


Ask the community...
Great question about the SEP IRA setup! You're absolutely right to be confused - the multiple business scenario isn't well explained in most resources. Here's what I learned after going through something similar: You do need to aggregate ALL your self-employment income across all businesses first, including losses. So your calculation would be: $121,254 (Business A) + $4,912 (Business B) - $65,783 (Business C) = $60,383 total net profit Then subtract your $6,100 in unreimbursed partnership expenses = $54,283 From there, subtract half your SE tax ($4,275 รท 2 = $2,138) = $52,145 adjusted net SE income Your SEP contribution limit would be 20% of $52,145 = approximately $10,429 per partner. This is your individual limit - your wife would calculate hers the same way. The businesses with SEPs can make these contributions for you, but you could also roll over funds between SEP accounts if needed. One thing that caught me off guard: make sure both businesses with SEPs contribute proportionally if you're going to max out. The IRS wants to see that SEP contributions don't discriminate between different employee classes, even when you're the only "employee.
This is really helpful! I'm new to the SEP world and had no idea about the proportional contribution requirement you mentioned at the end. Can you explain what you mean by "contribute proportionally" between the different businesses? Does that mean if I have two SEP-eligible businesses, I can't just max out contributions through one business and ignore the other?
Great question @Lucas Adams! The proportional contribution rule is actually more nuanced than I initially made it sound. You CAN choose to have just one of your SEP-eligible businesses make the entire contribution up to your calculated limit. The proportional requirement I mentioned applies when you have employees in your businesses - you'd need to contribute the same percentage of compensation for all eligible employees across all your businesses. But since you're likely the only participant in your SEPs as a business owner, you have flexibility in which business actually makes the contribution. For example, if your total limit is $10,000, Business A could contribute the full $10,000 to your SEP, or you could split it $7,000 from Business A and $3,000 from Business B. The key constraint is that the total across all sources can't exceed your calculated individual limit. Just make sure whichever business makes the contribution has sufficient cash flow to handle it!
This is such a timely question! I just went through this exact scenario with my CPA last month for my 2024 taxes. One thing I'd add to the excellent explanations already given - make sure you're using the correct self-employment tax calculation when you aggregate across multiple businesses. Since you mentioned having three partnership LLCs, each business should be reporting its share of SE income/loss on your personal return, and the SE tax gets calculated on the combined amount. Also, a heads up on timing: if you haven't already set up the SEP for Business C (the one with the loss), you might want to consider it for future years when it becomes profitable again. You can establish a SEP anytime before your tax filing deadline (including extensions), so there's flexibility there. The $10,429 limit that others calculated sounds right based on your numbers. Just remember that's your personal limit - your wife gets her own identical limit assuming she has the same SE income allocation from the partnerships. One last tip: keep detailed records of which business makes each SEP contribution. It'll make tax prep much easier next year, especially if you end up splitting contributions between Business A and B.
This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I was hoping for! The timing flexibility on setting up the SEP for Business C is something I hadn't considered - that could be really valuable if it swings profitable next year. Quick follow-up question: you mentioned keeping detailed records of which business makes each contribution. For tax reporting purposes, do I need to track this separately on my personal return, or is it just for my own bookkeeping? I want to make sure I'm not creating any compliance issues by having contributions come from different businesses.
I'm a tax professional who has helped many families navigate this exact situation. You're absolutely correct that you don't need to report these 1099-C forms on the estate tax return. When debt is cancelled after death, it's not considered taxable income to either the deceased person or their estate. The key factors in your case are: 1) Your mother passed away in 2019, 2) The 1099-Cs are issued in her name/SSN (not the estate's EIN), and 3) The debt cancellation occurred after her death. This clearly falls under the IRS guidance that post-death debt cancellation is not taxable. Since the estate is insolvent, you're in an even stronger position - there's no scenario where these would create any tax liability. I'd recommend keeping the 1099-C forms with your estate records along with a brief note explaining why they weren't reported, referencing IRS Publication 4681. This creates a clear paper trail if there are ever any questions. The IRS computer systems might generate an automated notice about "unreported income," but these are easily resolved with a simple explanation that the debt was cancelled after the taxpayer's death. Don't let that possibility stress you - it's a common occurrence that's quickly cleared up. You're handling this correctly by being thorough and seeking guidance. Keep good documentation, but rest assured these forms don't create any additional filing requirements or tax obligations for you as executor.
Thank you so much for this professional perspective! As someone who's been handling my first estate and feeling completely overwhelmed by all the tax implications, having a tax professional confirm what everyone else has been saying is incredibly reassuring. Your three key factors really help clarify why this situation is straightforward: mom passed in 2019, the 1099-Cs are in her name/SSN, and the cancellation happened after death. When you lay it out like that, it makes perfect sense why these wouldn't be taxable to the estate. I really appreciate the specific reference to IRS Publication 4681 - I've been trying to figure out exactly which sources to cite in my documentation. Having that official guidance to point to gives me much more confidence in my decision not to report these forms. Your point about automated IRS notices is also really helpful. I was worried about potentially getting scary letters from the IRS, but knowing that it's just their computer systems flagging a mismatch and that it's easily resolved takes a lot of stress off my shoulders. Thanks for taking the time to provide professional guidance on this. It means a lot to have confirmation that I'm handling this correctly, especially when dealing with grief and all the other overwhelming aspects of being an executor for the first time.
I'm dealing with a very similar situation with my mother-in-law's estate. She passed in 2020 and we just received several 1099-C forms in her name totaling about $3,800 for debts that were cancelled in 2023. What really helped me understand this was speaking with our estate attorney, who explained that the timing is everything here. Since the debt cancellation occurred after death, it's not considered income to either the deceased person or their estate. The creditors still have to issue the 1099-C forms because that's their legal requirement, but it doesn't create a tax obligation for us. I ended up creating a simple documentation file that includes: copies of all the 1099-C forms, a one-page summary explaining why they're not being reported (with reference to IRS Publication 4681), and a timeline clearly showing her death date versus the debt cancellation dates. This way if the IRS ever questions it, I have a clear paper trail showing I was aware of the forms and made an informed decision. Since your mom's estate is insolvent, you're in an even clearer position - there's really no scenario where these would create any tax liability. Just keep good records and don't stress about it. The fact that you're being careful and asking questions shows you're handling your executor duties responsibly.
Question for people using their apartments for filming: how are you handling the "exclusive use" requirement for home office deductions? I film in my living room but obviously also use it for personal stuff, so I don't think I can claim it?
As someone who just went through this exact situation last year, here are the key things that would have saved me a lot of stress: 1. **Start tracking everything NOW** - Create a simple spreadsheet with all your TikTok payments, brand deals, and business expenses. Don't wait until tax season. 2. **Open a separate business checking account** - Even if you're not forming an LLC, having all your creator income and expenses in one account makes everything so much cleaner for taxes. 3. **Set aside 25-30% of each payment** - Put this in a separate savings account for taxes. Self-employment tax alone is 15.3%, plus regular income tax on top of that. 4. **You'll need to file Schedule C and Schedule SE** - Schedule C for your business income/expenses, Schedule SE for self-employment tax. TurboTax Self-Employed or similar software can handle this. 5. **For quarterly payments** - Use Form 1040ES. Your first payment for 2025 income is due April 15, 2025. Don't skip these or you'll get hit with underpayment penalties. The good news is once you get the system set up, it's really not that complicated. Just treat your TikTok like the business it is from day one!
This is incredibly helpful! Quick question about the separate business account - do banks require any special documentation to open one for social media income, or can you just open it as a sole proprietor using your SSN? I've been mixing everything in my personal account and it's becoming a nightmare to track. Also, when you say 25-30%, is that pretty accurate even if you're still working a regular W-2 job? I'm worried about either setting aside too much or not enough since I have no idea what tax bracket this will push me into.
Has anyone run into issues with their state's Department of Revenue on this? I'm in Washington state and purchased equipment from an individual last year. Even though federal doesn't require the W9 for asset purchases, our state DOR auditor questioned why we didn't have one during our routine audit.
California CPA here - wanted to chime in since I see clients struggle with this exact question regularly. You absolutely do NOT need a W9 for purchasing a vehicle from an individual, even as a business purchase. The confusion often comes from the $600 threshold rule, but that applies specifically to payments for SERVICES (like hiring a contractor), not asset purchases. When you buy a truck, you're acquiring property, not paying for services rendered. Your documentation should include: bill of sale with VIN, title transfer paperwork, proof of payment (check copy/wire transfer receipt), and sales tax receipt from DMV registration. This creates a complete audit trail without needing any W9 forms. One thing to watch out for - if the seller helps with delivery, installation, or any other services beyond just selling you the truck, those service fees might require separate 1099 reporting. But for a straightforward vehicle purchase, you're all set without the W9.
Thank you for the clear explanation! As someone new to business purchases, this really helps clarify the distinction between asset purchases and service payments. I was getting confused by all the conflicting information online about the $600 threshold. One follow-up question - when you mention keeping the sales tax receipt from DMV registration, does that sales tax get added to the capitalized cost of the vehicle for depreciation purposes, or is it treated as a separate deductible expense?
Peyton Clarke
Just went through a very similar situation with an inherited rental property last year, and I can share what I learned from working with my tax attorney. Your cost basis calculation is actually straightforward once you break it down: the 1/3 you inherited gets stepped-up basis at fair market value on the date of death, and the 2/3 you purchased from the other heirs has a basis equal to what you actually paid them. These two amounts get combined for your total property basis. Regarding IRS scrutiny - they do pay closer attention to rental properties because of the ongoing depreciation deductions, but as long as your numbers are reasonable and well-documented, you shouldn't have issues. The key is keeping detailed records of everything: the death certificate, probate documents, property appraisal (as close to date of death as possible), all purchase agreements with the other beneficiaries, payment records, and your basis calculations. The standard 3-year audit window applies from when you file your return, though it can extend to 6 years if they believe you've substantially underreported income. For inherited property basis calculations, this is rarely an issue unless the numbers look completely unreasonable. One tip: if you paid significantly more or less than the appraised value for the other shares, be prepared to explain why. Market conditions, family agreements, or timing differences are all valid reasons, but having documentation helps if questions arise later.
0 coins
Dylan Fisher
โขThis is really helpful advice, especially about being prepared to explain any significant differences between appraised value and what you actually paid the other heirs. In my case, I ended up paying about $20,000 more than the proportional appraised value because one of the other beneficiaries was in a hurry to settle and we negotiated a quick buyout. I kept all the correspondence and documentation showing the reasoning behind the agreed-upon price, so hopefully that would satisfy any IRS questions about why the purchase price differed from the appraisal. It's reassuring to know that having reasonable explanations and good documentation is usually sufficient for these situations.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
I've been through a similar inheritance situation with a rental property, and the key is treating it as two separate transactions for basis calculation purposes. Your 1/3 inherited portion gets the stepped-up basis (fair market value at date of death), while the 2/3 you purchased has a basis equal to what you actually paid the other beneficiaries. The IRS does scrutinize rental properties more closely because of depreciation deductions, but they're mainly looking for obviously inflated basis claims or missing documentation. As long as your calculations are reasonable and well-supported, you should be fine. For the audit timeline, it's typically 3 years from when you file, but can extend to 6 years if they suspect substantial underreporting of income. In practice, basis challenges on inherited property are rare unless the numbers seem way off. Documentation-wise, keep everything: death certificate, probate papers, property appraisal (get one as close to date of death as possible), all purchase agreements with the other heirs, payment receipts, and your detailed basis calculations. If you paid significantly different from appraised value for the other shares, document the reasoning - family negotiations, market timing, etc. One thing I learned - consider getting a professional appraisal specifically dated at the time of death if the probate appraisal was done months later and market values changed. It's worth the cost for the stronger documentation.
0 coins
Grace Durand
โขThis is excellent advice about treating it as two separate transactions! I'm just starting to navigate this process myself after inheriting part of a family property. One question - when you mention getting a professional appraisal dated at the time of death, how do you actually go about getting a retroactive appraisal? Do appraisers typically do this, and what kind of documentation do they need to establish the value months or even a year after the fact? I'm worried about the cost versus the potential tax benefits, but your point about stronger documentation makes sense given the long-term depreciation implications.
0 coins