Thanks for this info! That's really helpful. Would it be better to wait until March then? Or is mid-February generally safe enough? I'm trying to balance getting it done early vs avoiding problems.

Mid-February is typically safe enough in my experience. By then, the IRS has usually worked out most of the early filing season kinks. March is completely fine too if you're not in a rush. Anytime between mid-February and the April deadline should give you smooth processing. Just make sure if you're filing a protective return that your statement is very clear about your intentions and the legal basis for your position. That clarity is more important than the exact filing date.

Yes, attaching a PDF statement works fine! I did this last year. Just make sure you title it clearly like "Form 1120-F Protective Filing Statement" and reference it somewhere in the return itself if possible. The IRS does look at properly labeled attachments.

I was able to get documentation! But I had to be persistent and specific in my request. I emailed the bursar's office, financial aid, AND my department chair, explaining that I needed written confirmation that the Box 6 amount represented an internal transfer of funds and not additional scholarship money provided to me. After about 3 follow-ups, the university financial services director finally sent me a letter stating that the Box 6 amount was "an administrative adjustment representing internal fund transfers between university accounts that does not constitute additional funds disbursed to the student." I attached this to my tax return along with a brief statement explaining why I was only reporting the net scholarship amount.

Thank you! This is exactly what I needed to know. I'll draft a similar email today and start pressuring all three departments. I already tried just asking the bursar's office but they gave me a generic response that wasn't helpful at all. I'll be persistent and make sure to specifically request confirmation that it's an internal transfer, not additional scholarship money. Hopefully having something in writing will protect me if there are any questions about my return.

I had the same issue with TurboTax! What worked for me was entering the full amounts in both Box 5 and Box 6 as requested, but then going to the "Other Income" section and making a negative adjustment labeled as "1098-T Box 6 adjustment for internal fund transfer" to offset the double counting. This way the correct net amount gets reported. If you use another tax software, the process might be different, but the principle is the same - you need to make a manual adjustment somewhere to ensure you're only taxed on the net scholarship amount.

Do these ghost preparers ever get caught? Seems like they're scamming a lot of people and the IRS should be all over this.

Yes, the IRS does prosecute these preparers when they catch them, but it's challenging because many operate informally through social media and don't leave much of a paper trail. They often use temporary contact information, prepaid phones, and don't properly sign returns as preparers. The IRS has been conducting a nationwide crackdown on fraudulent preparers, with some high-profile prosecutions resulting in prison time and heavy fines. However, they can't catch everyone, which is why they focus on educating taxpayers about the risks. Remember, even if a preparer completes your return, YOU are legally responsible for all information on it and any resulting penalties.

That's true, but most people making $78K like OP wouldn't qualify for EITC, right? I think there's an income limit that's much lower.

Thanks for mentioning this. We actually don't have kids yet, so I'm not sure if we'd qualify for the EITC. And honestly, I don't think either of us updated our W-4s after getting married - I didn't even know that was a thing we needed to do. Would fixing that help us for this year's taxes or just for next year?

You can still qualify for EITC without children, though the amount is smaller. It depends on your income level - for 2023 taxes, married couples filing jointly with no qualifying children can get EITC if their income is below about $24,210. Regarding the W-4 adjustments, unfortunately that would only help you for future tax years, not for the return you've already filed. But you should definitely both submit new W-4 forms to your employers right away to prevent this problem next year. When both spouses work, you often need to withhold at a higher rate than single filers to account for your combined income pushing you into higher tax brackets. The IRS has a Tax Withholding Estimator tool on their website that can help you fill out your W-4 correctly.

This is generally bad advice for most people. MFS rarely results in tax savings and actually disqualifies you from several tax benefits like education credits, child care credits, and earned income credit. It's usually only beneficial in very specific situations like when one spouse has income-based student loan payments or massive medical expenses.

That's interesting! So are you saying the IRS doesn't strictly apply the $1,470 monthly limit that the SSA uses? My daughter has Down syndrome and occasionally works more hours for special events, but we still provide over 90% of her support.

That's right - while the IRS and SSA both use the term "substantial gainful activity," the IRS focuses more on the overall support situation rather than rigidly applying the monthly earnings limit. If you're providing 90% of your daughter's support, you're well within the requirements to claim her as a dependent. The key test for the IRS is whether you provide more than half of your dependent's total support for the year. The SGA question becomes more relevant if they're earning enough that they might be supporting themselves. Even with occasional higher earnings for special events, it sounds like your situation clearly meets the support test.

There are different SGA thresholds for blind individuals versus non-blind individuals with disabilities. In 2023, the threshold was $2,460 per month for blind individuals and $1,470 for non-blind. Doesn't matter what type of disability otherwise - physical, cognitive, etc all fall under the same threshold as long as they're not blind.