


Ask the community...
I work at a university bursar's office and can confirm this is a massive headache for students and for us too. The reporting requirements for 1098-T are confusing even for professionals. Most schools now use the "payments received" method (Box 1) rather than "amounts billed" (Box 2), which means we report tuition when we receive the payment, not when the classes occur. So yes, if you pay your Spring semester tuition in December, it goes on that year's 1098-T even though the classes are in the following year. Meanwhile, scholarships/grants have to be reported in the year they're applied, which is usually when classes start. This creates exactly the mismatch you're describing when students graduate. My advice: ALWAYS keep your payment receipts showing exactly when you paid tuition and when scholarships were applied. This documentation is crucial if you need to explain discrepancies between your actual educational expenses and what's reported on your 1098-T.
Is there any way to request that schools change how they report this? It seems fundamentally unfair that the reporting method can cause students to lose out on significant tax credits just because of when payments happen to be processed.
Unfortunately, schools don't have much flexibility here. The IRS mandates the reporting methods, and schools must follow them. Prior to 2018, schools could choose between reporting amounts billed or payments received, but now most are required to use the payments received method. What students can do is plan their payments strategically if possible. For example, if you know you're graduating in Spring, sometimes delaying that final tuition payment until January (of your graduation year) can help align the reporting with when you'll receive and use your education. However, this depends on your school's payment deadlines and late fee policies.
Has anyone tried using different tax software to deal with this issue? I tried H&R Block online and it kept forcing me to use the exact amounts from the 1098-T. When I tried to explain the timing difference, it wouldn't let me override the numbers.
I had the same problem with TurboTax! I ended up switching to FreeTaxUSA which let me enter my actual qualified education expenses separate from what was on the 1098-T. You have to include an explanation statement, but at least it allowed me to claim the full credits I was entitled to.
Thanks for the suggestion! I just tried FreeTaxUSA and it definitely gives more flexibility. It asks for what's on the 1098-T but then has separate entries for "actual qualified expenses paid" where you can enter the correct amounts. Much better approach than the other software I tried.
I work in accounting (not a CPA though) and can share some insight. Many companies require W-9s for ALL payments they make to individuals, regardless of whether they'll issue a 1099. It's just standard procedure for their accounting systems. Here's what's likely happening: The builder's accounts payable system won't let them cut a check without a vendor in their system, and they need a W-9 to set you up as a vendor. This doesn't automatically mean they'll issue you a 1099-MISC at the end of the year. That said, I'd include a clear note stating this is an expense reimbursement (not service payment) when you return the W-9, and maybe follow up with an email to their accounting department to ensure they code it properly in their system.
Thanks for the accounting perspective! Would it be worth asking them directly if they plan to issue a 1099 for this reimbursement? Or is there specific language I should use when I submit the W9 to make it clear this shouldn't be treated as income?
Yes, it would definitely be worth asking them directly if they plan to issue a 1099 for the reimbursement. A simple email saying "I'm submitting the W-9 as requested, but want to confirm you won't be issuing a 1099 for this payment since it's a reimbursement for expenses I incurred due to construction issues, not income" should do the trick. As for specific language when submitting the W-9, I'd attach a brief cover letter stating: "This W-9 is being provided solely for your vendor setup requirements. The $750 payment represents reimbursement for mold testing expenses I incurred as a result of construction defects, not payment for services or taxable income. Please ensure this is properly coded in your accounting system as an expense reimbursement to prevent incorrect 1099 reporting." That clearly documents your position if there are any questions later.
Wouldn't it be easier to just not give your SSN and instead just call it a reimbursement? If you give them your w9 your gonna have to deal with the 1099 and the whole back and forth with the IRS. Seems like more trouble than its worth for $600.
Has anyone tried FreeTaxUSA Pro? Their commercial version is only like $85 for unlimited federal returns. Not as fancy as Drake or ProSeries but it might be perfect for a student.
Just throwing this out there - make sure you understand the legal implications of preparing taxes for others, even if they're friends and family. Technically, you should register for a PTIN (Preparer Tax Identification Number) from the IRS if you're preparing returns for compensation, even if it's just a small amount.
Good point! I wasn't planning to charge anything since I'm just getting experience, but I'll look into getting a PTIN anyway to do things properly.
Does anyone know if the expanded Line 1 for wages will affect how we report income from gig work? I drive for Uber and do DoorDash, and I'm never sure if that should go on Line 1 or Schedule C. With these changes, would that fall under "Line 1h: Other earned income"?
Your gig work from Uber and DoorDash shouldn't go on Line 1h. That income is considered self-employment income and should continue to be reported on Schedule C. The "Other earned income" on Line 1h is generally for earnings that are treated as wages but don't fit in the other categories. As a self-employed gig worker, you'll still report your income and expenses on Schedule C, calculate your net profit or loss, and then that flows to Schedule 1 and ultimately to Form 1040. These changes to Line 1 don't change the fundamental way gig workers report their income.
Will tax software be ready for these changes? I always use TurboTax but I'm worried these new form lines will cause problems, especially with all my crypto transactions from 2022.
Tax software companies update their programs every year based on IRS changes. TurboTax, H&R Block, and other major tax software should have all the new form changes implemented before filing season begins. They usually start updating their systems as soon as the IRS finalizes the forms.
AstroAce
Quick tip for anyone dealing with this: I've found that using QuickBooks to track payments to contractors makes this way easier. It lets you record the full payment amount but also track the processing fees separately. At tax time, everything is already categorized correctly for your Schedule C.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
ā¢Does this work with the basic version of QuickBooks or do I need the higher tier plans? I've been considering switching from my spreadsheet system but don't want to pay for features I won't use.
0 coins
AstroAce
ā¢The basic QuickBooks Self-Employed version does have this functionality, though it's somewhat limited. The QuickBooks Simple Start plan works better if you have multiple contractors since it gives you more detailed reports and tracking options. If you're just tracking a few contractors, the Self-Employed version should be sufficient. But if you have numerous contractors or need more comprehensive reporting for your business, the higher tier plans definitely make things easier with features like automatic 1099 preparation and filing.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
Maybe I'm overthinking this but I still don't understand how this all works out correctly. If I issue a 1099 for $1350 but my contractor only received $1309, doesn't that mean the IRS thinks they got $41 more than they actually did? Won't they be taxed on money they never received??
0 coins
Zara Mirza
ā¢Not exactly. The contractor records the full $1350 as gross income (matching the 1099), but then they get to deduct the $41 PayPal fee as a business expense on their Schedule C. This reduces their net income to $1309, which is what they'll actually be taxed on.
0 coins