


Ask the community...
Have you tried using one of those UCC document checking services? I heard Certana.ai can verify if your collateral descriptions meet the official comment standards. Might be worth checking before you decide whether to amend or defend your current filing.
A few people have mentioned that service. Sounds like it might help me understand if our description is actually problematic or if we can defend it as-is.
I've been through fixture filing disputes before and the key is understanding that the UCC official comments provide flexibility for "reasonably identifies" - it's not always about being super specific. In your case, "restaurant equipment affixed to real property" at a specific restaurant location might actually be sufficient under the official comments, especially if there's no real ambiguity about what equipment you're claiming. The mixed-use building factor does complicate things though. I'd suggest getting a proper analysis of your filing against the UCC standards before deciding whether to amend or fight the challenge - sometimes these disputes are more about intimidation tactics than actual legal deficiencies in your collateral description.
This whole situation is why I hate secured lending. You think you're protected but then debtors just refuse to cooperate and you're stuck in court for months. Meanwhile your collateral is sitting there losing value every day.
That's the nature of the business unfortunately. The alternative is unsecured lending with even worse recovery rates. At least with a UCC filing you have some rights.
I've dealt with this situation multiple times. Here's my practical advice: First, send a final demand letter specifically requesting access to the collateral within 10 business days, referencing both your security agreement and UCC-1 filing. If they still refuse, file for a replevin action rather than full foreclosure - it's faster and specifically designed to get possession of personal property. Most judges will grant it quickly if your paperwork is in order. Also consider getting an updated appraisal of the equipment before you proceed - printing equipment can depreciate faster than you think, and you want to know if the numbers still make sense. The whole process took us about 6 weeks from filing to sale, which beat the 3+ months of full judicial foreclosure. Document every interaction and keep all certified mail receipts. Don't attempt self-help if they're actively refusing - the breach of peace risk isn't worth it.
Whatever you do, don't let your refinancing get held up by this. Even if there is a legitimate issue with the equipment financing, most title companies will accept an indemnity agreement from the seller while you sort out the details.
I'd strongly recommend getting a copy of the original UCC-1 filing from Industrial Equipment Finance LLC and comparing it line-by-line with your equipment purchase documentation. Pay special attention to the filing date, debtor information, and collateral description. If this lien predates your equipment purchase and describes equipment by location rather than specific serial numbers, you might be dealing with a blanket lien that covered the previous tenant's equipment. Also check if Industrial Equipment Finance has any corporate relationships with your original lender - sometimes parent companies or affiliates file duplicate liens during transitions. Document everything carefully because if this turns out to be an error, you'll want a clear paper trail for the title company.
Thanks everyone for the detailed responses. Sounds like fixture filing is definitely the way to go for this type of equipment. I'll coordinate with the borrower's real estate attorney to get the proper legal description and file in both locations. Better safe than sorry with this much money at stake.
One additional consideration for Texas fixture filings - make sure you're clear on the county's recording requirements. Some Texas counties require the fixture filing to be recorded in the Real Property Records rather than just the UCC records section. Also, if your borrower's warehouse spans multiple counties (which happens with large facilities), you'll need to file fixture filings in each county where the real estate is located. I've seen deals where people missed this and only filed in the county where the business address was located, not realizing the property crossed county lines. Always verify the exact property boundaries before filing.
Mason Stone
Thanks everyone for all the great advice on UCC opp search strategies! This thread has given me a lot of new ideas to try, especially the timing approaches around continuations and assignments. Going to implement some automated verification tools too - sounds like that could really help with the volume and accuracy issues we're having.
0 coins
Makayla Shoemaker
•Glad this was helpful! UCC opp search is definitely more art than science, but having good systems makes all the difference.
0 coins
Christian Bierman
•Let us know how the automated verification works out for you. Always interested to hear about new tools that can help with UCC prospecting.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
As someone new to UCC opp search, this thread is incredibly valuable! I'm working at a small commercial lending firm and we've been struggling with the same manual search issues. The pattern recognition approach mentioned by Avery really resonates - we've been looking at individual filings in isolation instead of tracking company behavior over time. The timing strategies around continuations and weekend filings are brilliant insights I never would have considered. Question for the group: when you're starting out with limited resources, what would you prioritize first - automated alerts for new filings, or document verification tools for better analysis of existing data? Also curious about geographic targeting - are there specific states where UCC filings tend to be more reliable indicators of financing opportunities, or is it pretty consistent across jurisdictions?
0 coins