


Ask the community...
Another approach to consider: instead of using 529 funds for ALL your qualified expenses, you could pay some expenses out of pocket or with student loans, then use those expenses to claim education credits. For my daughter's education, we calculated the optimal mix: we used 529 funds for room and board (which qualify for tax-free 529 distributions but not for education credits), and then paid tuition with other funds so we could claim the AOTC. You need to carefully coordinate this since timing matters - the education expenses have to be paid in the same tax year you're claiming the credit.
Thanks for that strategy idea! How do you determine what the right split is between using 529 funds versus other money? Do you need to keep really detailed records to show which expenses were paid from which source?
The ideal split depends on maximizing your education credits. For the American Opportunity Credit, you need $4,000 in qualified expenses to get the full $2,500 credit. So I typically recommend paying at least $4,000 of tuition/fees from non-529 sources, then using 529 funds for remaining tuition and all room/board expenses. Yes, good record-keeping is essential! Keep copies of all tuition statements, receipts for books/supplies, and documentation showing which payment method was used for each expense. I create a simple spreadsheet each semester showing expense type, amount, date paid, and payment source. This has been extremely helpful during tax season and would be crucial documentation if ever audited.
My tax preparer actually advised AGAINST this strategy last year, telling me the IRS might flag it as suspicious. But after doing more research and talking with other tax professionals, I realized he was wrong. The key is proper documentation. I made sure to keep: - The 1098-T from my university - My 529 distribution statements - A written explanation of my election to treat part of the distribution as taxable - Calculations showing how much of the distribution was being treated as taxable I ended up saving over $1,800 by making $4,000 of my qualified expenses taxable so I could claim the AOTC. Remember that the AOTC is partially refundable (up to $1,000), which means you can get money back even if you don't owe any tax!
Here's exactly how to fix this in most tax software: 1. Find the section for capital gains / Schedule D 2. Look for Form 8949 adjustments or "adjust basis" 3. For the shares sold, enter adjustment code "B" 4. Calculate your adjustment amount: (FMV at exercise - original option price) Ć number of shares sold 5. Make sure the new adjusted basis matches FMV at exercise Ć shares sold This brings your cost basis up to the FMV at exercise, which is what you already paid ordinary income tax on (reported on your W-2). Without this adjustment, you're paying tax twice on the same income.
Thank you for these clear steps! Quick question - if my shares were sold at slightly different prices throughout the day (not all exactly at the FMV at exercise), does that change how I should calculate the adjustment?
No problem! If your shares were sold at slightly different prices throughout the day, that doesn't change how you calculate the basis adjustment. The adjustment is still (FMV at exercise - original option price) Ć number of shares sold. The selling prices will determine if you have any additional short-term capital gain or loss after the adjustment. For example, if FMV at exercise was $106.63, but some shares sold for $106.80 and others for $106.40, you'd have a small gain on some and small loss on others. But the basis adjustment calculation is the same regardless of the actual sale prices.
I have a slightly different situation - I exercised my NQSOs last year but held onto the shares instead of selling. Will I still need to make adjustments to my cost basis when I eventually sell? My broker is showing the original grant price as my basis.
Yes, you'll absolutely need to make the same type of adjustment when you eventually sell. The key is that when you exercised the options, you already paid ordinary income tax on the spread between your grant price and the FMV on exercise date. That spread was included in your W-2 income for the year you exercised. Your new cost basis becomes the FMV on the date you exercised, not the original grant price. When your broker issues a 1099-B after you sell, they'll likely show the original grant price as your basis, so you'll need to make that same Form 8949 adjustment to avoid being taxed twice on the same income. Keep good records of your exercise date and the FMV on that date!
One resource nobody's mentioned yet is the IRS's own Cumulative Bulletin and Internal Revenue Bulletins. They publish revenue rulings, procedures, and announcements that often clarify the code and regs. You can find them free on irs.gov by searching "IRB" and the relevant year. Also, for tax court cases, don't sleep on Google Scholar. Just go to scholar.google.com, select "Case law" instead of articles, and search terms plus "tax court". It's surprisingly comprehensive and totally free. My personal workflow is: 1. IRS pubs for overview 2. Cornell Law for code sections 3. Google Scholar for cases 4. Revenue Rulings/Procedures for IRS interpretations
This is super helpful, especially the Google Scholar tip! I hadn't thought of using that for tax research. Do you find the search results are accurate or do you get a lot of unrelated cases to sort through?
Google Scholar works surprisingly well if you use specific terms. For instance, instead of searching "business expenses tax court," try "ordinary and necessary 162(a) tax court" to get more relevant results. You'll still get some unrelated cases, but far fewer than a general search. I usually add the specific code section in my search along with any technical tax terms. If you're looking for cases on a particular issue, adding terms like "held that" or "we conclude" can help find cases where the court actually made a ruling on your issue rather than just mentioning it in passing.
Is anyone using Westlaw or LexisNexis for tax research? My friend has access through his job and says they're the best for finding relevant cases, but they're crazy expensive for individuals. Wondering if they're worth trying to get access to somehow.
Westlaw and LexisNexis are industry standards for a reason - they have excellent search capabilities and organizing features. But they're prohibitively expensive for most individuals unless you have access through work or school.
I just want to add that my dad went through something similar with a GoFundMe after his house burned down. His accountant told him to keep VERY detailed records of: 1) The total amount received from crowdfunding 2) All expenses paid using those funds 3) What category each expense falls into (medical, housing, etc) The accountant said that while the funds themselves aren't taxable as income, having this documentation is essential if you're ever questioned about it. Keep screenshots of the crowdfunding campaign total and donor list if possible.
Thank you for this practical advice. I've been saving receipts but I hadn't thought about organizing them by category or keeping screenshots of the campaign itself. Did your dad's accountant recommend any specific way to document that the expenses were paid specifically from the crowdfunding money versus regular income? Should I have set up a separate bank account just for these funds?
My dad actually didn't set up a separate account, and his accountant said that was his biggest mistake. She strongly recommended having a dedicated account for crowdfunding money to create a clear paper trail. It doesn't have to be anything fancy - even just a free checking account where you deposit all the crowdfunding money. That way, if you're ever audited, you can clearly show the money coming in from crowdfunding and then going out for qualified expenses. Without that separation, it gets really muddy trying to prove which dollars went to which expenses. If possible, I'd recommend transferring the funds to a separate account now and using that for all remaining expenses.
Has anyone here actually been audited specifically about crowdfunding money? I'm in a similar situation but for my husband's accident, and I'm getting conflicting advice from friends.
I wasn't audited for crowdfunding specifically, but I did get flagged for an audit the same year I received about $35k from a GiveForward campaign (similar to GoFundMe) for my son's medical treatment. When I showed the IRS agent my documentation proving it was a medical crowdfunding campaign, they immediately marked that portion as non-taxable and moved on to examining my other income. They didn't question it at all once they saw what it was.
Caleb Stone
I've been using a structure with a holding LLC (not C Corp) that owns several property LLCs for about 5 years now. Here's what I've learned: 1) Talk to a real estate tax specialist, not just a general CPA 2) The holding company approach simplifies banking and reporting a lot 3) C Corps rarely make sense for rental real estate due to double taxation and loss of preferential capital gains rates 4) Annual compliance costs increase with each entity, so factor that in 5) Some states have entity taxes or fees that make multiple LLCs expensive (looking at you, California) The biggest advantage I've found is simplified management while maintaining good liability segregation between properties.
0 coins
Noah Irving
ā¢Thanks for sharing your experience! So with your holding LLC structure, do you just file one partnership return for the holding LLC, or do you still need to file for each property LLC as well? I'm trying to understand the administrative burden.
0 coins
Caleb Stone
ā¢With my structure, I only file one partnership return (Form 1065) for the holding LLC. The individual property LLCs are treated as "disregarded entities" for federal tax purposes since they're single-member LLCs owned by the holding LLC. This significantly reduces tax preparation costs and paperwork. You'll still need to maintain separate books for each property for good management practices, but the tax filing burden is much lighter. Note that state requirements vary - some states may require separate filings or have annual fees for each LLC regardless of tax status. In my case, the administrative simplification at the federal level has been a big advantage.
0 coins
Daniel Price
Has anyone considered the implications of qualified business income (QBI) deduction (Section 199A) with these different structures? I'm currently trying to make sure whatever entity structure I choose maximizes my potential QBI deduction for my rental properties.
0 coins
Vanessa Chang
ā¢That's a really important consideration. For real estate investors, the QBI deduction can offer up to a 20% deduction on qualified business income. With pass-through entities (LLCs taxed as partnerships, S Corps, or disregarded entities), you generally preserve your ability to claim this deduction. C Corps aren't eligible for the QBI deduction, which is another reason they're often not ideal for real estate holdings. Also, if your income is above certain thresholds, having your properties in the right structure becomes even more important to maximize QBI benefits.
0 coins