


Ask the community...
One important thing to remember with 1042-S forms - check if Box 7 is marked. If it is, that means tax was already withheld at the correct treaty rate and you might not need to file a return at all (depending on your total US income). Many international students end up filing unnecessarily when they don't have to. But if you had multiple income sources or any US source income not reported on a 1042-S, then you probably do need to file.
Is that true for all visa types though? I thought F-1 students always have to file even if they have no income, just to submit the 8843 form?
You're absolutely right about the 8843 form. I should have been more specific in my comment. All F-1 students must file Form 8843 regardless of whether they earned any income. This is just an informational form that establishes your status as a nonresident alien for tax purposes. However, if your only income was reported on a 1042-S with the correct treaty withholding (Box 7 marked), you might not need to file an actual tax return (1040NR) in addition to the 8843. But the 8843 is still required every year you're in the US on a student visa.
Has anyone used both Sprintax and GlacierTax? My school offers discounts for both but I can't decide which one to use for my 1042-S and W-2 forms. I'm wondering which one is more user-friendly for international students.
I've used both! Sprintax is more comprehensive and handles more complex situations better, especially if you have income from multiple states or need to file state returns. GlacierTax is simpler but doesn't handle some of the more unusual situations. For 1042-S forms specifically, I found Sprintax did a better job explaining what to do with them and which parts were taxable vs. non-taxable. But both will generate the final forms you need to mail in.
11 My two cents as someone who was in almost the exact same situation (9 years unfiled): The WORST thing that happened was losing out on about $7,000 in refunds from the years beyond the 3-year refund window. It still makes me sick thinking about it. Start with the most recent 3 years to secure those refunds, then work backward. The IRS was actually surprisingly helpful once I started the process. No jail, no asset seizure, no scary agents showing up at my door. Just a lot of paperwork and a bit of a learning curve.
18 Did you do it yourself or use a tax professional? I'm wondering if I should just use TurboTax for the back years or if that's a bad idea.
11 I started with a tax professional for the first year just to make sure I understood the process correctly, then did the remaining years myself using tax software. Most tax software can handle prior year returns, though you might need to purchase specific versions for each tax year. For simple W2 income situations, doing it yourself is definitely doable. If there's business income, rental properties, or other complex situations, a tax pro might be worth the money. The main thing is just getting started - the relief of having it done is worth every minute spent on the paperwork.
3 One thing nobody's mentioned - the mental health benefit of clearing this up! I had 6 years unfiled and the constant background anxiety was affecting every part of my life. After finally filing, it was like a 50-pound weight lifted off my shoulders. Even if your partner doesn't get all the refunds they could have, the peace of mind is PRICELESS.
15 This is so true. My wife had the same anxiety for years about unfiled taxes. She'd literally have panic attacks whenever tax season came around or when she saw IRS-related news. After we finally sorted it out, her general anxiety level dropped dramatically. The psychological burden of carrying that fear is way worse than the actual process of fixing it.
Just to add another perspective - I work as a volunteer tax preparer, and we see people miss out on EITC all the time, especially those without children. The income thresholds and rules can be confusing. Make sure your friend meets these requirements: - Income under the threshold (about $17,640 for single filers with no kids in 2025) - Age 25-64 (unless they're a specified student) - Not claimed as a dependent - Valid SSN - Investment income under $10,000 - US citizen or resident alien all year TurboTax should catch this, but sometimes people answer questions in ways that make the software think they don't qualify. Amending is definitely worth it!
Thanks for that breakdown! My friend definitely meets all those requirements. They're 28, made about $12k, have valid SSN, are a citizen, and have zero investment income. They aren't claimed as a dependent either. Do you know approximately how much EITC they might qualify for with that income level? Just trying to see if it's worth the effort for them to amend.
With an income of around $12k and no qualifying children, your friend would likely qualify for an EITC of approximately $500-600 for tax year 2024 (filing in 2025). The exact amount depends on their precise income and filing status. This is absolutely worth amending for! The amendment process isn't extremely difficult, and getting several hundred dollars back for filling out a form is a pretty good return on your time. Plus, if they qualify this year, they should make sure to claim it in future years too.
Something similar happened to me. The issue turned out to be that I accidentally checked the box saying I "could be claimed as a dependent" even though nobody actually claimed me. That one checkbox disqualified me from EITC. When I amended my return, it was pretty straightforward. Used Form 1040-X and included a corrected Schedule EIC. Got my additional refund in about 8 weeks. Your friend should definitely go for it!
Did you file the amended return yourself or use tax software? I'm trying to figure out the easiest way to help my mom with a similar issue from last year.
I'm a tax preparer (not CPA) and I see this ALL THE TIME with certain "tax professionals" in my area. They'll add fake Schedule C businesses, inflate charitable donations, or add dependents that don't exist. Please report this person to the IRS using Form 14157 (Complaint: Tax Return Preparer). The IRS takes preparer fraud very seriously! A legitimate increase from TurboTax would maybe be a few hundred dollars if you missed some deductions, but $2,600 from just a W-2 job is flat-out impossible without fraud.
Thanks for this info! Is there any chance I could get in trouble just for consulting with this preparer, even though I haven't filed with them yet? I didn't sign anything but I'm freaked out that my name might be associated with them now.
You're completely fine if you haven't signed or filed anything with them. Just consulting with a preparer doesn't create any liability for you. You only become responsible once you sign the return (either physically or by authorizing e-filing). I'd recommend keeping a record of your interaction with this preparer though - save any emails or documents they gave you, just in case you need them later. And definitely file that Form 14157 to report them. You're probably not the only person they're trying to scam, and many people don't realize it's fraud until the IRS comes after them years later.
Happened to my cousin! His shady "tax guy" claimed he had a home business and created like $15k in fake losses. Cousin got a massive refund, thought the guy was a genius. Two years later, IRS audit, had to pay back everything plus penalties. Dude STILL defends the tax preparer saying "the IRS just hates when people know the loopholes" š¤¦āāļø Some people never learn!
Luca Esposito
I work at an accounting firm and see CSF-1099R confusion all the time. When Box 2a is $0 but Code 7 is used, look at whether Box 2b is checked. If "Taxable amount not determined" is checked, the payer is basically saying "we don't know your tax basis, so we're putting $0 and you need to figure it out." You'll need to calculate how much of the distribution is actually taxable based on your contribution history. If you made after-tax contributions, those amounts come out tax-free. Keep in mind that earnings on those contributions are still taxable. Form 8606 is your friend here - use it to track non-deductible contributions and calculate the taxable portion.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
ā¢Thanks for this detailed explanation! So if Box 2b is checked (which it is), I need to look back at my contribution history? Is there an easy way to know if my contributions were pre-tax or after-tax? I honestly don't remember since I was at this job 8 years ago.
0 coins
Luca Esposito
ā¢Yes, if Box 2b is checked, you need to determine the taxable amount yourself. To know if your contributions were pre-tax or after-tax, check your old pay stubs if you have them - pre-tax contributions would have reduced your taxable wages at the time. Another way is to contact your former employer's benefits department - they should have records of whether your plan allowed after-tax contributions and if you made any. If you can't determine this, unfortunately the safest approach is to treat the distribution as fully taxable, though that may result in paying more tax than necessary.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
I just wanted to add - watch out for state tax implications too! I had a CSF-1099R with $0 in Box 2a, and while it was correct for federal purposes (after-tax contributions), my state didn't recognize the federal treatment. I had to add back some of it on my state return. The treatment varies by state, so check your state's rules specifically regarding pension and retirement distributions.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
ā¢This is such a good point! I messed up my state taxes last year because of this exact issue. My state required me to report the CSF-1099R differently than federal. Ended up having to file an amended state return.
0 coins