FYI - employers must make W2s electronically available by January 31 but have until Feb 28 to MAIL them. Your W2 was probably available on your employer's HR portal way before you got the paper copy. TurboTax partners with ADP, Paycom, etc so they can pull W2s electronically as soon as they're available!

This is totally normal and you're not alone in being confused by this! What's happening is that your employer in Iowa submitted your W-2 electronically to the IRS by January 31st (as required by law), and TurboTax has access to this data through their partnerships with payroll companies and the IRS database. The paper W-2 you're waiting for in the mail is really just for your records - the "official" version that matters for tax purposes is already in the system. That's why TurboTax could pull it automatically. For your multi-state situation (Iowa to California), definitely double-check a few things when your paper W-2 arrives: make sure the state tax withholding amounts look correct for the months you worked in each state, and verify that your employer stopped withholding Iowa state tax after you moved to California in August. Sometimes employers mess this up and keep withholding for the wrong state. You can safely proceed with filing using the imported information, but it's always good practice to verify against the paper copy when it arrives. The electronic version is typically 100% accurate since it comes from the same source the IRS uses.

Just curious - does anyone know what the threshold is for when banks/credit unions have to send a 1099-INT? I have accounts at multiple banks and only got forms from some of them.

Just to add another perspective - if you're worried about making mistakes with tax forms like the 1099-INT, you might want to consider using a tax professional for this year, especially since it's your first time dealing with investment income. Many CPAs offer reasonably priced services for straightforward returns, and they can walk you through what to expect in future years. That said, if you're comfortable with TurboTax, it really does make adding 1099-INT information pretty foolproof. The software will ask you simple questions and guide you through entering the information exactly as it appears on the form. Just make sure you have the form handy when you're doing your taxes so you can enter all the numbers accurately.

I work in payroll and see this mistake ALL the time. The 2020 form change has created so much confusion. Your best bet is to contact whoever is handling the payments (likely HR or the benefits department) and explain that beneficiary payments should go on 1099-MISC Box 3, not 1099-NEC. Most companies actually want to get this right because incorrect filing causes problems for them too!

This is exactly the kind of frustrating situation that highlights how confusing the 2020 form changes have been! As others have mentioned, you're absolutely right to question this - beneficiary payments should NOT be on a 1099-NEC since you didn't perform any services. I'd recommend taking a two-pronged approach: First, contact the company's benefits or payroll department with a clear explanation that these are beneficiary payments from your father's retirement package, not contractor work. Reference IRS guidelines that beneficiary payments should be reported on 1099-MISC Box 3. Second, once you get the corrected forms, definitely file amended returns (Form 1040-X) for the years you incorrectly paid self-employment tax - that money should come back to you. Document everything in writing when you contact the company. Many payroll departments are still figuring out the post-2020 form requirements, so being clear and specific about the nature of the payments will help them get it right going forward.

Just went through this exact situation for my 2023 return! One thing I learned that wasn't mentioned yet - if you're a graduate student, be extra careful because graduate assistantships are treated differently than undergraduate Pell Grants. Also, don't forget about the Lifetime Learning Credit as an alternative if you don't qualify for the American Opportunity Credit. I used the IRS Interactive Tax Assistant tool that @Yuki mentioned and it was really helpful for walking through the qualified vs non-qualified expense allocation. Pro tip: save screenshots of your calculations and keep copies of your school's itemized billing statements - they're much more detailed than the 1098-T and show exactly what charges the grants were applied to.

Thanks for all the detailed responses! This is incredibly helpful as a first-time filer dealing with educational expenses. I have a follow-up question about timing - my school disbursed my Pell Grant in August 2023 for the fall semester, but I also had spring 2024 expenses that were paid in January 2024. Should I only consider the expenses that were actually paid in 2023 for my 2023 tax return, or can I allocate my 2023 Pell Grant toward spring semester expenses that were billed in 2023 but paid in 2024? The 1098-T shows payments made during the tax year, but I'm not sure how to handle the timing mismatch between when grants were received versus when expenses were actually paid. Has anyone dealt with this cross-year situation?

Does anyone know how you're supposed to show on your tax return that a 1099-K isn't for taxable income? Like if I got a 1099-K from PayPal for $900 in cash back from Rakuten but I don't put it on my return anywhere, won't that trigger a mismatch that could get me audited?

I went through this exact same situation last year and can confirm what others have said. The key thing to understand is that the 1099-K is just a reporting mechanism - it doesn't determine what's actually taxable. For your Rakuten and TopCashback earnings, since these were cash back on personal purchases, they're considered purchase rebates/discounts, not taxable income. Think of it like getting a coupon discount - you wouldn't pay taxes on money you saved with a coupon, and cash back works the same way. I kept a simple spreadsheet showing my original purchase amounts and the corresponding cash back received to demonstrate the connection between the two. My tax preparer said this was good documentation in case of any IRS questions. The frustrating part is that PayPal has to issue these forms because they're just reporting money that flowed through their platform - they can't determine the tax nature of each transaction. So you'll get a 1099-K even for non-taxable rebates. Bottom line: Don't stress about it. Your $240 + $175 in cash back from shopping portals on personal purchases isn't taxable income, regardless of the 1099-K forms you received.