Pennsylvania Unemployment

Can't reach Pennsylvania Unemployment? Claimyr connects you to a live PAUC agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the PAUC
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the PAUC drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a very similar situation - just got my fact finding letter today even though I returned to full-time work about 2 weeks ago. Like many others here, I was initially really confused and worried that I'd done something wrong since I thought my UC claim would automatically close when I stopped filing. Reading Tyler's successful resolution and all the detailed experiences everyone has shared really puts this in perspective as just routine administrative closure rather than something to panic about. I also had one partial week where I honestly reported some orientation hours, so seeing that transparency worked out well for Tyler and others gives me confidence. Planning to respond online this week and definitely keeping all the screenshots and confirmation documentation everyone recommends. It's amazing how this community has turned what initially seemed like a scary letter into understanding it's just standard procedure. Thanks to everyone for sharing their real experiences - it makes such a difference when navigating these UC processes!

0 coins

Carmen, you're absolutely right about how helpful this thread has been! It's incredible to see how many people have gone through the exact same situation and timeline. Your 2-week mark and partial orientation week reporting sounds just like Tyler's experience and so many others here. The pattern is really clear - UC sends these letters as standard procedure for closing out claims properly, not because anyone did anything wrong. The fact that everyone who responded honestly and kept their documentation had smooth outcomes is so reassuring. You're definitely making the right choice responding online this week rather than ignoring it. This community really has been amazing at transforming what looks like a scary official letter into understanding it's just routine paperwork. Make sure to grab those screenshots when you submit - it seems like that's the one piece of advice everyone agrees on! You've got this, and thanks for adding your experience to help future community members who might find themselves in the same boat.

0 coins

I'm going through this exact same situation right now! Just received a fact finding letter yesterday even though I've been back at my full-time job for almost 3 weeks. Reading Tyler's update and everyone's experiences here has been so reassuring - I was initially panicking thinking I had somehow messed up my final claims or that there was an issue with my account. Like several others mentioned, I also had one partial week where I honestly reported some training hours, so seeing that transparency worked out well for Tyler and others gives me a lot of confidence. It's really eye-opening to understand this is just UC's standard administrative process for properly closing benefit years rather than any kind of investigation or problem. I'm planning to respond online this weekend and definitely taking screenshots of everything based on all the great advice throughout this thread. This community has been incredible at turning what initially felt like a really stressful and confusing situation into just understanding it's routine paperwork. Thanks to everyone for sharing their real experiences and positive outcomes - it makes such a huge difference when trying to navigate these UC processes!

0 coins

Malik, you're definitely not alone in this! It's so reassuring to see how this thread has helped so many people in the exact same situation. Your timeline and experience with the partial training week sounds identical to Tyler's and many others here. The pattern is really clear - these letters come out around 2-3 weeks after returning to work as part of UC's standard closure process. I love how this community has evolved from initial panic to understanding it's just routine administrative work. The fact that everyone who responded honestly and kept documentation had smooth outcomes really shows the system works when you follow the process. You're absolutely making the right call responding online this weekend rather than ignoring it. Make sure to grab that confirmation screenshot - it seems like everyone who's been through this swears by keeping that documentation. This thread has been amazing at turning scary-looking official letters into just understanding they're standard paperwork!

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up - if you do mail or fax your appeal, you should include: 1. Your full name 2. The last 4 digits of your SSN 3. Your address and phone number 4. The date of the determination letter you're appealing 5. The reason you disagree with the determination 6. Any evidence that supports your position Also, keep calling the appeals office at 717-787-5122 while you're waiting. Sometimes they can process an appeal over the phone.

0 coins

@b7922ae77013 That's awesome! So glad CareerLink was able to help you get it sorted out. It's frustrating that the online system is so broken, but at least you got your appeal filed in time. Hopefully your hearing goes well - sounds like you have a good case if they wrongfully denied you for misconduct. Keep us posted on how it goes!

0 coins

@b7922ae77013 Glad to hear you got it resolved! CareerLink offices are definitely underutilized - they have so many resources available. For anyone else reading this thread who might have similar issues, I'd also recommend checking if your local library has computers and printers you can use for free. Many libraries also have staff who can help navigate government websites. The PA UC system definitely needs some serious upgrades but at least there are workarounds when the tech fails us.

0 coins

This is such a common issue with the PA UC system! I had similar problems last year when trying to file my initial claim - the website would randomly error out or time out completely. It's really stressful when you're dealing with deadlines and can't get basic functions to work. For future reference, you can also try accessing the site during off-peak hours (like early morning or late evening) when there's less traffic on their servers. Sometimes the errors are just from the system being overloaded. Really glad to see you got it sorted out at CareerLink though! Those offices are a lifesaver when the online systems fail. Good luck with your appeal hearing - make sure to gather any documentation you have that contradicts their misconduct claim (emails, witness statements, company policies, etc.). The burden is on them to prove misconduct, not on you to prove innocence.

0 coins

Don't get your hopes up. I've been waiting on 7 weeks of backpay since MARCH and every time I manage to get through they tell me "it's processing" or "a specialist needs to review it" or some other excuse. The whole system is designed to make people give up!!!! They're hoping you'll just stop trying to collect what they legally owe you.

0 coins

While I understand your frustration, this isn't entirely accurate. The system is definitely overwhelmed and inefficient, but payments do eventually process. The key is to be persistent and make sure you're speaking with the right department. Regular call center staff often can't help with payment release issues - you need to specifically ask for the payments department or a claims examiner.

0 coins

UPDATE: Finally got through to someone at UC this morning! Used that Claimyr service someone mentioned above and it actually worked - got me past the busy signals. The agent said there was a "benefit payment audit flag" on my account that was holding everything up. She released the payments and said I should see the missing weeks deposited within 2-3 business days. Will update again when/if they actually arrive. Thanks everyone for your help!

0 coins

Wow, so glad you got it figured out! I've been dealing with something similar for the past month and was starting to lose hope. That "benefit payment audit flag" thing is probably what's happening to a lot of us. I'm definitely going to try that Claimyr service tomorrow morning. Did they charge you anything for helping you get connected? And thanks for coming back to update us - most people disappear once their issue gets resolved!

0 coins

This is really encouraging to hear! I've been fighting a similar issue for about 3 weeks now - mine shows 4 missing payments from April that just seem to have vanished from the system. Everything looked fine on my dashboard too, no errors or pending issues visible. That "benefit payment audit flag" explanation makes so much sense - it's like a hidden issue that regular users can't see. I'm definitely going to try the Claimyr service first thing Monday morning. Really appreciate you taking the time to update us with the resolution!

0 coins

Just wanted to add my experience to this incredibly helpful thread! I'm new to the UC system and was having the same authentication errors with CareerLink for about two weeks. After reading through everyone's solutions, I tried the incognito browser method that @Isabella Russo suggested and it worked like a charm! Turns out my privacy-focused browser extensions were blocking some of the authentication scripts. What really struck me reading through this thread is how many different technical issues can cause the same error message - browser extensions, DNS settings, VPNs, password managers, even server overload during peak hours. It's honestly ridiculous that PA's system is so fragile, but I'm so grateful for this community sharing all these workarounds. For anyone new to this like me, definitely keep detailed records of your job search activities outside of CareerLink just in case, and don't panic if you can't access the system right away - there's almost always a technical solution. Thanks everyone for making this stressful process a little easier!

0 coins

Welcome to the community @Ravi Sharma! Your experience really highlights how frustrating these technical issues can be, especially when you're new to the system and already stressed about unemployment. It's great that the incognito browser method worked for you too - it seems like that's becoming the go-to first solution for CareerLink login problems. You make such a good point about keeping external records. I learned that lesson the hard way and now I document everything in a spreadsheet with dates, company names, and job descriptions before even trying to enter it into CareerLink. It's saved me so much anxiety knowing I have backup documentation if the system goes down again. This thread has been a lifesaver for so many people dealing with these authentication errors!

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely amazing! I just wanted to chime in as someone who went through this exact same nightmare about 6 months ago. The authentication errors with CareerLink nearly gave me a panic attack because I thought I was going to lose my benefits. After trying everything - different browsers, clearing cache, even calling the useless tech support line multiple times - it turned out to be a combination of my VPN and an outdated version of Chrome. Once I disabled the VPN and updated my browser, everything worked perfectly. The lesson I learned is to try the simple fixes first: incognito mode, disable extensions, update your browser, and turn off any VPN. Also, for anyone dealing with this stress - document EVERYTHING externally. I keep a Google Doc with all my job applications, dates, and contact info. That way even if CareerLink crashes or locks you out, you have proof of compliance. The system is definitely broken but there are almost always workarounds. Don't let the technical issues discourage you from your job search!

0 coins

I went through almost the exact same situation about a year ago - got fired from a warehouse job for missing 7 days over 6 weeks, but most were for legitimate reasons (had pneumonia with doctor documentation, plus a couple days for car issues). Here's what I learned: PA UC absolutely does consider the circumstances of your absences, not just the number. Your doctor's notes for the flu are HUGE - that's documented medical necessity, which PA specifically excludes from willful misconduct. The car breakdowns are trickier, but the fact that you called 2+ hours ahead and the alternative transportation costs show you weren't being careless. I was initially denied (like most people), but won on appeal after about 4 months total. The hearing referee specifically asked about my documentation and efforts to notify my employer. Having everything organized - doctor's notes, text screenshots, even a breakdown of why public transit wasn't feasible - made all the difference. My advice: File ASAP, expect the initial denial, and start preparing for your appeal right away. Keep job searching (PA requires it), and don't let the initial "no" discourage you. With 3 out of 5 absences being documented medical reasons, you're in a much stronger position than you might think. The system is frustrating but it does work for people with legitimate cases like yours.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed experience I was hoping to hear about! It's really reassuring that someone with a similar situation (warehouse job, multiple absences, mix of medical and transportation issues) was able to win on appeal. The 4-month timeline gives me a realistic expectation of what I'm looking at. Your point about organizing everything beforehand is really smart - I'm going to put together a folder with my doctor's notes, text screenshots, and maybe even document the bus route situation like others suggested. It sounds like being thorough with documentation can really make or break these cases. I'm definitely going to file this week and start mentally preparing for the appeal process rather than hoping for an initial approval. Knowing that 3 out of 5 medical absences puts me in a stronger position helps me feel more confident about moving forward. Thanks for sharing your experience and the encouragement - it really helps to hear from people who actually made it through the whole process successfully!

0 coins

I was in almost exactly your situation last year - fired from a restaurant job for attendance issues, but most of my absences were legitimate. Here's what I wish I had known: Your case actually sounds pretty strong! Having doctor's notes for 3 out of 5 absences is a major advantage. PA UC specifically excludes documented medical reasons from "willful misconduct," so those flu days with doctor's notes should work heavily in your favor. For the car breakdown days, the key factors that helped me were: - Giving advance notice (which you did with 2+ hours) - Showing that alternative transportation was unreasonably expensive or time-consuming - Demonstrating this wasn't a pattern of irresponsible behavior I'd recommend documenting everything NOW before you file: 1. Organize those doctor's notes with dates 2. Screenshot any texts you sent to your manager about the absences 3. Maybe research/document the actual Uber costs vs. your daily wage to show it was financially impossible 4. Look up bus routes/times to show the 2+ hour commute wasn't feasible I was initially denied (super common for attendance cases) but won on appeal after about 3 months. The hearing referee was really interested in my documentation and the fact that I had made good faith efforts to notify my employer and find solutions. File your claim this week if you haven't already, keep job searching, and don't get discouraged by an initial denial. With your medical documentation, you have a much better shot than you think. The waiting period sucks, but if you win, you'll get all the back pay from when you first filed.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! Your advice about documenting the Uber costs vs daily wage is brilliant - I never thought to actually calculate and document that, but you're right that it shows it wasn't financially feasible rather than just being lazy about transportation. I'm going to look up what Uber would have cost those days and compare it to what I would have earned. The timeline you mentioned (3 months for appeal) seems consistent with what others are saying, so at least I know what to expect. I'm definitely filing this week and will start organizing all my documentation right away. It's really encouraging to hear from someone who had such a similar restaurant situation and came out successful on the other side. One quick question - when you say you demonstrated it "wasn't a pattern of irresponsible behavior," did you provide your overall attendance record or work history somehow? I'm wondering if showing that I was generally reliable for the 18 months before this would help my case.

0 coins

Great question! Yes, showing your overall employment history can definitely help demonstrate that the recent absences were an anomaly rather than a pattern of poor attendance. For my case, I was able to provide: 1. Any performance reviews or attendance records from previous months/years that showed good attendance 2. Length of employment (your 18 months is actually really good - shows job stability) 3. Any commendations, employee of the month awards, or positive feedback from supervisors If you don't have formal attendance records, you could mention in your appeal statement something like "During my 18 months of employment, I maintained good attendance until this recent period of documented illness and transportation emergencies." The fact that you lasted 18 months in a restaurant job actually speaks volumes - that industry has high turnover, so staying that long suggests you were a reliable employee. When I had my hearing, the referee specifically asked about my overall work history and whether these absences were typical for me. Being able to say "No, this was unusual circumstances during an otherwise stable employment period" really helped my case. Your 18-month tenure gives you credibility that this wasn't just chronic absenteeism.

0 coins

Prev1...7576777879...317Next