


Ask the community...
Be careful with in-person verification if your case involves multiple tax years or amended returns. I went in thinking it would be faster than phone calls, similar to how getting customer service at a bank branch is usually quicker than their call center. Instead, I ended up having to make three separate visits because the first representative didn't have access to my full file. It's like going to a doctor for a full physical but finding out they can only check your blood pressure that day. If your situation involves anything beyond the current tax year, call ahead to confirm they can handle your specific case type at that location.
Most experienced filers in this community generally recommend against in-person visits unless you've exhausted other options. The consensus seems to be that the IRS online transcript access, while not perfect, is sufficient for most verification needs. Phone verification is typically the next step, with in-person being a last resort for situations where identity verification is specifically required or where complex issues need resolution. Many have reported that the online transcript system updates are actually more current than what some in-person representatives can access, particularly during peak processing periods.
Filed February 1st. Got refund February 12th. No delays here. Used direct deposit. Kept return simple. No unusual credits. No schedule C. No rental income. Basic W-2 only. System works fine for uncomplicated returns. Media loves panic stories. Reality is more boring.
The IRS processing system operates on a multi-track basis, with different processing pipelines for different return types. Standard W-2 returns with no credits typically process in 7-14 days. Returns with refundable credits like EITC must wait at least until mid-February per the PATH Act and typically take 21-30 days. Returns with Schedule C, E, or F (business, rental, farm income) generally take 30-45 days. Returns flagged for manual review can take 60-120 days. This isn't new for 2024 - it's been this way for years. The confusion comes from people comparing their situation to others without understanding these different tracks.
This situation is actually more common than you'd think. Unlike the old stimulus payments, the current CTC system handles new dependents differently than existing ones. When I worked at a tax prep office, we saw this exact scenario dozens of times - direct deposit for established dependents, paper checks for newly added ones. The IRS does this as an anti-fraud measure. What's concerning is that if your ex incorrectly received the first payment, you might need to address that separately. The current payment likely only addresses your 2023 child, not correcting the misdirected payment for your older child.
Interesting anti-fraud measure! Makes sense when you think about it - harder to scam with paper checks that go to verified addresses. Kind of like how banks handle suspicious transactions by making you jump through extra hoops. šµļøāāļø
This happened to me exactly as described. I received $2,000 via direct deposit for my older child on March 24th, and then a paper check for exactly $1,500 for my new baby arrived April 2nd. The mail took exactly 5 business days from the scheduled mailing date. I was worried about the split payment too, but it all worked out correctly to the penny.
According to what I've seen on igotmyrefund.com and the r/IRS subreddit, your cycle ending in "04" means you're on a weekly processing schedule. The transcript update is definitely a good sign! Check the WMR tool again tomorrow morning - it usually updates overnight between Wednesday and Thursday for weekly cycles. The IRS2Go app sometimes updates even faster than the website.
I think I might be in a similar situation to yours... I had a small balance due but should still be getting something back. My transcript updated last week with almost the same pattern, and I'm cautiously optimistic that my refund might be coming soon. For me, it's going to help with some unexpected car repairs I've been putting off. Just hoping nothing else comes up to delay it further.
Mei Liu
This is similar to how construction permits work with lenders - they need official verification, not just proof of submission. For mortgage purposes, think of IRS amendments like this: submitting is step 1, but processing is step 2, and lenders almost always need step 2 completed. Unlike regular tax returns where e-file confirmation is often sufficient, amendments are treated with much more scrutiny by underwriters. If your timeline is tight, you might consider asking the lender if they'll accept a conditional approval with a post-closing condition related to the amendment, which is similar to how they handle other documentation sometimes. Every lender has different risk tolerance levels though, so what worked for one person might not work for another.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
You might possibly be able to use Form 9946 (IVES Request for Transcript of Tax Return) which could, in some circumstances, provide verification that might satisfy certain lenders. This form essentially allows a third party (usually your lender) to request your transcript directly. The benefit is that the transcript would potentially show the "received date" of your amendment, even if it hasn't been fully processed yet. I'd recommend asking your loan officer if they're familiar with this option, as it's somewhat less commonly used but could potentially resolve your situation without waiting for full processing.
0 coins