Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Chloe Zhang
As someone who handles a lot of equipment financing deals, I can confirm that the dual citation approach is definitely the way to go. I've been using "UCC 1-308 (formerly 1-207)" in all my reservation clauses for the past few years and it eliminates any confusion. One additional tip - make sure your reservation language is drafted narrowly to the specific constitutional concerns your debtor has raised. I've seen cases where overly broad reservations actually weakened the debtor's position because courts viewed them as trying to have their cake and eat it too. Since you mentioned due process concerns specifically, focus the reservation on procedural rights rather than trying to reserve substantive contract terms. The equipment financing context makes this easier since the collateral is clearly defined and the debtor's performance obligations are straightforward.
Jamal Harris
•This is exactly the kind of practical guidance I was looking for! The point about narrowly drafting the reservation to focus on procedural due process rights rather than substantive contract terms is really helpful. Since the debtor's concerns are specifically about constitutional due process, I can craft language that preserves their right to challenge procedural aspects while still honoring the core security agreement. Your point about overly broad reservations backfiring makes a lot of sense - courts probably see vague "all rights reserved" language as bad faith attempts to avoid contractual obligations. I'll make sure to tie the reservation directly to the specific due process concerns they've raised.
Ruby Garcia
This thread has been incredibly educational! As someone relatively new to UCC filings, I had no idea about the 1-207 to 1-308 renumbering in 2001. The dual citation approach everyone's recommending makes perfect sense from a risk management perspective. One question I have - when you're working with debtors who want to include reservation language, do you typically explain the limitations of UCC 1-308? It sounds like some people misunderstand it as a way to escape all obligations rather than just preserving specific rights while still performing under the contract. I imagine setting proper expectations upfront could prevent issues down the road, especially in equipment financing where the collateral and payment terms are usually pretty clear-cut.
Liv Park
•Absolutely - I always explain the limitations upfront! I tell debtors that UCC 1-308 isn't a "get out of jail free" card, but rather a way to perform under the contract while preserving specific legal rights for future challenge. I usually give them an example: they can sign the security agreement and make payments as required, while reserving the right to challenge a particular procedure or term in court later. This prevents them from thinking they can just ignore their obligations. In equipment financing, it's especially important to clarify that the security interest in the equipment remains valid and enforceable regardless of any reservation language. Most debtors appreciate the honest explanation, and it actually builds trust when they realize you're helping them understand both their rights and their limitations.
Join the conversation
Perfect thread for understanding UCC abbreviation meaning. I bookmarked this because I know I'll need to refer back to these explanations. The Uniform Commercial Code really is the backbone of commercial financing law.
Same here. It's nice to finally have a clear explanation of what UCC abbreviation meaning actually covers.
Agreed. This should be required reading for anyone new to commercial lending.
Sofia Gomez
As someone who's relatively new to commercial lending, this thread has been incredibly helpful! I've been struggling with understanding all the UCC references in our loan documents, and now I finally get that UCC abbreviation meaning is Uniform Commercial Code - the actual law that governs everything we do. It makes so much more sense now why our attorneys are always talking about "UCC compliance" and why we need to be so careful with our filings. I feel like I can actually have intelligent conversations about this stuff now instead of just nodding along when people mention UCC requirements.
Welcome to the community! I totally understand that feeling of finally having the lightbulb moment about UCC. When I first started in lending, I was so intimidated by all the legal terminology, but once you grasp that the Uniform Commercial Code is just the framework that makes all our secured transactions possible, everything else starts clicking into place. Don't worry about feeling behind - we've all been there with UCC concepts!
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Thanks everyone for the advice. I contacted our bank this morning and they confirmed that the sale proceeds will fully satisfy the remaining debt balance. They're preparing a UCC-3 termination statement for us to review and file once the proceeds are officially applied to the loan. Should be resolved within the next week.
Diego Flores
•This thread was super helpful for understanding the proceeds perfection rules. I had no idea about the 20-day automatic period or the importance of having 'proceeds' in the original collateral description.
Definitely learned a lot here too. Going to double-check our UCC-1 filings to make sure the collateral descriptions are comprehensive enough to cover proceeds from any future sales.
Mateo Perez
This is a great example of why communication with your lender is so critical in UCC Article 9 sales. I've seen too many situations where businesses try to handle the filing requirements on their own and end up creating problems. The fact that your bank is asking for a termination actually suggests they're being proactive about cleaning up the filing once the transaction is complete. Just make sure you get written confirmation that the proceeds will fully satisfy the debt before filing anything - and keep copies of all the paperwork for your records. The $95K sale proceeds against a $180K original loan suggests there might be other collateral or payments involved, so definitely verify the final payoff amount includes all interest and fees.
This is excellent advice about getting written confirmation on the final payoff amount. I'm new to UCC filings and didn't realize how many variables could affect the final debt calculation - interest, fees, escrow holds, etc. The gap between the $180K original loan and $95K sale proceeds definitely suggests there might be additional payments or other collateral involved. Better to ask too many questions upfront than deal with complications later!
Join the conversation
Andre Moreau
Pro tip for anyone doing SBA loans: ask your bank if they have a dedicated SBA UCC specialist. The good SBA lenders usually have someone who only handles the secured transaction paperwork for SBA deals. Makes the whole process much smoother.
NeonNebula
•Great suggestion. I'm going to ask about that when we meet with them tomorrow.
This is excellent advice. The SBA specialists know all the quirks and requirements that trip up regular commercial lenders.
Mia Green
Just went through this exact situation 6 months ago with our SBA 7(a) loan. The key thing that saved us was demanding to see the actual UCC-1 draft before they filed it. Our bank kept saying "we'll handle everything" but when I finally saw their draft, the collateral description was completely wrong - they had generic language like "all equipment" instead of the specific item-by-item breakdown SBA requires. Once we caught that, we provided a detailed equipment schedule with serial numbers, model numbers, and purchase dates for everything over $1,000. The filing went through clean after that. Don't let them rush the UCC filing - better to delay a few days and get it right than deal with rejections and amendments later.
This is exactly the kind of proactive approach I wish I'd taken from the start. The "we'll handle everything" line from banks sounds reassuring but clearly isn't always reliable for SBA UCCs. Did you have any pushback from the bank when you asked to review the draft filing beforehand?
CyberNinja
•Actually had quite a bit of pushback initially - they acted like I was questioning their expertise. But when I explained that I'd heard about SBA UCC rejections causing major closing delays, they became more cooperative. I think the key was framing it as "wanting to avoid any potential issues" rather than "I don't trust you." Once they saw I was serious about the timeline, they were willing to show me the draft. Definitely worth standing firm on this - it's your deal and your closing at risk.
Mateusius Townsend
Adding to this excellent discussion - one thing I'd strongly recommend is documenting your entire assignment process for future reference and potential audits. Create a transaction file that includes copies of all original UCC-1 filings, the certified SOS searches, signed UCC-3 assignment forms, filing receipts, and any correspondence with the assignor. This becomes especially important if you're dealing with multiple assignments like your three equipment filings. I also suggest sending a courtesy notice to the debtor about the assignment, even though it's not legally required in most states. This can help avoid confusion if they need to contact the secured party for releases or other matters down the road. Finally, don't forget to update your internal loan servicing systems and any third-party servicing agreements to reflect the new secured party status. The legal assignment is just one piece - making sure your operational systems are aligned prevents headaches later when you need to enforce your security interest or process releases.
0 coins
Lucas Lindsey
•This is such valuable advice about documentation and operational considerations! As someone new to this process, I hadn't thought about the internal systems updates or courtesy notices to debtors. The documentation file approach makes perfect sense - especially with three separate assignments, having everything organized in one place will be crucial if questions arise later. I'm curious about the courtesy notice to debtors - do you typically send this after the UCC-3 assignments are filed and processed, or before? And is there any standard language you'd recommend for that type of notice? I want to make sure I'm being professional and clear without creating any unnecessary confusion about their obligations or payment instructions.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
As a newcomer to UCC assignments, this discussion has been incredibly educational! I'm currently working on my first assignment transaction and wanted to add a question about post-filing verification. After you submit the UCC-3 assignments, what's the best practice for confirming they were processed correctly? Should I be requesting certified copies of the filed assignments from the Secretary of State, or is checking the online UCC search database sufficient? I've heard horror stories about filings that appeared to go through but had processing errors that weren't discovered until much later. Also, for those who mentioned using Certana.ai for document verification - how does that tool work exactly? Does it just check for formatting issues, or does it also validate against state-specific requirements? Given that I'm dealing with a significant equipment financing transaction, I want to make sure I have proper verification procedures in place before considering the assignment process complete.
0 coins