IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I've been there and it's incredibly frustrating! A few things that have helped me get through IRS calls successfully: First, always test your audio immediately when they pick up - say "Hello, can you hear me clearly?" before diving into your issue. If there's any problem, ask to be transferred right away rather than struggling through a bad connection. Also, try calling from different phones/locations - I've had better luck with landlines or even switching from WiFi to cellular data. The IRS phone system is notoriously outdated, so sometimes it's just a matter of finding the right connection. Don't give up though - document each attempt and mention previous technical difficulties when you call back. The agents are usually understanding since this happens constantly with their ancient phone infrastructure!

0 coins

Maya Patel

•

This is really solid advice! I especially like the tip about testing audio immediately - I made the mistake of launching into my complex tax question before realizing they couldn't hear me properly. The suggestion about switching from WiFi to cellular (or vice versa) is something I hadn't considered but makes total sense. It's oddly comforting to know that even the IRS agents expect these technical issues with their "ancient phone infrastructure" as you put it! I'm definitely going to be more strategic about my next attempt rather than just hoping for the best. Thanks for the encouragement and practical tips! šŸ’Ŗ

0 coins

I've dealt with this exact same frustrating situation! Here's what finally worked for me after multiple failed attempts: First, before you even explain your tax issue, do a quick audio check by saying "Can you hear me clearly?" and wait for confirmation. If there's ANY issue (static, cutting out, them asking you to repeat), immediately request a transfer - don't waste time trying to make a bad connection work. I also found that using a regular phone line instead of cell phone helped tremendously. If you only have a cell phone, try moving to different locations in your house or switching between WiFi calling and regular cellular. The IRS phone system is incredibly outdated and the agents deal with these audio problems constantly, so they're usually very patient about reconnecting you. One last tip: when you do call back, mention upfront that your previous call had technical difficulties - this helps them understand why you're calling again and they'll often try to get you connected to better equipment. Don't give up - you'll eventually get through to someone with a clear connection!

0 coins

This is incredibly thorough and helpful advice! I'm definitely going to try the immediate audio check approach next time - it makes so much sense to verify the connection works before wasting time on a complex tax explanation. The tip about mentioning previous technical difficulties when calling back is brilliant too, I never would have thought of that but it could really help the agent understand the situation better. It's somewhat reassuring (and frustrating) to know this is such a widespread issue with their outdated system. I really appreciate you taking the time to share such detailed guidance - it gives me hope that I'll eventually get through with a working connection! šŸ™

0 coins

Great discussion everyone! As someone who's been wrestling with similar questions for my own small business, I wanted to add a perspective on the HSA vs FSA decision that might help others. One thing that hasn't been mentioned much is that you can actually have BOTH an HSA and a limited-purpose FSA if you structure it correctly. The limited-purpose FSA can only be used for dental and vision expenses, but it still gives you that extra $3,200 in tax-advantaged spending for those specific categories. This might be worth considering if you have significant dental work planned or wear glasses/contacts. You get the best of both worlds - the HSA for general medical expenses and long-term investment growth, plus the FSA for dental/vision with the same-year tax deduction. That said, after reading through Leo's experience with the compliance nightmare, I'm definitely leaning toward just maxing out the HSA and keeping things simple. Sometimes the administrative peace of mind is worth more than the extra tax savings, especially when you're trying to run a business at the same time. Has anyone here tried the limited-purpose FSA route, or is that just adding unnecessary complexity to an already complicated decision?

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

That's a really interesting point about the limited-purpose FSA option! I hadn't considered that you could potentially stack them. However, after reading through all the compliance horror stories from Leo and others, I think I'm solidly in the "keep it simple" camp now. The administrative burden for even a limited-purpose FSA would still involve all the same Section 125 plan documents, claim substantiation requirements, and potential audit documentation. For $3,200 in dental/vision savings, that feels like a lot of extra paperwork when you're already dealing with running a business. I'm leaning toward Omar's approach - just max out the HSA and call it a day. The investment growth potential and administrative simplicity seem like they'd more than make up for missing out on the additional FSA tax advantages. Plus, if I really need extra tax-advantaged medical spending, I can always pay expenses out of pocket and let the HSA grow, then reimburse myself later with no time limit. Thanks for bringing up the limited-purpose option though - it's good to know all the possibilities even if I decide the complexity isn't worth it for my situation!

0 coins

After reading through this entire thread, I'm convinced that for single-member LLCs, the HSA route is definitely the way to go if you qualify. The compliance burden for self-administered FSAs seems absolutely brutal for such a small tax benefit. I went through a similar analysis last year and ended up with an HSA through HSA Bank. The setup was incredibly straightforward - just had to verify my high-deductible health plan met the IRS requirements and I was good to go. No plan documents, no ERISA headaches, no "use it or lose it" stress. One thing I'd add to Omar's excellent points about HSAs: you can also use them for things like over-the-counter medications, menstrual products, and even certain health-related apps and devices. The qualified expense list is actually pretty comprehensive and keeps expanding. For anyone still considering the FSA route after reading Leo's compliance nightmare story, just remember that even one mistake in your plan documents or claim substantiation could trigger penalties that would wipe out years of tax savings. The risk-adjusted return on FSA self-administration just doesn't make sense for most solo operations. Stick with the HSA, invest the funds in low-cost index funds, and enjoy the simplicity. Your future self will thank you for not getting bogged down in FSA paperwork when you could be focusing on growing your business instead.

0 coins

Olivia Garcia

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone just starting to research this topic for my own single-member LLC, I'm grateful for all the real-world experiences shared here. Zoe's point about the risk-adjusted return really hits home - it sounds like even a small compliance mistake could wipe out years of modest tax savings. I'm definitely going to look into HSA eligibility first. My current health plan might not qualify as high-deductible, but it's worth exploring whether switching plans during open enrollment would make sense. The investment growth potential and administrative simplicity seem like huge advantages over the FSA compliance maze. One quick question for those who went the HSA route: did any of you have to adjust your health insurance coverage to qualify, and if so, was the premium difference significant enough to affect the overall cost-benefit analysis? Thanks again everyone for sharing your experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical guidance that's hard to find elsewhere!

0 coins

Your 82% on the first practice test is actually really encouraging! I just passed the Intuit Academy Tax Level 1 certification last month and started with very similar scores. What I found most helpful was treating each practice test as a diagnostic tool rather than just a score to beat. After each test, I'd spend time categorizing my wrong answers into themes - like "missed filing status rules" or "confused dependency qualifications" - which helped me see patterns I wouldn't have noticed otherwise. The real exam definitely emphasizes scenario-based questions where you need to apply multiple concepts together. For example, you might get a question about a divorced parent claiming a child as a dependent, which requires you to understand both dependency rules AND filing status implications simultaneously. One specific tip that made a huge difference: practice explaining tax concepts out loud as if you're teaching someone else. I found that when I could clearly articulate WHY a particular rule applies in a given situation, I was much better prepared for those complex application questions on the actual exam. Keep working through all the practice tests - you're building a solid foundation, and consistent scores in the mid-80s should definitely give you confidence to schedule the real exam. The format is very similar, just with more nuanced scenarios that test your understanding rather than just recall.

0 coins

This approach of treating practice tests as diagnostic tools is brilliant! I'm just beginning my preparation for the Intuit Academy Tax Level 1 certification and your method of categorizing wrong answers into themes sounds like it would be much more effective than just reviewing individual questions. Your example about the divorced parent scenario really illustrates how the exam tests interconnected concepts rather than isolated rules. I can see how that would require a deeper understanding than just knowing the dependency rules or filing status rules separately. The tip about explaining concepts out loud as if teaching someone else is something I definitely want to try. It makes sense that if you can clearly articulate the reasoning behind a rule, you'd be better prepared for those application-heavy questions everyone keeps mentioning. Thanks for sharing such practical advice! It's really reassuring to hear that starting around 82% can lead to success with the right preparation strategy. Your emphasis on understanding the "why" behind rules rather than just memorizing them aligns with what several others have mentioned in this thread.

0 coins

Just wanted to add my perspective as someone who recently completed the Intuit Academy Tax Level 1 certification! An 82% on your first practice test is actually quite solid - I started around 79% and was feeling pretty discouraged initially. What really helped me bridge the gap between practice tests and the actual exam was focusing on the interconnected nature of tax concepts. The real exam doesn't just test whether you know individual rules - it tests whether you can apply multiple rules together in complex scenarios. For example, you might encounter a question about a college student who works part-time, lives with their parents part of the year, and provides some of their own support. This requires understanding dependency tests, filing requirements, education credits, AND earned income rules all at once. I found that creating "decision trees" for complex topics like filing status and dependency determinations was incredibly helpful. Instead of memorizing isolated facts, I mapped out the logical flow of questions you need to ask to reach the right conclusion. Also, don't underestimate the importance of timing practice. The actual exam has that 90-minute limit, and you need to be comfortable making decisions without second-guessing yourself too much. Practice tests under timed conditions really helped me build that confidence. Keep at it - you're definitely on the right track with your methodical approach to working through all the practice tests!

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

Has anyone here used TurboTax for this kind of situation? I also get a car allowance from my employer AND use my car for my side business. Wondering if TurboTax handles this well or if I need to pay for a CPA this year.

0 coins

I tried doing this in turbotax last year and it was a nightmare. It doesnt have a clear way to handle the situation where you get a w2 stipend AND claim business use. I ended up having to manually override some calculations and im not sure if i did it right. This year im using a cpa because vehicle deductions are audit triggers.

0 coins

I went through this exact situation last year with my consulting business and W2 job that provided a vehicle allowance. The key thing to understand is that you absolutely CAN claim depreciation on the business portion of your vehicle even while receiving a W2 stipend - they're completely separate tax situations. Here's what worked for me: I calculated my total business mileage (excluding the W2 job miles since that's covered by the stipend) and divided by total miles driven to get my business use percentage. For a $45k truck, if you use it 60% for your own business, you can depreciate 60% of the cost. Keep detailed mileage logs with dates, destinations, and business purposes. I use a simple spreadsheet that tracks: date, starting odometer, ending odometer, destination, and whether it's personal, W2 job, or my business. This documentation is crucial if you're ever audited. One more tip - consider whether your truck qualifies as a heavy vehicle (over 6,000 lbs GVWR) because you might be able to take a larger Section 179 deduction in the first year instead of spreading depreciation over several years. Just make sure your business use percentage stays above 50% to qualify.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

This is really helpful! I'm new to this whole vehicle depreciation thing and was getting confused by all the different rules. Just to clarify - when you say "excluding the W2 job miles" from your business calculation, does that mean those miles don't count toward your total annual mileage either? Or do they still count in the denominator when calculating the business use percentage? I want to make sure I'm tracking this correctly from the start.

0 coins

Consider looking into Captive Insurance Companies (CICs) if you own a business or have significant business income. Under Section 831(b), you can elect to have your captive taxed only on investment income, not insurance premiums, for captives with less than $2.3M in annual premiums. This allows you to deduct legitimate business insurance premiums paid to your own captive, while the captive accumulates wealth in a tax-advantaged structure. Another often-overlooked strategy is investing in Qualified Opportunity Zone funds, which allow you to defer capital gains taxes by investing those gains into designated economically distressed communities. You get a 10% step-up in basis after 5 years, 15% after 7 years, and if held for 10+ years, any appreciation in the QOZ investment itself is tax-free. For immediate tax relief, look into Cost Segregation studies if you own any commercial real estate or rental properties. This allows you to accelerate depreciation on certain components of buildings (like flooring, lighting, landscaping) from 27.5-39 years down to 5-15 years, creating significant upfront deductions. Finally, consider establishing a Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT) if you have highly appreciated assets. You get an immediate charitable deduction, avoid capital gains tax on the sale of the appreciated assets within the trust, and can receive income payments for life while ultimately benefiting charity.

0 coins

Aria Park

•

This is incredibly comprehensive - thank you! The Captive Insurance Company strategy is completely new to me. Is there a minimum business income threshold where CICs start to make sense, or specific types of businesses where they work best? I'm curious about the operational complexity too - do you essentially have to run a legitimate insurance operation, or can it be more passive? The Opportunity Zone concept sounds interesting but I'm wondering about liquidity concerns with the 10-year hold requirement. Have you seen good quality investment opportunities in these zones, or are most of them pretty speculative real estate plays? Also, regarding Cost Segregation studies - roughly what's the minimum property value where the study costs justify the tax benefits? I have one rental property worth about $300k but wasn't sure if it would be worth the expense of hiring specialists for the analysis.

0 coins

Aisha Patel

•

Great questions! For CICs, you typically need at least $500k-1M in annual business income to justify the setup and ongoing compliance costs. They work best for businesses with genuine insurable risks - professional services, manufacturing, real estate operations, etc. You do need to run it as a legitimate insurance company with proper reserves, claims handling, and risk distribution, though many use third-party managers to handle operations. For Opportunity Zones, you're right about liquidity concerns - it's definitely a long-term play. The quality varies widely. I've seen some solid multifamily housing developments and mixed-use projects in gentrifying areas, but also plenty of sketchy ground-up construction deals. The key is finding established sponsors with track records in the specific markets. Don't chase the tax benefits if the underlying investment doesn't make sense. On Cost Segregation, $300k is borderline but potentially worthwhile depending on the property type and your tax situation. Residential rental studies typically cost $3k-8k, so if you can accelerate $50k+ in depreciation from 27.5 years to 5-15 years, the first-year tax savings often justify the cost. Get quotes from a few firms - some will do a preliminary analysis to estimate benefits before you commit. All these strategies require good professional guidance. The tax code complexity means small mistakes can be expensive.

0 coins

One strategy that hasn't been mentioned yet is establishing a Solo 401(k) with a profit-sharing component if you have any 1099 income. Even small amounts of consulting or freelance work can open up significant additional retirement contribution space beyond your regular employer 401(k). Also consider tax-efficient withdrawal strategies from existing accounts. At your income level, you might benefit from Roth conversions during lower-income years (if you plan any sabbaticals, career transitions, or early retirement). Converting traditional IRA funds to Roth during a year when your income dips can be incredibly valuable long-term. Don't overlook state tax planning either - depending on where you live, strategies like establishing residency in a no-tax state before retirement or timing certain income recognition around state tax rules can save substantial amounts. Finally, if you're charitably inclined, consider a Donor Advised Fund (DAF). You can make a large contribution in a high-income year to get the deduction, then distribute the funds to charities over multiple years. It's more flexible than direct charitable giving and can help with the "bunching" strategy others mentioned. The key is working with a fee-only financial advisor who specializes in tax planning, not just someone who does basic tax prep. The strategies get much more sophisticated at your income level.

0 coins

This is really helpful perspective on the strategic timing aspects! I hadn't thought about using Roth conversions as a timing strategy during lower income years. That could be huge if I ever take a sabbatical or career break. The Donor Advised Fund suggestion is particularly interesting - I do give to charity but haven't been strategic about the timing for tax purposes. Quick question: is there a minimum amount that makes sense for setting up a DAF, or can you start with smaller contributions and build it up over time? Also, are there any fees or administrative costs I should factor in when comparing it to direct charitable giving? The state tax planning point is something I definitely need to research more. I'm in California now so the state tax burden is pretty significant. Have you seen people successfully establish residency in states like Texas or Florida while still working remotely for California-based companies? I imagine there are some complex rules around that.

0 coins

Prev1...599600601602603...5643Next