


Ask the community...
Everyone's focusing on the Simple IRA rules, but have you considered making an additional contribution directly to a Traditional or Roth IRA? The contribution limits are separate from your Simple IRA, and you have until the tax filing deadline (April 15, 2024) to make contributions for the 2023 tax year. For 2023, you can contribute up to $6,500 ($7,500 if you're 50 or older) to a Traditional or Roth IRA, subject to income limitations. This might be a good way to save more for retirement even if you can't maximize your Simple IRA for 2023.
I didn't even think about that! Do you know if I can have both a Simple IRA through my employer AND contribute to a separate Traditional IRA? Is there any impact to the deductibility of Traditional IRA contributions if you also have a workplace retirement plan?
You can definitely have both a Simple IRA and a Traditional or Roth IRA. However, being covered by a workplace retirement plan (like your Simple IRA) does affect the deductibility of Traditional IRA contributions based on your income. For 2023, if you're covered by a workplace plan, the deduction for Traditional IRA contributions starts to phase out at $73,000 for single filers and $116,000 for married filing jointly. If your income is above those thresholds, you might want to consider a Roth IRA instead (which has its own income limits) or a non-deductible Traditional IRA contribution that could potentially be converted to a Roth later (the "backdoor Roth" strategy).
Just wondering - has anyone tried calling their payroll dept and asking them to process the final paycheck of the year earlier? My company does this some years. They'll run the Dec 31 payroll a few days early to make sure everyone gets paid before the year ends, which helps with retirement contributions counting for the current year.
My company does this too! We specifically asked about it a few years ago because several employees wanted to max out their retirement contributions, and now they just automatically process the last paycheck of the year earlier. It might be worth asking - the worst they can say is no.
That's a great idea! I just called my payroll department and asked about this. They said they normally don't change their schedule, but since there are several employees in my situation, they're going to bring it up with management to possibly process the final 2023 payroll on December 29th instead of waiting until January. Fingers crossed this works out - thanks for the suggestion!
Just to add another perspective - I've been an expat for 15 years and have taken the housing exclusion on Form 2555 every year. In my experience, utility documentation has never been an issue, even during an audit I had back in 2017. For utilities specifically, the IRS auditor accepted my bank statements showing payments to utility companies along with a simple spreadsheet breaking down estimated costs. What they really cared about was that my housing wasn't "lavish" - they wanted proof my rent was appropriate for my location and job level. When I didn't have some documentation during my audit, they allowed me to provide reasonable estimates with an explanation of how I arrived at those numbers. Just be honest, keep your estimates realistic, and you should be fine.
Did they convert all your foreign currency amounts or did you have to do that yourself? And did you get asked for any kind of proof of the exchange rates you used?
I did the currency conversions myself using yearly average exchange rates from the Treasury Department's website. The auditor didn't ask for proof of the exchange rates I used, but I had included a note in my file explaining which conversion method I was using and why. If you're dealing with significant currency fluctuations, you might want to use monthly average rates instead of yearly, especially if that works in your favor. The key is being consistent and having a reasonable explanation for your method. They didn't scrutinize the actual conversion calculations much - they were more concerned with verifying the base expenses were legitimate.
I messed up my Form 2555 last year by overthinking the utility documentation issue. I was missing bills for 3 months, so I didn't claim anything for those months. My tax preparer later told me I should have just made reasonable estimates based on the 9 months I did have documentation for. If you're missing some utility bills, one approach is to average the bills you do have and apply that average to the missing months. Just make a note somewhere in your records explaining your methodology. The housing exclusion can make a big difference in your tax liability, so don't leave money on the table just because your documentation isn't perfect. As others have said, reasonable estimates are allowed.
Here's a little tax planning tip that helped me with my staking rewards: You can time your selling strategy based on your income levels each year. In years where your income is lower, you might want to sell some appreciated crypto since you'd be in a lower tax bracket. Similarly, if you have crypto that's decreased in value since receiving it as staking rewards, selling in a high-income year can help offset other gains or up to $3k of ordinary income. I've been staking for 3+ years now and this strategy has saved me thousands in taxes. Just make sure you're keeping meticulous records of when you received each reward and what the fair market value was at that time.
Makes sense in theory, but isn't it a nightmare to track all those tiny staking deposits? I get rewards like every day or week depending on the platform. How do you possibly keep track of the cost basis for each one?
It would be an absolute nightmare to track manually, which is why I use specialized crypto tax software. It connects to your wallets and exchanges through APIs and automatically grabs all transactions, including those tiny daily or weekly staking rewards. Each reward is recorded with its fair market value at the time of receipt, establishing your cost basis. When you sell, the software can use methods like FIFO (First In, First Out) or specific identification to determine which batch of crypto you're selling and calculate the appropriate gain or loss. Worth every penny come tax season.
Could someone please explain how the taxation works if I'm getting rewards in a different token than what I'm staking? Like staking ETH but getting rewards in another token? Do the same rules apply?
Yes, the same general principles apply. When you receive rewards in a different token, you'll be taxed on the fair market value of the rewards token at the time you receive it. This creates your cost basis for the rewards token. If you later sell that rewards token, you'll pay capital gains tax on any appreciation since you received it. The original staked ETH isn't directly part of this tax calculation (though of course it has its own separate cost basis and potential capital gains when you eventually unstake and sell it).
Theatre professor here - this is actually something we discuss in our Professional Development course. The key distinction is whether you have income from acting that you're reporting. If you're just a student with no income from acting, these are personal expenses. But if you're earning money from acting (even small gigs), and reporting that income on Schedule C, then a portion of these services can be justified as professional research. Pro tip: Start keeping a viewing log now. Note which shows/films you watched specifically for professional development, what you studied (acting techniques, dialects, etc.), and how it relates to your professional goals. This documentation is essential if you're ever questioned about these deductions.
Is there a specific format you recommend for this viewing log? Should it be detailed or just basic info like date, title, and purpose? I'm trying to get better about documentation but don't want to overcomplicate things.
Nothing fancy needed! A simple spreadsheet or even a note on your phone works well. Include: 1) Date watched, 2) Title, 3) Platform (Netflix, theater, etc.), 4) Brief purpose (e.g., "Studied accent work for upcoming role" or "Researched period movement for 1920s play"), and 5) Approximate time spent. This doesn't need to be elaborate - just enough to show the IRS that you're tracking business versus personal use. Most of my professional actor friends spend about 5-10 minutes per week updating their viewing logs. The key is consistency rather than extensive detail.
I tried deducting streaming services during college when I had some acting income and got audited! The IRS agent told me that you need to be very careful about how you claim these. Here's what I learned: 1. You absolutely NEED income from acting to claim these deductions 2. You should only deduct the percentage used for professional research 3. You need documentation showing which specific shows/films were watched for professional purposes I ended up having to pay back the deductions plus a small penalty because I claimed 100% of my streaming services without proper documentation. Don't make my mistake!
Lauren Wood
One strategy I used was buying a vehicle that's over 6,000 pounds GVWR but under the 14,000 pound limit. My accountant suggested this because you can still claim the full Section 179 deduction (up to the annual limit, which is $1,050,000 for 2023) but you need to make sure it's a qualifying vehicle. Some popular options are certain Ford F-150 models, Chevy Tahoes, and some larger SUVs. But make sure you get the exact GVWR from the manufacturer because some trims of the same model might qualify while others don't.
0 coins
Ellie Lopez
ā¢Does anyone know if minivans like the Toyota Sienna or Honda Odyssey qualify? They have tons of cargo space but I'm not sure about the weight requirements.
0 coins
Lauren Wood
ā¢Most minivans don't qualify for the heavy vehicle Section 179 deduction because they typically have a GVWR under 6,000 pounds. The Toyota Sienna has a GVWR around 5,500-5,600 pounds, and the Honda Odyssey is similar. You need to look for vehicles specifically marketed as trucks or SUVs with a GVWR over 6,000 pounds. Even then, make sure the vehicle is primarily used for business (>50%) and keep detailed mileage logs. Also, the business usage percentage in the first year determines how much of the purchase price you can deduct under Section 179.
0 coins
Chad Winthrope
Has anyone considered the SUV loophole limitation? Even with vehicles over 6,000 GVWR, there's a cap on how much you can expense in year 1 (around $27,000 for SUVs last I checked). The full $1 million+ Section 179 limit only applies to certain types of equipment or larger vehicles (>14,000 pounds).
0 coins
Paige Cantoni
ā¢The 2023 limit for SUVs is $28,900, but you can still take bonus depreciation on the remaining amount, so you might still be able to deduct most of the purchase price in year 1 depending on your situation.
0 coins