UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

The scope of article 9 ucc really comes down to whether you're creating a security interest in personal property to secure an obligation. If your 'lease' is really just a way to finance the debtor's acquisition of equipment, it falls under Article 9 regardless of what you call it. Focus on the economic substance, not the legal labels.

0 coins

Thanks everyone - this has been really helpful. Sounds like the consensus is to err on the side of filing UCCs for anything that's even close to the line.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

That's definitely the safer approach. Article 9 scope is broad for a reason - it's designed to catch most commercial financing arrangements under one unified system.

0 coins

Miguel Castro

•

This is a great discussion that highlights how nuanced Article 9 scope determinations can be. One practical tip I'd add - consider creating a decision tree or flowchart for your team that walks through the key factors: lease term vs. useful life, purchase options, residual value expectations, etc. We implemented something similar and it's helped standardize our approach across different deal types. Also, document your reasoning for each decision - auditors and examiners love to see that you have a consistent methodology for scope determinations, even if they might disagree with specific conclusions.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

The decision tree approach is brilliant! We've been struggling with consistency across our team, especially when different analysts are reviewing similar deal structures. Having a standardized flowchart would really help ensure we're applying the Article 9 scope tests uniformly. Do you have any recommendations for what the key decision points should be in that flowchart? I'm thinking something like: (1) Is there a purchase option? (2) If yes, is it nominal? (3) Does lease term exceed X% of useful life? But I'd love to hear what criteria have worked best for others in practice.

0 coins

Just to wrap this up - forget about finding a 'UCC 11 form Louisiana' specifically. Use Louisiana's standard Information Request form, get the debtor name exactly right, consider certified searches for important transactions, and verify all your documents match up properly. Should cover all your bases for the equipment financing.

0 coins

This thread was really helpful. I was making the same mistake about looking for specific form numbers instead of focusing on the actual search process.

0 coins

Emma Morales

•

Always good to see these detailed discussions about state-specific UCC procedures. Each state really does have their own quirks.

0 coins

Leslie Parker

•

As someone new to UCC searches, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm dealing with a similar situation in another state and was also getting confused by different form numbering systems. The advice about focusing on getting the debtor name exactly right and considering certified searches for important transactions really resonates. I appreciate how everyone broke down the Louisiana-specific process while also explaining the broader principles that apply across states. This kind of detailed, practical guidance is exactly what newcomers like me need when navigating UCC procedures for the first time.

0 coins

Final thought - don't forget to document your search methodology for the deal file. Note which states you searched, what name variations you used, and the dates of your searches. If issues come up later, you'll want to show you did comprehensive due diligence.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Yes, and consider having the target company represent and warrant that they've disclosed all security interests. Gives you some protection if something was missed.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

Also useful to have them provide their own list of known liens so you can compare against what you find independently.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful - thank you all for the detailed guidance! I'm starting to realize how complex this really is. One more question: when you're dealing with equipment financing, how do you distinguish between UCC filings that might be for operating leases versus actual secured debt? I want to make sure I'm not flagging every piece of leased equipment as a potential deal issue if it's just normal business operations.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

This thread is really helpful. I have a similar deal coming up next week and was dreading figuring out the UCC filing requirements. Sounds like individual as debtor, file in LLC's formation state, and be comprehensive with the collateral description.

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

Yeah, that seems to be the consensus. Glad this discussion helped both of us figure it out.

0 coins

Always good to see these concepts click for people. LLC interest as collateral trips up a lot of folks initially.

0 coins

Camila Jordan

•

This is such a valuable discussion! I'm new to handling secured transactions and this LLC membership interest collateral scenario seems really complex. One thing I'm wondering about - when you file the UCC-1 against the individual member in the LLC's state of organization, do you also need to worry about where the individual debtor is located for any additional filings? Or does filing in Delaware (where the LLC was formed) cover everything? Also, for a $350K deal like this, are there any additional due diligence steps beyond just getting the UCC filing right? Thanks for all the insights everyone has shared here.

0 coins

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with something similar and want to know what approach works best.

0 coins

Quinn Herbert

•

Will do. I'm going to call them tomorrow with specific questions about filing timeline and reference number. If that doesn't work I'll try the written demand approach.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

Good plan. Document everything - dates, who you spoke with, what they promised. Makes it easier to escalate if needed.

0 coins

As someone new to this whole UCC process, reading through all these responses really helps clarify what UCC termination meaning actually is. It sounds like the key takeaway is that termination (via UCC-3 filing) is legally required after loan payoff, while lapse is just what happens after 5 years if nothing is done. Quinn, I'd definitely recommend the written demand approach that Aliyah mentioned - seems like phone calls aren't getting you anywhere after 6 weeks. Also interesting to see multiple people mention using Certana.ai to verify their documents match up correctly. Might be worth checking your original UCC-1 filing to make sure there aren't any name discrepancies that could be causing delays or issues with your new lender.

0 coins

Avery Saint

•

Sophie, you've summarized this really well! As someone also new to UCC filings, I was getting confused by all the different terms too. The distinction between termination and lapse is super important - I had no idea there was a difference. Your point about checking for name discrepancies is spot on. It seems like a lot of these delays and issues come from simple clerical errors that could have been caught early with proper document verification. Thanks for breaking it down so clearly for us newcomers!

0 coins

Prev1...182183184185186...684Next