Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Bottom line - start the UCC filing process now, get your equipment appraised to determine fixture status, and make sure all documents use consistent debtor names and collateral descriptions. Your mortgage closing will go much smoother with everything in order upfront.
Thanks everyone for the advice. Sounds like I have a clear action plan now.
Good luck with the refi. These commercial deals can be complex but you seem to be on the right track.
As a newcomer here, I'm finding this thread incredibly helpful! I'm actually facing a similar situation with my café equipment during an upcoming refi. One question I haven't seen addressed - do you need to notify your current lender before starting the new UCC-1 filing process? I'm worried about creating conflicts between the old and new filings during the transition period. Also, has anyone dealt with this when some equipment was purchased through vendor financing but cross-collateralized with the mortgage? Trying to understand if those vendor liens complicate the UCC situation even more.
Join the conversation
Just went through this on an office building purchase. The fixture filing covered elevator equipment and the secured party wanted $15K to release it even though the debt was only $8K. Sometimes these turn into negotiation leverage for the secured parties.
Negotiated down to $10K and made the seller cover it. But it delayed closing by two weeks while we fought about it.
This is why fixture filings are so problematic. They give secured parties too much leverage in real estate transactions.
This is a classic fixture filing headache. I'm dealing with something similar on a manufacturing facility purchase - the UCC-1 covers "all machinery and equipment" which is way too broad. My advice: get a detailed breakdown of what specific equipment is actually covered before you start negotiating the termination. Sometimes the collateral description is so vague that half the stuff isn't even legally perfected as fixtures. Also, check if the original debt has been satisfied - I've seen cases where the loan was paid off years ago but nobody bothered to file the UCC-3. Your title company is absolutely right to flag this, and your lender won't budge until it's cleared.
This is really helpful - the "all machinery and equipment" description sounds exactly like what we're dealing with. How do you go about getting that detailed breakdown? Do you request it from the secured party directly or is there another way to parse what's actually covered under such broad language?
Join the conversation
One more thing - keep copies of both documents in a safe place. If you ever need to prove the terms of your loan or if there's a dispute about the collateral, you'll need that security agreement. And if you pay off the loan early, make sure the lender files a UCC-3 termination to clear the public record.
Yeah, I've seen situations where old UCC filings weren't terminated and it caused problems with new financing years later.
That's another thing Certana can help with - you can upload your payoff documents and the UCC-3 termination to make sure everything got cleared properly.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone new to equipment financing, I was getting overwhelmed by all the legal terminology. Just to make sure I understand correctly: the security agreement is like the main contract that spells out all the terms between me and the lender, and the UCC-1 is basically a public filing that tells the world "hey, this lender has dibs on this equipment." The lender usually handles filing the UCC-1, but I should definitely review it before they submit it to catch any errors with names or equipment descriptions. And I should keep copies of everything for my records. Does that sound right?
Exactly right! You've got the key concepts down perfectly. The security agreement is your main contract with all the detailed terms, and the UCC-1 is just the public notice part. Definitely smart to review that UCC-1 before filing - those name and description errors people mentioned can be a real headache later. One small addition: also make sure you understand what happens at the end of the loan (like getting that UCC-3 termination filed) so there are no lingering issues on your business records.
Join the conversation
One more thing to consider - if you have a master lease with multiple equipment schedules, make sure your UCC filing covers future equipment additions under the same lease. Otherwise you might need to file amendments every time you lease additional equipment.
Language like 'all present and future leasehold interests under Master Lease Agreement with ABC Equipment Leasing' should cover additions. But verify with your lawyer.
We tried that approach but our bank wanted specific equipment serial numbers listed. Every bank seems to have different requirements for lease collateral descriptions.
Based on my experience with similar situations, you're on the right track filing under your company name as debtor. The bank is securing your leasehold interest, not the equipment itself. A few critical points to double-check: (1) verify your lease agreement specifically permits granting security interests in leasehold rights - this is often buried in the fine print, (2) consider using collateral description language like "all of Debtor's right, title and interest in equipment subject to Master Lease Agreement with ABC Equipment Leasing dated [date], including all present and future equipment schedules thereunder" to cover both existing and future equipment additions, and (3) make sure your bank's loan documentation is clear that they're taking a security interest in lease rights rather than equipment ownership to avoid confusion down the road. The $2.8M value suggests this is substantial collateral, so getting the filing details right is crucial for your credit facility.
Connor Murphy
As someone new to both this community and UCC filings in general, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm working on my first solar equipment financing deal and realized I have so much to learn. Based on everything discussed here, it sounds like the key issues with Chloe's situation could be: 1) Name discrepancies between the original UCC-1 and termination (especially if the company changed names), 2) Potential missing fixture filing requirements for permanently attached panels in California, and 3) The notoriously slow California SOS database updates. @57bfe6bafdb9 I'd definitely follow up on getting that confirmation number from the credit union and maybe run both documents through one of those verification tools people mentioned. Also worth checking with the county recorder's office to see if there should have been a fixture filing that also needs termination. This discussion is making me realize I need to build a comprehensive checklist for solar equipment UCC filings to avoid these kinds of complications from the start. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical knowledge that's so valuable for newcomers!
0 coins
Amina Sow
•@08b9afb06a50 You've done a great job summarizing the key issues from this thread! As another newcomer, I'm also realizing how complex solar equipment UCC filings can be. Your checklist idea is brilliant - I'm thinking of creating something similar. One thing I'm wondering about after reading all this: should we always assume solar panels need fixture filings in addition to standard UCC-1s, or are there specific criteria that determine when they're considered personal property vs fixtures? It seems like the "permanently attached" aspect is key, but I'd love to understand the legal test better. Also, @57bfe6bafdb9 hoping you get that confirmation number soon and can update us on what you find! This whole discussion has me worried about a solar deal I'm working on - definitely going to verify everything twice now.
0 coins
Malik Davis
As a newcomer to this community, I'm amazed by how much I've learned from this thread! I had no idea solar equipment UCC filings were so complex. The issues everyone's discussing - name matching problems, fixture vs personal property distinctions, California's slow database updates - are all things I never would have considered. I'm just getting started with UCC work and this is exactly the kind of real-world knowledge that's invaluable. Quick question for the group: for someone new to solar financing, would you recommend always consulting with local counsel on the fixture filing question, or are there clear guidelines we can follow? It seems like the permanently attached vs removable distinction is crucial but maybe not always obvious. Also wondering if there are any other industries (besides renewable energy) where this personal property vs fixture issue comes up frequently? Thanks to everyone for sharing your experiences - this thread should be required reading for anyone doing solar equipment financing!
0 coins