


Ask the community...
As someone who's been filing LLC taxes for 5 years now, here's the simple answer: your LLC is probably set up as a pass-through entity (the default) so all business income "passes through" to your personal return. You file Schedule C with your 1040. The $320 fee is just the tax software charging you for their business features. The actual tax amount difference is interesting though - with only $7k in profit, your tax bill shouldn't be that high. Make sure you're accounting for: 1) Self-employment tax (15.3% on your profit) 2) Any estimated tax payments you might have made 3) Proper deductions for business expenses
Thank you for this breakdown! I think I'm confused about the self-employment tax part. So even though my profit is below the standard deduction, I still have to pay the 15.3% on my $7k business income? That would explain a lot of the tax bill I'm seeing.
Yes, that's exactly right! This is the part that surprises many small business owners. The standard deduction ($12,950 for single filers in 2022, higher for 2023) only applies to income tax, not self-employment tax. Self-employment tax (which covers Social Security and Medicare) applies to net business income over $400, regardless of your other income or filing status. So with $7,000 in profit, you would owe self-employment tax on that amount (approximately $989 at the 15.3% rate) even if you owe zero income tax due to the standard deduction.
Have you considered filing as an S-Corp instead of a single-member LLC? Once your business starts making more money, it can save you a lot on self-employment taxes. You'd pay yourself a reasonable salary (which is subject to employment taxes) and then take the rest as a distribution (not subject to SE tax).
While S-Corp status can potentially save on self-employment taxes for higher-income businesses, it's generally not cost-effective at the $7-10k profit level the original poster mentioned. S-Corps require more administrative overhead, including: 1) Running payroll (with associated costs) 2) Filing separate corporate tax returns 3) Potentially higher tax preparation fees 4) More complex accounting requirements At lower income levels, the payroll costs and additional tax preparation fees often exceed any SE tax savings. Generally, S-Corp status becomes more beneficial when business profits reach $40k+ annually, depending on your specific situation.
One option nobody has mentioned yet is that many credit unions and community organizations offer free tax prep through VITA (Volunteer Income Tax Assistance) programs. The income limit for these is typically higher than the Free File programs - often around $60k for individuals or $120k for joint filers. Check with your local credit union, library, or community center. The volunteers are IRS-certified and it's completely free.
That's good to know about VITA! Unfortunately with my income at $78,500 I'd still be above the threshold you mentioned. Are there any other community programs with higher income limits?
You're right that at $78,500 you'd be above the standard VITA threshold. Some regions have expanded programs with higher limits, but they're not common. At your income level, your most cost-effective option is probably still using a budget tax preparer like FreeTaxUSA, TaxSlayer, or Cash App Taxes. Even though they're not free for you, they're much cheaper than the premium services and offer essentially the same functionality for most straightforward tax situations.
Has anyone tried Cash App Taxes? I heard they offer completely free federal AND state filing with no income limits. I'm nervous about using something linked to a payment app though.
I used Cash App Taxes (formerly Credit Karma Tax) last year and it worked fine for me. Completely free for both federal and state with no income restrictions. The interface isn't as polished as TurboTax but it gets the job done. Just make sure your tax situation isn't too complex - they don't support some more obscure forms and situations.
Quick tip from a tax preparer - keep ALL your closing documents, especially the settlement statement (sometimes called the HUD-1 or Closing Disclosure). It shows what you paid in points, property taxes, etc. You'll need those exact numbers when tax time comes. Also, if you paid mortgage insurance premiums (PMI), those aren't currently tax deductible but Congress sometimes retroactively extends that deduction, so keep those statements too.
Thanks for the tip! Should I be tracking home improvements too? I've heard some of them might be tax deductible but not sure which ones.
Absolutely track home improvements! While general home improvements aren't directly deductible, they add to your home's "basis" (essentially your cost of the home), which matters when you eventually sell to determine any taxable profit. Energy-efficient improvements are different - those can qualify for direct tax credits right now. This includes things like solar panels, energy-efficient windows, doors, insulation, heating/cooling systems, and water heaters. These credits can be substantial (up to 30% for solar), so definitely save those receipts!
Make sure you check your state's programs too! I totally missed out on a $2,000 credit our state offers for first-time buyers because I only researched federal stuff. Varies by state but worth looking into.
Another option is to check if your investment app integrates directly with tax software. I use one of the major tax prep programs, and it can automatically import all my trading activity directly from several brokerages. Saves tons of time and reduces the chance of errors.
Which tax software do you use? I usually just use the free online ones but I'm willing to pay for something if it'll make this process easier.
I use TurboTax Premier which is specifically designed for investors. It's not the cheapest option, but it directly imports from most brokerages and handles all the stock transactions automatically. H&R Block's Deluxe + State is another good option that's a bit less expensive and also has import capabilities for many investment platforms. If you want a free option, FreeTaxUSA can handle investments too, but you might need to enter summary information manually rather than direct importing.
Dont forget that if your trades were all done on the same platform, you might be able to use the composite method for reporting. Basically instead of listing each trade, you can group them by category (short-term vs long-term) and just report the totals. Check box 3 on Form 8949 if you're going this route.
This is actually not quite right. The composite method doesn't exempt you from reporting - the IRS still needs to be able to match what's on your 1099-B. What you're thinking of is summary reporting which is only available if all your basis was reported to the IRS (covered securities).
Jacinda Yu
One thing nobody's mentioned - if your alimony agreement was finalized AFTER 2019, alimony shouldn't be taxable income to you at all. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changed the rules. Only alimony under agreements finalized before 2019 is taxable to the recipient and deductible by the payer. Worth checking before you worry about constructive receipt.
0 coins
Hazel Garcia
ā¢Thanks for raising this point! My divorce was finalized in 2017, so I'm still under the old rules where alimony is taxable income to me and deductible for my ex. That's why I need to figure out the correct year to report it.
0 coins
Jacinda Yu
ā¢Got it! Since you're under the pre-2019 rules, then yes, constructive receipt applies and the experts above are correct - it's 2023 income for you since you received and deposited the check in 2023, regardless of when the funds became available. Just make sure your ex is also treating it as a 2023 payment on their return to avoid any IRS matching issues.
0 coins
Landon Flounder
For what it's worth, I'm a bookkeeper and we always use the date a check is received, not when it clears. Banks might have holding periods, but that doesn't change when the income is constructively received according to tax law. Your situation sounds straightforward - 2023 income.
0 coins
Callum Savage
ā¢But what if the bank hold was because of insufficient funds in the payer's account? That seems different from a standard hold.
0 coins