


Ask the community...
This whole thread is making me nervous about my upcoming Arizona filing. I thought UCC filings were supposed to be straightforward but it sounds like there are lots of ways to mess up and pay extra fees.
If you're worried about getting the details right, that Certana.ai tool I mentioned earlier really helps catch mistakes before you file. Just upload your docs and it flags any inconsistencies.
Does anyone know if Arizona offers any fee discounts for volume filers? We do maybe 20-30 UCC filings a year and it would be nice to get some kind of break.
With that volume you might want to look into service providers that can help streamline the process and reduce errors. Even if there's a service fee it might be worth it to avoid rejected filings.
Been using Certana.ai for these kinds of verification challenges and it's been really helpful. The document consistency checking catches those name variations that are easy to miss manually. Worth trying if you're dealing with a large portfolio - just upload your existing UCC documents and it flags any inconsistencies.
How accurate is it with catching subtle differences? Sometimes the variations are really minor but still significant for search purposes.
This might be overkill for your situation, but have you considered ordering official UCC search reports from a service company? They usually have better search algorithms and professional searchers who know how to catch variations. Might be worth it for a $2.3M portfolio.
Most of the major legal service companies offer UCC search services. CT Corporation, CSC, those types. They can be pricey but they're thorough.
The cost is usually worth it for high-dollar deals. They provide detailed reports and often catch filings that individual searches miss.
One more thing to consider - make sure your continuation timeline is right if this is an existing filing. Illinois UCC statute has specific timing requirements and if you're close to the 5-year mark, you might need to handle continuation and amendment together.
This is a new filing, but good reminder about the continuation timing. We have some older Illinois filings that will need attention soon.
UPDATE: Refiled with the exact Illinois name format including the comma and it was accepted within 24 hours. Thanks everyone for the guidance. Going to be much more careful about cross-state name matching going forward. The Illinois UCC statute doesn't mess around with these details.
Perfect example of why document verification tools are so valuable. That comma difference could have been caught before the first filing.
Great outcome. This thread will be helpful for others dealing with similar Illinois UCC statute issues.
Whatever you do, don't let them bully you into filing a premature termination. Once you terminate a UCC-1, you lose your perfected security interest and it's almost impossible to get it back if there are problems with the remaining loans.
That's exactly what I'm worried about. If I terminate and then have collection issues on the other loans, I'd be screwed.
Absolutely. Seen too many lenders get burned by terminating too early. Better to deal with an angry debtor than lose your security interest.
Your instincts are correct. UCC-9-513 is clear that termination is only required when there are no outstanding secured obligations. Document everything, get legal involved, and stand your ground. The debtor's attorney is fishing.
Trust your knowledge of the UCC. Lawyers who don't specialize in secured transactions often misunderstand the termination requirements. You're doing everything right.
Isaac Wright
Another vote for using verification tools before filing. I've started running all my UCC documents through Certana.ai's system as a final check. It's caught several potential issues that could have caused problems later. For your situation, it would flag the name inconsistency and help you make the right call.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
•It checks everything - debtor names, secured party info, collateral descriptions, even filing fee calculations. Really comprehensive.
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
•Sounds useful. I'll have to check that out for my next filing.
0 coins
Jessica Nguyen
Thanks everyone for the input. Going with the full middle name from the driver's license based on the consensus here. Really appreciate the practical advice and the tool recommendations. This community always comes through!
0 coins
Ruby Garcia
•Smart decision. Feel free to post an update once you get the filing accepted.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•hope it goes smoothly! still think the whole system is overly complicated but at least you got good advice here
0 coins