


Ask the community...
Another option to consider is changing your payment method entirely. If you're worried about the direct debit timing, you could cancel that (like others mentioned) and instead pay directly through IRS Direct Pay on their website. This gives you more control over exactly when the payment is processed since you initiate it manually.
Thanks for this suggestion! Would the IRS consider my taxes "paid on time" if I cancel the direct debit and then use Direct Pay on April 15th instead? I don't want to trigger any late payment penalties.
Yes, as long as you complete the Direct Pay transaction by midnight on April 15th, the IRS considers your payment made on time. The confirmation page you receive serves as proof of timely payment. Just make sure to select "2024" for the tax year and "1040 series" for the reason for payment when you use Direct Pay. Also, keep a copy of your payment confirmation number in case there are any questions later.
Just remember the IRS can be slow to process payments somtimes. Last year I made my payment on april 15 but it didnt actually come out of my account till april 17!! So don't cut it too close with funding your account - maybe try to get the money in there a few days early if possible?
Another key difference - cost! Tax lawyers typically charge $300-500/hour while CPAs are usually $150-350/hour. For routine tax prep and planning, a CPA is much more cost-effective. Save the lawyer for when you have actual legal tax problems.
Is it ever worth paying for both at the same time? Like could they work together on a complicated situation?
Absolutely! In complex situations, having both professionals work together can be extremely beneficial. For example, if you're creating a complex estate plan or setting up a business with significant tax implications, your CPA can provide the financial projections and tax calculations while your tax attorney ensures the legal structures are optimal. Many high-net-worth individuals and businesses have both a CPA and tax attorney on their professional team. They typically use the CPA for ongoing tax work and consult the attorney for specific legal tax matters. The cost is justified when the potential tax savings or risk mitigation significantly outweighs the professional fees.
A huge difference nobody mentioned is attorney-client privilege! If there's ANY chance you've done something the IRS might consider suspicious or fraudulent, DO NOT discuss it with a CPA. They can be forced to testify against you. Only communications with a tax attorney are protected by privilege.
This is so important! I learned this the hard way when my CPA had to provide information to the IRS during my audit. Nothing illegal, but certainly embarrassing and led to more scrutiny.
Just a heads up - make sure you're also accounting for state taxes on that early withdrawal if your state has income tax. The IRS calculator only handles federal taxes. I made that mistake last year and ended up owing a bunch to my state because I forgot the distribution was taxable at the state level too.
Does every state tax early withdrawals the same way though? I thought some states don't tax retirement distributions at all, while others follow the federal rules including the penalty?
You're absolutely right that states vary in how they handle retirement distributions. Some states like Wyoming, Florida, Texas, and others have no state income tax so there's nothing to worry about there. Other states follow the federal treatment and will tax the full amount as income, plus some even add their own early withdrawal penalties on top of the federal 10%. Then there are states with special exemptions or lower tax rates for retirement income, but these often don't apply to early withdrawals. For example, Illinois doesn't tax qualifying retirement income, but early withdrawals might not qualify for that exemption.
Quick question - I'm actually doing the opposite and trying to INCREASE my withholding because of an IRA withdrawal. If I enter it in the "other income" section of the calculator like everyone's suggesting, will it automatically recommend increasing my withholding from my paychecks to cover the additional tax from the distribution?
Yes, that's exactly what the calculator is designed to do! When you enter the IRA distribution in the "other income" section and include any withholding already taken from that distribution, the calculator will recommend adjusting your W-4 to withhold more from your remaining paychecks this year to cover the additional tax liability.
Something nobody's mentioned yet is the NIIT (Net Investment Income Tax) that kicks in at $200k single/$250k married. That's a real optimization point to consider since it adds 3.8% to investment income. Also, look at the standard deduction vs itemized deductions breakpoint - that can create an interesting optimization opportunity. Some people bunch their charitable donations every other year to itemize in those years while taking standard deduction in the off years.
That's a great point about the NIIT - totally forgot about that one! And the charitable donation bunching strategy is smart. Do you think it's worth trying to stay under the NIIT threshold even if it means taking a slightly lower salary?
For most people, higher income still wins out even with the NIIT, but it depends on your investment mix. If a large portion of your income is from investments, staying under the threshold could make sense. The charitable bunching strategy works really well if you're close to the itemization threshold. For example, if you normally donate $10k yearly but your total itemized deductions would be just under the standard deduction, you could donate $20k every other year, itemize in those years, and take the standard deduction in between.
Tbh there isnt really a perfect bracket bc the tax system is crazy complicated. But I found that right around 80-100k for a single person is pretty good. U can still get some education credits, retirement savers credit if ur at the lower end, and ur not hit with AMT or the investment taxes. My tax guy told me the worst spot is actually the super rich who make just enough to lose all deductions but not enough to hire fancy accountants for tax schemes lol. Like 500k-2mil range.
I've heard that too, the "happy middle" where you have enough to be comfortable but the tax code still throws you some bones. Makes me feel better about my "measly" 90k salary lol
Eloise Kendrick
19 I'm an accountant and see this question a lot. One thing nobody's mentioned yet is that if the roof replacement extended the useful life of the structure or improved it beyond its original condition (like upgrading to better materials or adding insulation), the IRS would almost certainly consider it a capital improvement requiring depreciation. Look into Form 3115 "Change in Accounting Method" if you've been incorrectly deducting capital improvements as repairs in previous years. Better to fix it proactively than wait for an audit.
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
ā¢21 Is there a minimum dollar threshold where the IRS doesn't really care? Like would they really make a big deal about a $9,800 repair vs. improvement on a rental property tax return? Seems like they'd be more concerned with bigger issues.
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
ā¢19 There's no specific dollar threshold where the IRS "doesn't care" - the rules apply regardless of amount. However, in practical terms, larger amounts are more likely to trigger scrutiny. The real issue isn't about the dollar amount but about following proper tax treatment. Even relatively small incorrect classifications, if discovered during an audit, can lead to adjustments, interest, and potentially penalties. More importantly, they could cause the IRS to expand the scope of their audit to look for other issues, which nobody wants.
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
22 Random question - did you tell your insurance company about the roof leak? I had a similar issue and didn't realize my homeowner's policy actually covered part of the repair cost, which changed the tax situation since I was only paying out of pocket for a portion of it.
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
ā¢24 This is a really good point! Insurance reimbursements can totally change how you report these expenses. Did you have to adjust your deduction based on the insurance payment?
0 coins