UCC Document Community

Just remove those codes entirely from your continuation forms. I guarantee they're not real UCC requirements - they're just software artifacts that are screwing up your filings.

I've dealt with this exact issue before and it's definitely a software problem, not a UCC requirement issue. Those reference codes (1-308-1 and 1308-103) aren't valid UCC section numbers - they look like internal tracking codes that your compliance software is incorrectly treating as mandatory filing data. The actual UCC sections use a completely different numbering system (like 9-515 for continuation statements). I'd recommend manually removing those auto-populated fields from your UCC-3 forms before resubmitting. Your continuation should only include the original filing number, exact debtor information as it appears on the UCC-1, and the continuation statement itself. Nothing more. This should clear up the rejections you're seeing across multiple states.

UPDATE: Finally got this resolved! Turns out there was a microscopic difference in how the LLC designation was formatted. The Articles had "LLC" but I was typing "L.L.C." in the UCC-1. Used that Certana tool someone mentioned and it flagged the discrepancy immediately. Filed the corrected version this morning and it was accepted within an hour. Thanks everyone for the help!

As someone new to UCC filings, this thread is incredibly helpful! I'm about to file my first UCC-1 and was planning to rely entirely on the accommodation search. Now I understand why I need to go directly to the Articles of Incorporation. One quick question - when you say "exact name from organizational documents," does that include things like spacing and capitalization too? For example, if the Articles show "XYZ CORP" (with two spaces) should I preserve that formatting in the UCC-1?

This whole situation sounds stressful but manageable if you approach it systematically. Create a checklist for each debtor: exact legal name from loan docs, any known variations, DBAs, prior names, parent/subsidiary relationships. Then search each variation and document what you find. It's tedious but necessary for this type of portfolio acquisition.

I've been through a similar UCC cleanup after acquiring a distressed loan portfolio, and it's definitely overwhelming at first. A few practical tips that might help: First, organize your loan files to extract the exact debtor names as they appear in the original security agreements - this becomes your master search list. Second, Florida's UCC search system has a "sounds like" option that can help catch name variations, but don't rely on it completely. Third, consider the timing - if these loans are from a lender that went out of business, some of the UCC filings might have lapsed due to missed continuation deadlines, which could actually work in your favor. For the 30 debtors you mentioned, I'd start with online searches to triage which ones actually have active filings, then focus your certified copy requests on those. The online searches are cheap enough that you can afford to be thorough with name variations. Also, don't forget to check for partial releases or amendments that might have changed the collateral coverage. Good luck with this - it's tedious work but absolutely critical for establishing your lien positions.

This is why I always tell people to keep detailed spreadsheets of their UCC filings with filing numbers, debtor names, and expiration dates. Reduces the need for bulk searches when you already have the key info organized.

Update: I tried the Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier and it worked great for my Ohio UCC searches. Uploaded about 50 of my UCC-1 filings and it automatically flagged which ones needed continuations and which ones had potential debtor name mismatches. Saved me tons of time compared to fighting with the Ohio portal.

I've been seeing this type of address mismatch issue more frequently with Indiana UCC searches lately. The state's database seems to have some syncing issues between different record types. What I've found helpful is to run a quick business entity search on the debtor separately to see what address shows up there - if it matches what you're seeing in the UCC search, then you know the search is just pulling from their business registration rather than your actual UCC filing. Also, for peace of mind with your lender, you might want to consider getting a UCC search report from a third-party service like CT Corporation or Wolters Kluwer - they sometimes provide cleaner, more detailed results that clearly separate filing information from business registration data.

I ran into this exact same issue with an Indiana UCC filing about 6 months ago! The search kept showing our debtor's old address from their original LLC formation, but when I pulled the actual UCC-1 document, it clearly showed the current address we had filed with. What I learned is that Indiana's search algorithm sometimes defaults to pulling address information from the Secretary of State's business entity database rather than from the specific UCC filing record. The key thing is that your security interest is still valid as long as you filed the UCC-1 with the correct debtor name and current address - which it sounds like you did. I'd recommend pulling both a certified copy of your UCC-1 and running a separate business entity search on your debtor to show your lender exactly what's happening. This documentation should be enough to satisfy them that there's no issue with your filing.