

Ask the community...
One more important point: make sure you're clear about which type of benefits your son receives. You mentioned DAC (Disabled Adult Child) benefits from his mother's record, which are Title II benefits (sometimes called SSDI). These are different from SSI (Supplemental Security Income), which has much stricter income and resource limits. For DAC benefits, the primary concern is whether he's engaging in Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA). Since he's not earning income from this activity, it's unlikely to affect his benefits, but as others have mentioned, documenting everything and potentially reporting it is a good idea for transparency. I've helped many families navigate these waters, and in your situation, I recommend: 1. Keep detailed records of all sales, expenses, and donations 2. Consider sending a letter to your local SSA office describing the activity 3. Focus on the therapeutic/social aspects of the activity in your documentation 4. Keep the business funds completely separate from personal funds Regarding forming a nonprofit - this adds significant administrative burden without necessarily providing additional protection for his benefits. A simpler approach might be to partner with the existing animal shelter as a program under their nonprofit umbrella.
I'm dealing with a similar situation with my daughter who has autism and receives DAC benefits. She's been making and selling greeting cards at craft fairs, but like your son, all proceeds go to charity (in her case, a local food bank). What I learned from our experience: SSA cares more about the structure and documentation than the actual activity itself. We created a simple written agreement with the food bank showing they receive 100% of proceeds, and we maintain a separate checking account just for this activity. Every penny in gets documented and donated. The key insight our disability attorney shared: frame this as a therapeutic/social activity rather than a business venture in any communications with SSA. Emphasize the social skills development, routine building, and community connection aspects. This helps distinguish it from competitive employment. One practical tip: consider having the animal shelter sell the birdhouses directly rather than your son selling them and donating proceeds. This removes him from the "sales" aspect entirely and makes it clearly volunteer work/donation of goods. Best of luck navigating this - it's wonderful that your son has found something meaningful to do that helps animals!
This is such helpful practical advice! I love the idea of having the animal shelter sell the birdhouses directly - that would completely remove any question about my son being in the "sales" business. And you're absolutely right about framing it as therapeutic activity. The birdhouse making has been amazing for his fine motor skills and gives him such a sense of purpose. I'm going to reach out to the shelter tomorrow to discuss both the partnership idea and potentially having them handle sales directly. Thank you for sharing your experience!
Welcome to the community! As a newcomer here, I wanted to add my voice to this excellent discussion about oil royalties and the Social Security earnings test. I'm currently 62 and just started researching these rules as I plan my own benefit timing. After reading through all the detailed responses, I'm convinced that the consensus is absolutely correct - passive royalty payments from mineral rights do NOT count toward the Social Security earnings limit. The key principle that everyone has emphasized is that the earnings test only applies to income from "substantial gainful activity" - actual work you perform to earn money. Aaron, your situation is really reassuring to see worked out so clearly. With your $15K part-time income, you're well within the $21,240 annual limit, and those quarterly oil royalty payments of $800-1200 are completely separate from that calculation since they're passive income based on ownership rather than labor. What I find most valuable about this thread is how it's provided both the specific answer and the broader understanding of how these Social Security rules work. The distinction between earned vs. unearned income seems fundamental to so many benefit decisions, not just this royalty question. I'm also appreciating all the practical advice about keeping good records and understanding the potential tax implications beyond just the earnings test. This community has created an incredibly comprehensive resource that I'm sure will help many others facing similar questions. Thanks to everyone for such thoughtful and informative responses!
Welcome to the community, Val! As another newcomer, I really appreciate how you've summarized this comprehensive discussion so clearly. You're absolutely right that the consensus throughout this thread has been consistent and well-supported - passive royalty payments definitely don't count toward the Social Security earnings test. What I find most helpful about your perspective is how you've highlighted the fundamental principle behind these rules. Understanding that the earnings test focuses specifically on "substantial gainful activity" rather than all forms of income really helps clarify not just Aaron's royalty question, but how to approach other Social Security planning decisions we might face. Like you, I'm in the early stages of planning my own Social Security strategy, and seeing Aaron's situation resolved so thoroughly - with clear confirmation that his part-time income is safely under the limit while his royalties are completely excluded - gives me confidence that these complex rules can be navigated successfully with the right information. This thread has truly become a masterclass in understanding Social Security earnings rules, and the collaborative knowledge-sharing in this community is exactly what I was hoping to find. Thanks for adding such a thoughtful summary to this already excellent resource!
Welcome to the community! As a newcomer here, I wanted to share how incredibly helpful this discussion has been for understanding the nuances of Social Security earnings rules. I'm currently 61 and starting to plan my retirement strategy, so seeing such a thorough exploration of passive income and the earnings test is exactly what I needed. What really resonates with me is how this thread has demonstrated that while Social Security rules can seem overwhelming at first, they do follow logical principles once you understand the key distinctions. The fundamental concept that the earnings test only applies to income from "substantial gainful activity" - actual work you perform - versus passive income from investments, royalties, and other ownership interests, is crucial for anyone navigating these decisions. Aaron, your situation with the Texas oil royalties has become such a perfect case study. The fact that your $15K part-time income keeps you comfortably under the $21,240 limit while your quarterly royalty payments of $800-1200 don't count at all toward that calculation really illustrates how these rules work in practice. It's a great example of how understanding the earned vs. unearned income distinction can provide real peace of mind. I'm also taking careful notes on all the additional insights shared here about documentation strategies, consulting official SSA sources, and considering the broader tax implications beyond just the earnings test. This comprehensive approach to Social Security planning is exactly the kind of guidance I was hoping to find in this community. Thanks to everyone who has contributed their expertise and experience to create such a valuable educational resource!
This has been such an educational thread to read through! As someone who's 60 and just starting to seriously research Social Security options, I'm grateful for how thoroughly everyone has broken down the complexities here. What really stands out to me is how @Hazel Garcia's specific numbers ($2,300 own benefit vs $1,950 spousal at FRA) create such a clear case study for why waiting makes sense. The deemed filing rule that @Laila Fury explained shows exactly why you can't just "try now and switch later" - that flexibility simply doesn't exist anymore under current law. The personal experiences shared here are so valuable. Reading about people like @Khalil Urso who regret claiming early really drives home the permanent nature of these decisions. But equally important is hearing from @AstroExplorer about being glad they waited, especially with the insight about how spousal health changes can affect the bigger financial picture. I'm definitely adding myself to the growing list of people who need to create that my Social Security account for accurate projections! This discussion has convinced me that getting official numbers rather than working with estimates is crucial for making an informed decision. The point about survivor benefits that several people mentioned is something I hadn't fully considered but adds such an important dimension to the planning process. Thank you to everyone who shared their knowledge and experiences - this thread will be incredibly helpful as I start my own Social Security planning journey!
This thread has been incredibly informative! As someone who's 63 and facing this exact decision, I really appreciate how clearly everyone has explained the current rules. @Hazel Garcia, your situation with the higher own benefit ($2,300) versus spousal benefit ($1,950) at FRA really does make waiting the obvious choice mathematically. What helped me the most was understanding the deemed filing rule that @Laila Fury explained - I had no idea that claiming at 62 means you're automatically filing for both benefits with permanent reductions. This is so different from what I heard my older friends talk about when they were making these decisions! I'm in a similar boat where my own projected benefit would be higher than spousal, but I was tempted by the "bird in the hand" mentality. Reading the experiences from @Khalil Urso and @Geoff Richards about regretting early filing really puts things in perspective - those reduced payments last forever. The point about creating a my Social Security account for exact projections keeps coming up, and I think that's going to be my first step. I've been working with rough estimates, but having the official numbers will make such a difference in confidence about the decision. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed knowledge and personal experiences. This is exactly the kind of real-world guidance that's so hard to find when navigating these life-changing financial decisions!
I'm so sorry you're going through this stressful situation, especially with your wife's recent job loss adding to your worries. As someone who's had to navigate survivor benefits planning, I wanted to share a few thoughts that might help. The information everyone has shared about the family maximum benefit is spot-on - it's typically around 150-180% of the worker's benefit, which means with 3 kids you'll definitely hit that cap. Each child would get less than the theoretical 75% maximum because of this limit. One thing I learned when researching this for my own family is that you can actually call Social Security directly to get a personalized estimate of what the family maximum would be based on your wife's specific earnings record. They can walk through the exact calculation with you over the phone, though as others mentioned, the wait times can be brutal. Given your wife's $85k income and 22 years of work history, you're absolutely right to be looking at significantly more life insurance. The $250k you currently have would probably cover immediate expenses and maybe a year or two of reduced income, but wouldn't provide long-term security for three kids. I'd echo the recommendation to create that my Social Security account immediately - those benefit estimates will be crucial for calculating your insurance needs. And definitely shop around for quotes on term life insurance in the $800k-1M+ range. It seems like a lot now, but when you factor in 15+ years of lost income plus college expenses, it's really not excessive. You're being incredibly responsible by planning for this scenario. I hope you never need to use any of this information, but having a solid plan will give you real peace of mind.
Thank you for sharing your experience and that helpful tip about calling Social Security directly for a personalized family maximum calculation! Even with the long wait times, getting the exact numbers for our specific situation would definitely be worth it for accurate planning. I really appreciate how everyone in this community has been so generous with both technical knowledge and real-world insights. What started as a pretty scary and confusing topic now feels much more manageable with a clear action plan. It's reassuring to hear from multiple people that the $800k-1M+ coverage range makes sense given our situation. When you put it in perspective of 15+ years of lost income plus future college costs, it really isn't excessive at all. I think my next steps are clear: create the my Social Security account this weekend, call SSA for that personalized family maximum estimate (armed with patience for the wait time!), and then start shopping for comprehensive term life coverage. Thanks again for the encouragement and practical advice - this community has been incredibly helpful during a stressful time.
I'm really sorry you're dealing with this stressful situation. As a newcomer to this community, I've been reading through all the excellent advice here and wanted to add one perspective I haven't seen mentioned yet. Since your wife just lost her employer life insurance due to downsizing, you might want to act quickly on getting new coverage. If her job loss was recent, she's probably still in relatively good health for underwriting purposes, but sometimes the stress of unemployment or financial worry can affect health over time. Getting quotes and applying for new coverage sooner rather than later could be beneficial. Also, while everyone's focused on the amount of coverage (which the $800k-1M+ recommendations seem very reasonable), don't forget to consider the insurance company's financial stability ratings. With coverage this large, you want to make sure the insurer will be around and financially sound when benefits might be needed years from now. The systematic approach you've outlined based on everyone's advice sounds perfect - create the Social Security account, get those personalized benefit estimates, and then shop comprehensively for coverage. You're clearly being very thoughtful about protecting your family's future. I hope you never need to use any of this planning, but having it in place will definitely provide peace of mind.
Welcome to the community! That's such an important point about acting quickly while your wife is still in good health for underwriting. The stress of job loss and financial uncertainty can definitely impact health over time, so getting the application process started soon makes a lot of sense. I hadn't thought about the insurance company's financial stability ratings either - with coverage this large and potentially needed many years down the road, making sure the insurer will still be solvent and able to pay claims is crucial. Thanks for bringing up these practical considerations that I might have overlooked while focusing on coverage amounts. It's clear this community has people with experience from all different angles of this complex topic.
Lucas Lindsey
I'm so happy to see this question and all the wonderful, supportive responses! As someone who's been receiving survivor benefits for about 5 years now, I completely understand your concern about protecting those monthly payments - they become such a crucial lifeline after losing a spouse. Everyone here is absolutely right - gifts do NOT affect Social Security survivor benefits in any way! I've received several gifts from family over the years, including one for $19,000 to help with medical expenses and home repairs, and my benefits have never been impacted even slightly. The key thing that helped me understand this was learning that the SSA has very specific definitions of what counts as "income" for benefit purposes. They only care about earned income (wages, self-employment, etc.) and even that only matters if you're under full retirement age and exceed their annual limits. Gifts, inheritances, and other windfalls are completely excluded from their calculations. Your sister is being incredibly generous, and you absolutely deserve to have a safe, well-maintained home. A leaking roof and electrical issues can become serious safety hazards if left unaddressed, not to mention much more expensive to fix later on. Please don't let unnecessary worry about your benefits prevent you from accepting help when you genuinely need it. Take the gift with complete confidence - your survivor benefits will remain exactly the same, and you'll have the peace of mind that comes with having essential repairs finally done. After everything you've been through, you deserve that security and comfort!
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
•Thank you so much, Lucas! Your experience with receiving $19,000 for medical expenses and home repairs with zero impact on benefits is exactly the reassurance I needed to hear. It's amazing how this community has come together to share so many similar real-world experiences - every single person confirms the same thing about gifts not affecting survivor benefits. You're absolutely right about those repairs becoming safety hazards and more expensive if I keep putting them off. I've been so focused on protecting my monthly checks that I almost lost sight of the fact that living with a leaking roof and electrical problems isn't safe either. After reading all these responses from people who have actually been through identical situations, I feel completely confident about accepting my sister's generous gift. Everyone's experiences prove that this is truly a non-issue with Social Security, and I was worrying myself sick over nothing. I'm calling my sister first thing in the morning to say yes, and then I'm finally going to get quotes for that roof repair and electrical work. Thank you to everyone in this community for being so incredibly helpful and supportive - you've all made what felt like a scary decision into an easy one!
0 coins
Melina Haruko
I'm so glad you asked this question because I was in a very similar situation just last year! My late husband's sister offered to give me $17,000 to help with some urgent roof repairs, and I was absolutely terrified it would somehow mess up my survivor benefits. After doing a lot of research and even speaking with someone at my local SSA office, I can confirm what everyone else here is saying - gifts absolutely DO NOT count as income for Social Security survivor benefits! The representative explained that SSA only looks at earned income (wages, self-employment income, etc.) when determining benefit calculations. Gifts, inheritances, and other windfalls are completely separate from their income rules. I ended up accepting the money, got my roof completely redone, and my survivor benefits stayed exactly the same. The SSA has never asked about it or mentioned it in any correspondence. There was no reporting required on my end at all. Your sister sounds like such a blessing wanting to help you with these essential repairs. Don't let fear about your benefits stop you from accepting help when you really need it - especially for safety issues like electrical problems! Take the gift with confidence and get your house properly fixed up. You deserve to have a safe, well-maintained home after everything you've been through.
0 coins