IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

16 Just curious - has anyone successfully gotten their employer to issue a corrected W-2 for this situation instead of waiting to claim it on taxes? My payroll person suggested this might be possible but wasn't sure of the process.

0 coins

8 Employers generally won't issue a corrected W-2 for SS overwithholding in multiple-employer situations. The W-2 from each employer should correctly reflect what they actually withheld, even if the combined amount exceeds the maximum. The IRS expects you to reconcile this on your tax return rather than having employers issue corrected W-2s. This is specifically addressed in the instructions for Form 1040, where you claim the excess Social Security tax withholding as a credit.

0 coins

This is such a frustrating situation that so many people face! I went through the exact same thing last year with my part-time consulting gig. One thing I discovered is that some employers are more willing to work with you if you can show them the specific IRS guidance. Publication 15 (Circular E) actually addresses this scenario and explains that while employers must withhold SS tax up to the wage base, they can stop if an employee provides sufficient documentation that the limit has been reached across all employers. The key is presenting it as helping THEM avoid potential administrative headaches rather than just asking for a favor. When I framed it that way - explaining that continuing to withhold would just create unnecessary paperwork when they eventually have to reconcile everything - my employer was much more receptive. Also worth noting that if you're planning to stay at both jobs into next year, this same issue will come up again in 2024 with the new wage base limit. Might be worth establishing the process now so it's easier to handle next year!

0 coins

Just wanted to share my experience since I had this exact same question a few months ago! In my case, "Medical EE - SR" stood for "Medical Employee - Standard Rate" which was my contribution to the company health insurance plan. What really helped me was requesting a detailed breakdown of all deductions from payroll. Most companies are required to provide this if you ask, even if it takes them a while to respond. They sent me a document that explained every single code on my pay stub, which was super helpful for understanding not just the medical deduction but also things like life insurance, disability, and other benefits I didn't even know I had. The $87.50 biweekly amount sounds about right for employee-only standard tier coverage. One thing I'd suggest is making sure you're actually using the benefits you're paying for - I discovered I was paying for dental coverage that I never used because I already had dental through my spouse's plan. Saved me about $30 per paycheck once I dropped the duplicate coverage during open enrollment. If your HR is slow to respond via email, try calling them directly or stopping by in person if possible. Sometimes a quick 5-minute conversation can clear up what might take weeks of back-and-forth emails to resolve.

0 coins

This is really great advice about requesting a detailed breakdown from payroll! I never thought about asking for that - I just assumed the cryptic codes on my pay stub were something I had to figure out on my own. Your point about duplicate coverage is especially helpful. I should probably do an audit of all my benefits to make sure I'm not paying for things I don't need or already have covered elsewhere. The dental example you mentioned makes me wonder if I might have similar overlaps. I think I'll try calling HR directly like you suggested. Sometimes it's just easier to have a real conversation rather than trying to explain everything in an email and waiting days for a response. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's reassuring to know I'm not the only one who was confused by these deduction codes!

0 coins

I had this exact same confusion when I first started working! "Medical EE - SR" typically means "Medical Employee - Standard Rate" and represents your portion of the health insurance premium that gets deducted from your paycheck. The "EE" definitely stands for "Employee" to distinguish it from employer contributions. One thing that really helped me understand all my deductions was downloading my pay stub and looking at it alongside my benefits enrollment materials. Most companies provide a benefits guide during onboarding that breaks down all the different plan options and their costs. If you can't find yours, definitely ask HR for a copy - it should show exactly what "SR" means at your specific company (could be Standard Rate, Senior Rate, or even Single Rate depending on your employer). The $87.50 biweekly amount seems very reasonable for employee-only health coverage. That works out to about $2,275 annually, which is actually on the lower end for decent health insurance these days. Just make sure you're enrolled in the plan that makes the most sense for your healthcare needs - sometimes people pick the middle-tier option without really comparing what they'd actually use versus the cost savings of a basic plan. If HR is being slow, try giving them a call directly rather than email. In my experience, a quick phone conversation often resolves these questions much faster than waiting for email responses!

0 coins

This is really helpful! I'm new to understanding payroll deductions and this whole thread has been incredibly informative. The $87.50 biweekly amount the original poster mentioned actually seems pretty good compared to what some of my friends are paying at their jobs. I'm curious though - when you mention comparing what you'd "actually use" versus cost savings of a basic plan, how do you predict your healthcare usage for the year? I'm young and generally healthy, but I worry about unexpected medical issues. Is there a good rule of thumb for deciding between basic and standard plans? Also, does anyone know if these pre-tax health insurance deductions affect things like Social Security or unemployment benefits calculations, since they reduce your taxable income?

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

One thing to watch out for if you're new to S-Corp health insurance reporting - make sure you understand the timing requirements. The health insurance premiums need to be paid by your S-Corp during the tax year to qualify for the deduction in that same year. I learned this the hard way when I tried to reimburse myself in January for premiums I had personally paid in December of the prior year. The IRS doesn't allow that - the S-Corp itself must make the payments directly to the insurance company or through payroll during the actual tax year you're claiming the deduction. Also, if you have employees, you'll need to make sure health insurance is available to them on the same terms, or there are specific ownership percentage rules that apply. This gets complex quickly if you have other shareholders or employees, so definitely consult a tax professional if your situation isn't straightforward single-owner S-Corp.

0 coins

This timing requirement is so crucial and I wish someone had told me about it earlier! I made a similar mistake where I was personally paying the premiums and then trying to reimburse myself from the S-Corp at year-end. Had to scramble to restructure how we handle it going forward. One follow-up question though - if you have a single-member S-Corp with no other employees, do you still need to worry about the "same terms" requirement for employees? Or does that only kick in once you actually have W-2 employees other than yourself? Also, for the direct payment requirement, does it matter if the S-Corp pays the insurance company directly versus paying it through payroll as additional compensation that you then use to pay the premiums yourself?

0 coins

Lara Woods

•

@MidnightRider Great questions! For single-member S-Corps with no other employees, you don't need to worry about the "same terms" requirement - that only applies when you have actual W-2 employees other than yourself as the owner. Regarding payment method, both approaches can work, but there's an important distinction. If the S-Corp pays the insurance company directly, it's cleaner and easier to document. If you go the payroll route (S-Corp pays you additional compensation that you use for premiums), make sure the extra compensation amount specifically corresponds to the insurance premiums and is properly documented as such. The key is that the S-Corp must be the entity ultimately funding the premiums during the tax year, and you need to be able to show that connection clearly. Direct payment to the insurance company is usually the simpler path and leaves less room for documentation issues. Also, whichever method you choose, stick with it consistently throughout the year - switching back and forth can create confusion during tax preparation.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of confusion I went through when I first elected S-Corp status for my LLC! One thing that really helped me was creating a simple monthly checklist to stay on top of the health insurance reporting requirements. Here's what I do now: At the beginning of each year, I calculate my total expected health insurance premiums and make sure my S-Corp has enough budgeted for payroll taxes on that additional compensation. Then each month when I process payroll, I include 1/12th of the annual health insurance amount in my W-2 wages, even if the actual premium gets paid at a different time in the month. This approach keeps everything consistent and makes year-end much smoother. I also set up a separate business checking account specifically for employee benefits (even though I'm the only employee), which makes tracking these payments super clear for my bookkeeper and accountant. The key insight that took me a while to understand is that you're essentially paying yourself additional wages equal to the health insurance cost, then taking a personal deduction for those same premiums. Once you think of it that way, the whole process makes much more sense!

0 coins

Natalie Khan

•

This monthly approach is brilliant! I've been struggling with the inconsistent timing between when I pay the premiums (usually around the 15th) and when I run payroll (1st of each month). Your suggestion to include 1/12th in each payroll run regardless of when the actual premium payment happens really simplifies things. Quick question about the separate checking account - do you transfer money into that account specifically for the health insurance payments, or do you use it for all employee-related expenses? I'm trying to decide if it's worth the extra complexity of managing another account versus just being more diligent about categorizing expenses in my main business account. Also, have you found that spreading it evenly across 12 months creates any issues if your actual premium amounts change mid-year due to plan changes or rate increases? I'm wondering if I should true-up the amounts quarterly or just handle any differences in December.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

This is a really troubling situation that unfortunately happens more often than people realize, especially with smaller companies that don't have dedicated payroll departments. Your sister and her coworkers are dealing with what's essentially employer negligence in payroll tax compliance. First thing - they need to act fast. The company is legally obligated to withhold federal taxes, and their failure to do so doesn't absolve employees of their tax liability, but it does give them grounds for penalty relief from the IRS. Here's what I'd recommend: 1. **Document everything immediately** - Get copies of all paystubs, W-4 forms, and any communication about the direct deposit switch 2. **File taxes on time** - Even if they can't pay, filing prevents failure-to-file penalties which are much worse 3. **Contact the IRS** - Set up payment plans and request penalty abatement due to "reasonable cause" (employer error). The IRS is often willing to waive penalties when underpayment wasn't the taxpayer's fault 4. **Approach the employer as a group** - There's strength in numbers, and this affects multiple people. The company may be willing to provide assistance or bonuses to help with the unexpected tax burden 5. **Report to appropriate agencies** - File complaints with both the IRS and Department of Labor about the employer's failure to comply with withholding requirements The company could face serious penalties for this, so they have strong incentive to work with the employees to resolve it. Don't let them dismiss this as "just a mistake" - people's financial wellbeing is at stake here.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm curious though - when you say the IRS is "often willing" to waive penalties for employer error, how strong is that case actually? Like what percentage of people in this situation actually get penalty relief? I'm asking because my cousin went through something similar last year and the IRS still hit him with penalties even though it wasn't his fault. Is there specific language or forms they should use when requesting the abatement to make it more likely to succeed?

0 coins

Jayden Reed

•

Great question! The success rate for penalty abatement due to "reasonable cause" varies, but employer withholding errors are actually one of the stronger cases you can make. The key is in how you present it to the IRS. Your cousin might have had better luck if he used Form 843 (Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement) and specifically cited "reasonable cause" under IRC Section 6664(c). The magic words are demonstrating that the underpayment occurred "despite the exercise of ordinary business care and prudence." When the employer fails to withhold taxes that should have been withheld, and you have documentation proving this (like paystubs showing zero withholding when there should have been withholding), that's textbook reasonable cause. Include a detailed explanation of what happened, copies of paystubs, and any correspondence with the employer about the issue. The IRS also has a "First Time Penalty Abatement" policy that can work even if reasonable cause doesn't - if someone has been compliant for the previous 3 years, they'll often waive penalties for first-time issues regardless of the cause. Your cousin might want to try requesting abatement again with better documentation if he hasn't already.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

This is a really serious situation that your sister and her coworkers need to address immediately. Unfortunately, what happened to them is not legal - employers are absolutely required by federal law to withhold income taxes, Social Security, and Medicare taxes from employee paychecks. The fact that this happened to multiple employees when they switched to direct deposit suggests either a major payroll system error or negligence on the company's part. Either way, the company is liable for failing to meet their legal withholding obligations. Here's what they should do right now: **Immediate steps:** - Gather all paystubs and direct deposit records to document the lack of withholding - File their tax returns on time even if they can't pay - this prevents additional failure-to-file penalties - Contact the IRS to set up payment plans (they have reasonable monthly options) **Dealing with the employer:** - Approach management as a unified group - there's power in numbers here - Demand immediate correction of the withholding going forward - Ask if the company will provide financial assistance (bonuses, etc.) to help with the unexpected tax burden - Get everything in writing - no verbal promises **Penalty relief:** They should absolutely request penalty abatement from the IRS based on "reasonable cause" since this was employer error, not their fault. The IRS often waives penalties when underpayment resulted from circumstances beyond the taxpayer's control. They should also consider reporting this to the Department of Labor and filing a complaint with the IRS about the company's failure to comply with employment tax laws. The company could face significant penalties, which gives them strong incentive to help resolve this situation. Don't let the company brush this off as a minor mistake - people are facing serious financial hardship because of their failure to follow federal tax law.

0 coins

This is excellent comprehensive advice! I just want to emphasize how important the "unified group" approach is here. When multiple employees present a united front, it's much harder for the company to dismiss or minimize the issue. One additional point - they should also request copies of their W-4 forms from HR to verify that they properly elected tax withholding. If the W-4s show they requested withholding but the company failed to implement it, that's even stronger evidence for their penalty abatement requests with the IRS. Also, if anyone is struggling financially because of this situation, they might qualify for Currently Not Collectible status with the IRS while they get back on their feet. The IRS can temporarily suspend collection activities if paying the tax would cause financial hardship. Just another option to explore alongside the payment plans.

0 coins

This is such a comprehensive discussion on S-Corp partnership accounting! As someone who's been managing these complexities for several years, I'd like to add a few practical tips that have helped me streamline the process. First, I highly recommend creating a quarterly reconciliation schedule that tracks your K-1 income estimates versus actual distributions received. Most partnerships provide quarterly estimates, and tracking these helps you anticipate year-end adjustments and plan for any tax distributions needed. Second, don't overlook the importance of understanding your partnership's distribution policy. Some partnerships distribute based on current year income, while others may distribute prior year earnings or even return capital. Understanding this policy helps you predict cash flow and avoid basis surprises. Finally, for QBO users, I suggest creating a dedicated class or location code for all partnership-related transactions. This makes it much easier to pull reports showing all activity related to your LLC investments when it's time to prepare your 1120S or when your CPA needs supporting documentation. One last note - if your S-Corp has significant partnership investments, consider whether quarterly estimated tax payments are necessary. The timing differences between K-1 income and distributions can create cash flow challenges when personal tax bills come due, especially if the partnership retains most of its earnings.

0 coins

Luca Greco

•

This is exactly the kind of systematic approach I wish I had implemented from day one! Your quarterly reconciliation schedule idea is brilliant - I've been scrambling at year-end trying to figure out where all the discrepancies came from. Quick question about the class/location tracking in QBO - do you use this for both the income recognition AND the distribution transactions? I'm wondering if that would help me generate cleaner reports for my CPA instead of having to manually pull together all the partnership-related entries. Also, your point about quarterly estimated taxes is spot on. Last year I got hit with underpayment penalties because I didn't account for the K-1 income that wasn't distributed. Do you have a rule of thumb for calculating what percentage of undistributed K-1 income to set aside for taxes? I'm trying to avoid that cash crunch this year.

0 coins

Based on my experience with similar S-Corp/partnership structures, here's a systematic approach that's worked well for me: For your specific example ($45K K-1 income vs $35K distributions), the journal entry in QBO would be: Debit: Investment in LLC Partnership $45,000 Credit: Partnership Income $45,000 Then separately record the distribution: Debit: Cash $35,000 Credit: Investment in LLC Partnership $35,000 This leaves you with a $10,000 increase in your investment account representing undistributed earnings, and $45,000 of income flowing to your 1120S regardless of the cash received. One critical point - make sure you're tracking your tax basis separately from your book basis, especially if the partnership has debt that affects your basis calculation. The K-1 should show your share of partnership liabilities which increases your basis for tax purposes but doesn't necessarily affect your QBO investment account. Also, consider setting up a monthly accrual entry if you can reasonably estimate quarterly income. This smooths out the cash flow impact and helps with interim financial reporting. Many partnerships provide monthly or quarterly income estimates that make this feasible. The key is consistency - pick a method for handling the timing differences and stick with it throughout the year. Your 1120S will always report the full K-1 income regardless of distributions, so focus on making sure your investment account properly tracks your economic interest in the partnership.

0 coins

Keisha Brown

•

This is really helpful, Mohamed! I appreciate the clear journal entry examples. One follow-up question - when you mention tracking tax basis separately from book basis, are you suggesting maintaining a completely separate schedule outside of QBO for the tax basis calculation? I'm particularly concerned about the partnership debt aspect you mentioned. Our LLC has some equipment financing that I think affects my basis, but I'm not sure how to properly account for that in my S-Corp books. Should that debt impact the Investment in LLC account in QBO, or is that something that only matters for the tax basis tracking? Also, your point about monthly accruals is intriguing. Do you reverse those accrual entries when you get the actual K-1, or do you just adjust the final quarter to true up to the actual amounts? I'd love to smooth out the financial reporting but want to make sure I'm not creating more complexity than necessary.

0 coins

Prev1...745746747748749...5643Next