


Ask the community...
I've been through this exact scenario! My Bank of America account closed unexpectedly right after I filed, and I was absolutely panicking about my refund. Here's what actually happened: BoA rejected the deposit within 24 hours (they're super efficient with government deposits to closed accounts), and then exactly 21 days later I found a paper check from the U.S. Treasury in my mailbox. The IRS customer service rep I eventually got through to explained that once your bank rejects the deposit, their system automatically triggers a paper check to be mailed to your address on file - no action needed from you. The frustrating part is that the "Where's My Refund" tool never updated to show the status change, so I had no idea when to expect it. My advice: verify your mailing address is correct on your return, then just wait it out. Your substantial refund is safe - it's just taking the paper route instead of electronic! The investment plans can wait a few more weeks. š°
This is incredibly reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same situation with Bank of America! Your 21-day timeline is right in line with what everyone else has been sharing, which gives me so much confidence that this really is just a standard process. I was getting so anxious about my "substantial amount" too since I had plans for it, but you're absolutely right that the investment plans can wait a few more weeks if it means getting the full refund safely. The fact that BoA processed your rejection in just 24 hours is actually really encouraging - at least that part of the process moves quickly! I'm definitely going to stop checking WMR obsessively since it sounds like it's pretty much useless for tracking this situation. Thanks for sharing your exact timeline - it really helps to hear from someone who made it through the whole process successfully! @Keisha Johnson
I'm currently dealing with this exact same situation and reading through everyone's experiences has been incredibly helpful! My Bank of America account got closed unexpectedly last week, just days after I filed my return expecting direct deposit. Based on all the shared timelines here, it sounds like I can expect BoA to reject the deposit within 1-2 business days, then wait about 2-3 weeks for the IRS to mail a paper check. The consistent experiences across different banks really shows this is a well-established process. I'm definitely going to stop obsessing over the Where's My Refund tool since everyone mentions it's unreliable for these situations. It's such a relief to know this is so common and that my refund isn't just lost in the void somewhere! Thanks to everyone who shared their real experiences and timelines - this community support is exactly what I needed during this stressful situation. Now I just need to practice patience and keep a close eye on my mailbox! š¬
I'm dealing with the exact same situation right now. When I entered both 1099-Rs in FreeTaxUSA, it seemed to handle them correctly. The one with code H didn't add anything to my taxable income, but it still showed up in the tax forms. Has anyone used H&R Block software for this situation? Wondering if different tax programs handle these Roth distribution codes differently.
I used H&R Block last year for a similar situation. It worked fine but asked way more questions than necessary about my Roth distributions. Wanted to know details about when I opened the account, how much were contributions vs earnings, etc. Ended up calculating everything correctly, but took longer than it should have.
I went through something very similar last year and can confirm what others have said - you absolutely need to report both 1099-Rs even though one might be completely non-taxable. The code H form for your $12,000 transfer is straightforward - that's a direct rollover between Roth IRAs which isn't taxable but must still be reported. The form without a distribution code for your $8,500 home purchase withdrawal is also likely non-taxable since first-time home buyer distributions from Roth IRAs are penalty-free (though there are some nuances about contributions vs. earnings). One thing to double-check: make sure the amounts on your 1099-Rs match what you actually received. I had an issue where my old broker issued a 1099-R for the gross amount transferred, but my new broker also issued one, creating a discrepancy I had to sort out. Most tax software will handle these correctly if you enter them exactly as shown on the forms, including all the codes. The key is being accurate with the distribution codes in Box 7 - that's what tells the IRS (and your tax software) how to treat each distribution.
This is really helpful, thanks! I'm new to dealing with Roth IRA distributions and was worried I was doing something wrong when I got multiple 1099-Rs. Your point about double-checking the amounts is really important - I should probably verify that the amounts on my forms actually match what I transferred and withdrew. One quick question - you mentioned there are nuances about contributions vs. earnings for the home purchase withdrawal. Since I've had my Roth for 5 years, does that mean the entire $8,500 I took out should be tax and penalty free, or do I still need to worry about which portion was contributions vs. earnings?
Just to add another perspective here - I ran into this exact same issue with my SMLLC last year and ended up getting audited partly because I was inconsistent with how I handled the 1099s. The IRS examiner made it very clear that for 1099-NEC forms, you should use your LLC name and EIN as the payer, even though it's a disregarded entity. She explained that the "disregarded" status only applies to income tax reporting (where your LLC income flows through to your personal return), but NOT to information returns like 1099s. Think of it this way: your contractors worked for "Your LLC Name" not for you personally. That's the business entity they invoiced and that's what should appear on their 1099s. Using your personal name and SSN can create matching problems in the IRS system and potentially trigger notices for both you and your contractors. One tip: make sure your business bank account is also under the LLC name with the EIN. This creates a clean paper trail that matches your 1099 filings.
Thanks for sharing your audit experience - that's exactly the kind of real-world insight that helps clarify this confusing situation! I'm curious about the timing aspect you mentioned. When you filed those inconsistent 1099s, did the audit happen the same year or did it take a while for the IRS to catch the discrepancies? I'm wondering how quickly their matching systems pick up on these issues. Also, you mentioned making sure the business bank account matches the LLC name and EIN. Did the examiner specifically look at bank records to verify the connection between your payments to contractors and the 1099 filings? I want to make sure I have all my documentation properly organized.
This audit insight is incredibly valuable - thank you for sharing! As someone who's been going back and forth on this exact issue, it's reassuring to hear directly from someone who went through an IRS examination. When you mention the examiner clarified that "disregarded" status only applies to income tax reporting but NOT information returns, that really helps explain why there's so much confusion out there. Most of the advice I've been getting has been mixing up these two different purposes. Quick question: during your audit, did they also look at whether you had properly collected W-9s from your contractors? I'm wondering if having complete documentation helped your case even though you had the payer information issue initially.
This is exactly the kind of confusion that trips up so many SMLLC owners! I went through this same dilemma last year and after extensive research and consultation, I can confirm that you should definitely use Option 1 - your LLC name and EIN as the payer on 1099-NEC forms. The key insight is that while your SMLLC is "disregarded" for income tax purposes (meaning the profits flow through to your personal tax return), it's NOT disregarded for information reporting purposes. The IRS treats your LLC as the actual business entity that made the payments to contractors, so that's what needs to appear on the 1099s. This also makes practical sense - your contractors likely have contracts with "My Cornerstone LLC" not with Jane Smith personally. They invoice your business name, you pay from business accounts, so the 1099 should reflect that business relationship. One more tip: make sure you're consistent across all your business filings. Use the LLC name and EIN for all 1099s, and keep your business banking and record-keeping aligned with this approach. It creates a clean paper trail that the IRS can easily follow.
This is such a relief to hear! I've been losing sleep over this exact issue. Your point about the contracts being with the LLC name makes perfect sense - all my contractor agreements are indeed signed with "My Cornerstone LLC" and they send invoices to the business, not to me personally. I think part of my confusion came from conflating the tax treatment (where LLC income flows to my personal return) with the information reporting requirements. It sounds like these are completely separate considerations in the IRS's view. One follow-up question: when you mention keeping business banking aligned, do you mean all contractor payments should come from the LLC's business bank account rather than personal accounts? I've been pretty good about this, but want to make sure I'm not missing anything that could create issues down the road. Thanks for helping clear this up - I feel much more confident about filing these 1099s correctly now!
Sean, I completely understand your confusion - this exact situation trips up a lot of people! The short answer is yes, you absolutely need to report that $650 even without receiving a 1099. The IRS considers all income taxable regardless of whether you get the paperwork. Since your neighbor had you fill out a W9 and paid you over $600, they were actually required to send you (and the IRS) a 1099-NEC by January 31st. You should definitely reach out to them about this - they might have just forgotten or sent it to the wrong address. Here's what you need to do: Report the income on Schedule C (it's simpler than it sounds), and yes, you'll need to pay self-employment tax on it (about 15.3%, so roughly $100). I know that seems like a lot for a weekend job, but it's the law. One silver lining - you can deduct any legitimate business expenses like tools you bought, mileage driving to the job, or even a portion of your phone bill if you used it for work coordination. These deductions can help offset some of that self-employment tax. Don't stress too much about the complexity - most tax software will walk you through the Schedule C process step by step. Better to report it correctly now than deal with IRS letters later!
This is really helpful advice! I'm curious though - for someone like Sean who just did this as a one-time favor, does the IRS really expect them to treat it like a business on Schedule C? It seems like there should be a simpler way to report occasional odd job income without having to file business forms and calculate self-employment taxes for what was basically just helping out a neighbor.
I totally get why this seems unfair for a one-time thing, but unfortunately the IRS doesn't really distinguish between "helping a neighbor" and running a business when it comes to reporting income. Once you fill out a W9 and get paid for services, you're considered an independent contractor in their eyes, regardless of whether it was a favor or not. The good news is that Schedule C isn't as scary as it sounds - most of it won't even apply to Sean's situation. He'd basically just enter the $650 income and any deductions he can claim. The self-employment tax does sting a bit, but that's what covers his Social Security and Medicare contributions since no employer was withholding those taxes. There used to be some discussion about creating a simpler form for occasional workers, but as of now, Schedule C is the only way to report this type of income. At least with modern tax software, it's mostly just answering a few questions rather than manually calculating everything!
I went through something very similar last year with some handyman work I did for a few different people. Made about $900 total across several small jobs, and only got one 1099 even though three different people had me fill out W9s. Here's what I learned: You definitely need to report all of it, even the income without a 1099. I used Schedule C like others mentioned, and while the self-employment tax does hurt (ended up owing about $135), I was able to deduct quite a bit - gas for driving between job sites, some tools I had to buy, even part of my cell phone bill since I used it to coordinate with clients. The key thing is keeping good records. I wish I had tracked my expenses better from the start. For your situation, think about any supplies you bought, mileage to/from the neighbor's house, wear and tear on your equipment, etc. Even small deductions add up. One tip: if you do this kind of work again in the future, consider setting aside about 25-30% of what you earn for taxes. That way you're not surprised come tax time. And definitely follow up with your neighbor about that missing 1099 - they could face penalties from the IRS for not filing it properly.
This is really solid advice, especially about setting aside money for taxes on future odd jobs! I'm dealing with a similar situation - did some pet sitting over the holidays and made about $450. Even though it's under the $600 threshold for requiring a 1099, I'm guessing I still need to report it? Also, for tracking expenses like you mentioned, do you think it's worth using apps or just keeping receipts? I'm worried I'll miss out on legitimate deductions because I'm not organized enough with the paperwork.
Owen Jenkins
I upgraded to FreeTaxUSA Pro this year and have mixed feelings about the value. The CPA access was helpful when I had questions about deducting my home internet bill for work-from-home expenses - they gave me clear guidance on what percentage I could deduct and how to document it properly. However, I found their responses were pretty conservative and didn't offer much beyond what I could find in IRS publications. For straightforward questions, the basic version plus some research might be sufficient. The audit support is nice peace of mind, but honestly most people never get audited anyway. If you're on the fence and your situation isn't too complex, I'd suggest starting with the free version and only upgrading if you run into specific questions you can't answer yourself. You can always upgrade mid-filing if needed, which is what I ended up doing.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
ā¢That's a really practical approach - starting with the free version and upgrading if needed. I'm leaning toward doing exactly that since my situation sounds similar to yours (mostly W-2 with some investment stuff). Did you find the upgrade process smooth when you did it mid-filing, or did you have to re-enter information?
0 coins
Sean O'Brien
I upgraded to FreeTaxUSA Pro last year and found it worthwhile for my specific situation. I had questions about reporting RSUs from my tech job and some freelance income alongside my regular W-2. The tax professional I spoke with was knowledgeable and helped me understand the quarterly payment requirements for my side income that I had been missing. What really sold me on the value was when they caught an error in how I was calculating my estimated tax payments. Their advice saved me from potential penalties, which more than paid for the upgrade cost. The response time was solid - usually got back to me within 12-24 hours. That said, for your situation (W-2, investments, mortgage interest), you might be fine with the basic version unless you have specific questions about things like wash sale rules on your investments or complex itemization scenarios. The basic FreeTaxUSA software handles standard situations really well on its own.
0 coins
Aliyah Debovski
ā¢This is really helpful insight! I'm curious about the quarterly payment requirements you mentioned - is that something that gets complicated when you have both W-2 and freelance income? I have a small amount of freelance work on the side and wasn't sure if I needed to worry about estimated payments since most of my income has taxes withheld already.
0 coins