

Ask the community...
I went through this exact situation two years ago at 63 after my third heart attack. The dual approach is definitely the right strategy - I filed for early retirement first to get immediate income, then applied for SSDI about a month later. A few things that really helped my case: 1. I kept a daily symptoms diary for about 6 weeks before applying - noting chest pain episodes, fatigue levels, how far I could walk without getting winded, etc. The SSDI examiner specifically mentioned this helped them understand my functional limitations. 2. My cardiologist filled out a detailed RFC (Residual Functional Capacity) form that SSA provides. This was crucial - it spelled out exactly what I couldn't do (lift over 10 lbs, work in high-stress environments, stand for more than 20 minutes at a time). 3. I was approved on initial application in about 6 months, which my attorney said was faster than usual for cardiac cases. The key was having comprehensive medical records that clearly showed my limitations weren't going to improve significantly. The financial difference has been life-changing - I'm getting about $2,180/month with SSDI versus the $1,490 I would have gotten with early retirement alone. Plus I got about $8,000 in backpay once approved. Don't let anyone pressure you to "try going back to work first" if your doctor says it's dangerous. Your health is more important than SSA's preference for people to attempt work. You've got strong medical evidence - trust the process and be patient with the timeline.
This is incredibly detailed and helpful - thank you for sharing your successful experience! The symptom diary idea is brilliant and something I definitely wouldn't have thought of on my own. I can see how that would give the examiner a much clearer picture of day-to-day limitations rather than just relying on medical test results. The RFC form from your cardiologist sounds like it was a game-changer. I'm going to ask my doctor about filling one of those out - having specific limitations like "no lifting over 10 lbs" and "no high-stress environments" documented officially seems like exactly what SSDI needs to see. Your approval on initial application gives me a lot of hope! The financial difference you mentioned ($2,180 vs $1,490) is almost exactly what I'm looking at too, so that's really encouraging. That extra $690 per month would make such a huge difference in my quality of life. I really appreciate the reminder about not letting anyone pressure me to try going back to work. My cardiologist was very clear about the risks, and I need to trust that medical advice over any pressure to "prove" I can't work by potentially having another cardiac event. Starting my symptom diary today and calling about both applications this week. Thank you again for such practical, actionable advice!
I'm so glad you found this thread and are getting such helpful advice! As someone who went through a very similar situation at 60 after my bypass surgery, I want to echo what others have said about the dual approach being absolutely the right strategy. One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned much - when you're gathering your medical documentation, don't just focus on the major cardiac events. Include records of any ongoing treatments, medication adjustments, follow-up appointments, and especially any notes about exercise restrictions or activity limitations. My cardiologist's notes about restricting me to "light activity only" and "avoid stress" were apparently very important in my approval. Also, if you have any records from cardiac rehab (if you did that) or stress tests that show limitations, those can be really valuable. They provide objective evidence of your functional capacity that goes beyond just the clinical measures. The waiting is definitely the hardest part, but having that early retirement income while you wait for SSDI really does make it manageable. I was approved after about 9 months and the backpay plus the higher monthly amount made such a difference. You're doing everything right by starting this process now and getting organized. With multiple cardiac events and clear medical documentation that returning to high-stress work is dangerous, you have a very strong case. Don't let the statistics about denials discourage you - cardiac cases with solid documentation like yours often have much better success rates. Hang in there and trust the process!
This is such comprehensive advice - thank you for mentioning the importance of including all the follow-up documentation, not just the major events! I hadn't thought about how valuable those routine cardiology notes about activity restrictions would be. My doctor has been very consistent about telling me to avoid stress and limit physical exertion, so I'll make sure to get copies of all those appointment notes. I did do cardiac rehab after my stent procedure, and you're right that those records probably show my limitations pretty clearly. The exercise physiologist there had to modify my program several times because I couldn't tolerate the standard protocols. That's definitely going into my application packet. The 9-month timeline you mentioned is really helpful for planning purposes. It sounds like most people here got approved somewhere between 6-11 months, which gives me a realistic expectation to work with. Having that early retirement income as a bridge is going to be crucial. I'm feeling so much more confident about this whole process thanks to everyone sharing their experiences. It's clear that with good medical documentation and patience, this is very doable. Starting my applications this week and keeping detailed records of everything going forward. Really appreciate all the support and practical advice from this community!
my cousin works for ssa and told me they NEVER automatically give you spousal benefits you have to ask for them specifically!!!! the computer doesn't just figure it out. when i applied i told them i wanted to compare my benefit to my husbands spousal amount and the difference was only $31 more for spousal but still that adds up over time!!!
Just went through this exact situation myself last year! One thing I learned that might help - you can actually create estimates on the SSA website using both scenarios before you apply. Go to ssa.gov and log into your mySocialSecurity account, then use their benefit calculators to get rough estimates of your own benefit vs what 50% of your wife's would be. But here's the key thing everyone's mentioned - your wife absolutely MUST file for her own benefits first before you can claim spousal benefits on her record. That notification she did online is just for planning, not an actual application. Also, consider this timing strategy: if your wife's benefit is higher and she's already 2 years older, she could file at her FRA to start receiving benefits, then when you reach your FRA you could file for whichever is higher (your own or spousal). Just don't file early unless you absolutely need the money, because any reduction is permanent. The online calculators won't be perfect, but they'll give you a ballpark idea of which direction to lean before you deal with trying to get someone on the phone at SSA!
I'm glad you were able to get through to SSA! It sounds like you're on the right track. Just to add another perspective - I work with retirees in my role as a benefits coordinator, and I've seen many cases where people assume their widow benefits are automatically the highest amount they can receive. The delayed retirement credits you've earned by working until 68 could make a significant difference in your monthly payment. Also, don't forget to ask about the Medicare Part D penalty when you meet with them - if you're losing employer drug coverage when you retire, you'll want to enroll in Part D during your Special Enrollment Period to avoid future penalties. Looking forward to hearing how your appointment goes!
I'm so sorry for your loss, Diego. Losing your spouse after so many years together is incredibly difficult, and having to figure out Social Security benefits on top of everything else must feel overwhelming. You've received excellent advice from this community, and I want to reinforce that you're making the absolutely right financial decision. Your strategy of taking survivor benefits now while letting your own retirement benefit grow until 70 is textbook optimal planning. One thing I'd like to add that might help with your long-term planning: once you do switch to your own retirement benefit at 70 (if it's higher), that higher monthly amount will be your base for any future cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs). So not only will you get the maximum benefit from delayed retirement credits, but all future increases will be calculated on that higher amount too. Also, I know you mentioned the SSA website being confusing - you might find it helpful to use the retirement estimator tool on ssa.gov. It can give you a rough projection of what your benefit would be at 70, which will help you compare it to your current survivor benefit amount. Hang in there, and don't hesitate to ask if you have more questions as you approach 70. This community is really supportive and knowledgeable.
That's a really excellent point about future COLAs being calculated on the higher benefit amount, Sophia! I hadn't thought about that long-term impact. It's encouraging to know that waiting until 70 not only maximizes my initial benefit but also means all future cost-of-living increases will be based on that higher amount. I'll definitely check out the retirement estimator tool on the SSA website - having a rough projection of my benefit at 70 would really help me compare it to my current survivor benefit and plan my budget better. Thank you for that suggestion and for the continued encouragement. This community has been such a source of both practical information and emotional support during this difficult transition.
I'm so deeply sorry for your loss, Diego. Losing your husband after 44 years of marriage is heartbreaking, and trying to navigate these complex Social Security rules while grieving just adds another layer of difficulty to an already overwhelming time. You've received absolutely excellent advice from this community, and I want to echo what everyone has said - you're making the optimal financial decision with your current strategy. The disappointment about not being able to collect both benefits is completely understandable, as this is one of the most common misconceptions about Social Security. I wanted to add one practical tip that might help as you continue working until 70: consider requesting a Social Security Statement annually to track how your continued earnings are affecting your projected benefit. Since Social Security calculates your benefit based on your highest 35 years of indexed earnings, these final working years could potentially replace some lower-earning years from earlier in your career, further increasing your eventual benefit at 70. Also, when you do reach 70, I'd recommend contacting SSA about 60 days before your birthday rather than waiting until the month of. This gives them time to process the review and ensures there's no delay in implementing the higher benefit amount if your retirement benefit exceeds your survivor benefit. You're handling this incredibly difficult situation with such wisdom and strength. This community will continue to be here to support you through this journey.
Melody Miles
the whole social security system is designed to confuse people so they take benefits early and get less money lol
0 coins
Eva St. Cyr
•While the system is certainly complex, the reduction in benefits for early filing is actually actuarially neutral over an average lifespan. The system is designed so that, on average, people receive approximately the same total lifetime benefits regardless of when they start claiming. However, individual circumstances vary widely, which is why personalized analysis is so important.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Otto
Have you considered just waiting until your FRA to file? If you can manage financially, that would give you the full $2,070 per month, which is significantly more than the reduced $1,450. Plus, if you need to claim spousal benefits later (like if your husband passes away), you wouldn't have the early filing reduction affecting those benefits. Just something to consider if it's financially feasible for you.
0 coins
Adriana Cohn
•I've thought about waiting, but honestly, I have some health issues and my family doesn't tend to live into their 80s. Plus, I could really use the money now to help my daughter who's going through a divorce. It's such a hard decision!
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•I completely understand considering your health and family history in this decision. That's exactly the kind of personal factor that makes Social Security planning so individual. If you do need the income now and have concerns about longevity, claiming at 62 might make sense for your situation. You could always run a break-even analysis to see at what age waiting until FRA would pay off versus taking benefits now. Given that you're helping your daughter too, the immediate cash flow might outweigh the long-term benefit increase. Have you been able to get specific numbers from SSA about your exact benefits?
0 coins