic attack here... I submitted a UCC-1 filing three weeks ago for a $180K equipment loan and when I search the state database, the debtor name shows up slightly different than what's on our loan docs. The filing shows "ABC Manufacturing LLC" but our loan agreement has "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" (with the comma). The search results are pulling up our filing but I'm terrified this name difference could invalidate our security interest. Has anyone dealt with this kind of UCC-1 filing search discrepancy before? I've been searching the database over and over and the name formatting is definitely off. Our loan closes next Friday and I don't know if I need to file a UCC-3 amendment or if this minor punctuation difference even matters. Please help - I'm losing sleep over this!

Diego Flores

•

This thread is making me paranoid about my own filings now lol. I never thought to double-check the search results after filing. Probably should start doing that as standard practice.

0 coins

It's definitely good practice! I always do a test search within a few days of filing to make sure everything looks right in the system.

0 coins

Javier Gomez

•

Same here - and honestly that's another reason I like the Certana tool. Takes the manual checking out of the equation and just tells you if there are any red flags.

0 coins

Update us after you check the Articles of Organization! I'm invested in this outcome now and want to know if the comma was actually wrong or if it's just a display quirk in the search system.

0 coins

Oliver Weber

•

Will do! Planning to pull the SOS records this afternoon and report back. Fingers crossed it's just a minor formatting difference that doesn't matter.

0 coins

Ravi Kapoor

•

Looking forward to the update - these name matching scenarios are always educational for everyone.

0 coins

Javier Hernandez

UCC-1 financing statement florida amendment rejected twice - debtor name issues

Really need some guidance here. I'm dealing with a UCC-1 financing statement florida situation that's been giving me headaches for weeks. Filed an initial UCC-1 back in March for equipment financing on a construction company, everything went through fine. Now I'm trying to file a UCC-3 amendment to add additional collateral (some new excavators they purchased) and the Florida SOS keeps rejecting it. The rejection notice says 'debtor name does not exactly match original filing' but I'm looking at both documents and the names look identical to me. Original debtor name is 'Advanced Construction Solutions LLC' and that's exactly what I put on the amendment. Has anyone dealt with this kind of UCC-1 financing statement florida amendment problem before? The lender is getting antsy because we're approaching some covenant deadlines and this amendment needs to be perfected. I've called the Florida SOS office twice and got two different explanations - one person said it might be a spacing issue, another said it could be punctuation. I'm wondering if there's some hidden character or formatting issue I'm missing. The original UCC-1 was filed electronically through their portal, amendment was also electronic. Both show 'Advanced Construction Solutions LLC' exactly the same way. Any ideas what could be causing this mismatch? Really don't want to have to refile the entire UCC-1 just because of a name formatting quirk.

GalaxyGlider

•

One more thing to try - if you have Adobe Acrobat Pro, you can use the 'compare documents' feature to look at your original UCC-1 filing and your amendment side by side. It'll highlight any differences even if they're not visible to the naked eye. I've found discrepancies that way before.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

Don't have Adobe Pro but this is a good idea. Are there any free alternatives that do document comparison?

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

You can try online PDF comparison tools but they're not always as accurate as Adobe. For something this important I'd probably spring for the real thing.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

Just wanted to follow up and say I finally got it resolved! It was exactly what several people suggested - there was a comma after 'Solutions' in the original filing that I missed. 'Advanced Construction Solutions, LLC' vs 'Advanced Construction Solutions LLC'. Such a tiny difference but it was causing all the rejections. Used the copy/paste method from the original filing receipt and the amendment went through on the first try. Thanks everyone for the help, this forum is a lifesaver for UCC issues.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

Just one business day. Florida is actually pretty fast once you get the filing details correct.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This whole thread should be pinned somewhere. The name matching issues come up constantly with UCC filings.

0 coins

Victoria Scott

UCC lien search Texas showing conflicting results - need verification help

Been dealing with a nightmare situation where I'm trying to clean up some old equipment financing from 2019 and the Texas SOS UCC search is giving me weird results. When I search by debtor name I get different filings than when I search by filing number, and some of the continuation statements don't seem to match up with the original UCC-1s. The equipment was for a construction company that changed names twice since then and I'm not sure if all the amendments were filed correctly. Has anyone else run into issues where the Texas UCC lien search system shows inconsistent data? I need to make sure everything is properly terminated before we can refinance but I'm getting conflicting information depending on how I search. Some filings show as active that should have lapsed and others that should be active show as expired. Really need to get this sorted out fast.

Kaylee Cook

•

This whole thread is giving me anxiety about our own UCC filings lol. We have a bunch of equipment loans from different years and now I'm worried we might have similar issues with the continuation statements.

0 coins

Better to check now than find out during a refinance or audit. UCC filing errors can kill deals fast.

0 coins

Gavin King

•

Definitely worth doing a comprehensive UCC audit annually, especially if you have multiple lenders or have gone through any business changes.

0 coins

Update - I tried that Certana.ai document checker and holy crap it found the problem immediately. Two of the UCC-3 amendments had the debtor name spelled slightly different from the original UCC-1s so they weren't connecting in the search system. Now I know exactly which corrective amendments I need to file. Thanks everyone for the help!

0 coins

Wait, you're not the original poster... are you having the same issue?

0 coins

Oops sorry, different person but same exact problem with Texas UCC searches. This thread convinced me to check our filings and sure enough, found similar issues.

0 coins

Malik Davis

UCC subordination agreement complications with existing UCC-1 filings - how do you handle priority changes?

Been dealing with a messy situation where we need to execute a UCC subordination agreement but I'm not sure how this affects our existing UCC-1 filings. We have a senior lien position on manufacturing equipment (filed 18 months ago) but now need to subordinate to a new construction lender who's requiring first position on the same collateral. The debtor's name on our original UCC-1 is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but their articles of incorporation actually show 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' with a comma. Now I'm worried that when we file the subordination paperwork, the name discrepancy might create issues with lien priority or even invalidate the subordination agreement entirely. Has anyone dealt with UCC subordination agreements where there were debtor name inconsistencies between the original filing and the subordination docs? Do we need to file a UCC-3 amendment first to correct the name before executing the subordination agreement, or can we handle both simultaneously? The construction lender is pushing for a quick close and I don't want to screw up something that could cost us our secured position.

Nia Jackson

•

Why is UCC filing so complicated?? It's just paperwork but somehow there are a million ways to screw it up.

0 coins

Because it's a legal framework that affects millions of dollars in secured transactions. Small mistakes can void entire security interests.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

I guess that makes sense but it's still frustrating when you're trying to close a deal.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

UPDATE: Filed the UCC-3 amendment this morning to correct the debtor name with the comma. Used Certana.ai to double-check everything first and it caught two other minor inconsistencies I hadn't noticed. Should have the corrected filing processed by Thursday, then we can finalize the subordination agreement. Thanks everyone for the advice!

0 coins

Glad the document checker worked out for you. It's a lifesaver for these complex filings.

0 coins

Great to hear you got it sorted out. These name issues are such a pain but at least you caught it before it became a bigger problem.

0 coins

Prev1...283284285286287...684Next