UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Lara Woods

New Mexico UCC search showing expired continuation - filing still valid?

I'm running into a confusing situation with a UCC search in New Mexico and hoping someone can help clarify. We have a UCC-1 that was filed about 6 years ago, and I just ran a New Mexico UCC search to verify our lien position before a loan modification. The search results show our original filing, but there's also a continuation statement that appears to have expired last month. Here's what's weird - our internal records show we filed the continuation 8 months ago, well before the 5-year deadline. The SOS portal shows it as 'expired' but I can't figure out if this means our entire security interest has lapsed or if there's just a status display error. The debtor is asking us to provide proof that our lien is still perfected, and frankly I'm not sure what to tell them. Has anyone dealt with New Mexico's UCC search system showing continuation filings as expired when they should still be active? This is for a significant equipment financing deal and I really need to get this sorted out quickly.

Arjun Patel

•

For what it's worth, I've never seen a properly filed continuation actually invalidate a security interest due to portal display issues. The legal effectiveness is based on the actual filing, not the online status. But definitely get it resolved for documentation purposes.

0 coins

Lara Woods

•

Thanks, that's helpful context. I think I'll verify the documents are consistent first, then contact the SOS office if needed.

0 coins

Jade Lopez

•

Smart approach. Document verification first, then escalate to the state if there's actually a filing problem.

0 coins

Tony Brooks

•

Keep us posted on what you find out! This kind of search system issue seems to be popping up more frequently across different states. Would be helpful to know how NM resolves it.

0 coins

Lara Woods

•

Will do. Hopefully it's just a system glitch that gets sorted out soon.

0 coins

Yeah, please update the thread. I file in NM occasionally and this is good to know about.

0 coins

Ayla Kumar

CT UCC lookup showing weird results - need help understanding what I'm seeing

I'm trying to do a CT UCC lookup on some collateral we financed last year and the results are confusing me. When I search by debtor name I get multiple filings that seem related but have different filing numbers. Some show as 'Active' others show 'Lapsed' but the dates don't make sense to me. One UCC-1 shows filed in March 2024 but there's also a UCC-3 continuation from January 2025 with a completely different filing number. How do I know which one is actually securing our loan? The debtor company changed their name slightly in 2024 (added LLC to the end) so maybe that's causing issues? I need to make sure our lien position is still valid before we process a big equipment addition to the same borrower.

Dyllan Nantx

•

This thread is helpful! I have a Connecticut continuation coming due next month and was worried about timing requirements.

0 coins

Make sure you file within the 6-month window before expiration. Connecticut is pretty strict about timing.

0 coins

Anna Xian

•

Set a calendar reminder for 7 months before expiration to give yourself buffer time.

0 coins

Sounds like your lien is fine - just amended for the name change. I'd still recommend getting copies of both the original UCC-1 and the amendment for your files to document the complete chain.

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

Smart move. Having documentation of the complete filing history is always good practice.

0 coins

Glad we could help sort this out. CT UCC searches can definitely be confusing with name changes.

0 coins

Dana Doyle

Statutory UCC Requirements - Missing Critical Documentation After Equipment Seizure

Equipment finance company just seized our machinery claiming we violated statutory UCC requirements but I'm questioning their authority here. They filed a UCC-1 back in 2019 for our packaging equipment (valued around $180K) but now they're saying we failed to meet some statutory UCC obligation that voided our payment agreement. The seizure notice references 'non-compliance with statutory UCC perfection requirements' but doesn't specify what we supposedly missed. We've been current on payments and maintained insurance as required. Has anyone dealt with a lender claiming statutory UCC violations as grounds for immediate seizure? I'm trying to figure out if this is legitimate or if they're overreaching their security interest. The original UCC filing shows them as secured party but I don't see how we violated any statutory requirements when we've been compliant with the loan terms.

Philip Cowan

•

Just want to say thanks for posting this because I never realized how important exact name matching was for UCC filings. Going to double-check all our equipment loans now.

0 coins

Kara Yoshida

•

Smart move. Debtor name errors are one of the most common ways UCC filings become legally insufficient.

0 coins

Caesar Grant

•

Update us on what happens! If you're right about the name mismatch this could be a huge win. Document everything and consider filing a wrongful seizure claim if their UCC-1 is actually defective.

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

Good luck! Sounds like you have a strong case if the name issue is as clear as it seems.

0 coins

Cynthia Love

•

Hope you nail them for this intimidation tactic. Lenders who play fast and loose with statutory UCC requirements need to be held accountable.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

Need Help Understanding What is a UCC Search in Real Estate Transactions

I'm in the middle of purchasing a commercial property and my attorney mentioned we need to do a UCC search as part of due diligence. I'm confused about what this means exactly. The property has some equipment and fixtures that will transfer with the sale, and apparently there might be financing liens against these items? Can someone explain what is a UCC search in real estate and why it matters for my purchase? I don't want to inherit someone else's debt problems. The seller claims everything is clear but I'm not sure how to verify this myself.

Quick question - if the UCC search shows active filings, does that automatically kill the deal? Or are there ways to work around existing security interests?

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

•

Not necessarily a deal killer. You can negotiate with the seller to pay off the secured debt, get a release from the lender, or adjust the purchase price. The key is knowing about it before closing so you can address it properly.

0 coins

Sofia Morales

•

Sometimes the equipment subject to UCC liens isn't even essential to your intended use of the property. You might negotiate to exclude those items from the sale entirely.

0 coins

I just went through this process last month for a warehouse purchase. Found three UCC-1 filings against forklifts and racking systems. Two had been terminated properly with UCC-3 filings, but one was still active. Seller had to provide a satisfaction letter from the lender before we could close. Definitely worth the extra week of due diligence to avoid future headaches.

0 coins

How long did it take the seller to get the satisfaction letter? I'm worried about delays affecting my closing timeline.

0 coins

About 10 business days. The lender was pretty responsive once they confirmed the debt had been paid off. Just make sure to request termination documents well before your closing date.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

UCC search Tennessee showing weird gaps in filing history - missing continuations?

Running into something strange with a UCC search Tennessee I'm doing for due diligence on a equipment purchase. The debtor shows multiple UCC-1 filings from 2019-2020 but then there's this weird gap where I'd expect to see continuations filed around 2024. The original filings should have lapsed by now if they weren't continued, but the search results are showing some kind of inconsistent status. Has anyone dealt with Tennessee SOS database showing incomplete continuation records? I'm trying to figure out if these liens are actually still active or if they properly lapsed. The equipment dealer is saying everything's clear but I want to make sure before we finalize this $180k purchase. The search shows the original UCC-1s but I can't tell if the required continuations were actually filed or if there's just a database display issue.

Connor Murphy

•

For what it's worth, I've had good luck with Certana.ai for exactly this type of verification issue. Upload your search results and original documents and it will flag any missing pieces in the filing chain. Really helpful for catching name variations or missed continuations that could cause problems down the road.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

I was skeptical about automated tools for UCC verification but honestly they're getting pretty sophisticated. Especially for catching the little details that human reviewers might miss.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

At this point I'm willing to try anything that can give me confidence in these search results. The stakes are too high to guess wrong.

0 coins

StarGazer101

•

One more thing to check - make sure you're searching the correct time period. Tennessee's online system sometimes defaults to showing only recent filings. You might need to expand your search date range to capture all the relevant continuation statements.

0 coins

StarGazer101

•

Yeah, for a complete picture you want to search back at least 6-7 years to catch any original filings and their continuation history.

0 coins

Also make sure you're including both 'filed' and 'recorded' documents in your search parameters. Some continuations get categorized differently in their system.

0 coins

Prev1...265266267268269...684Next