


Ask the community...
One thing nobody mentioned yet - if you were married for part of the year, you might also qualify for married filing jointly IF your ex is willing to file together. This sometimes results in a better tax situation for both people, even after divorce. But obviously this depends on if you're on good terms and both agree it makes financial sense.
Thanks for mentioning this! My ex and I are actually on decent terms. Would we both have to file jointly together or could I still do head of household? I've already submitted my return as head of household based on the advice here...would I need to do an amendment if joint was better?
If you file jointly, both of you have to file together on one return. You can't have one person filing jointly and the other filing head of household - it's an all or nothing choice. Since you've already filed as head of household, you could amend if filing jointly would benefit both of you. However, you'd need to run the numbers both ways to see which is better, and your ex would need to agree. Remember that filing jointly also means you're both responsible for the entire tax liability, so there's some risk involved if you don't completely trust each other.
Does anyone know if FreeTaxUSA handles this situation well? I'm going through a divorce right now (not final yet) and was gonna use FreeTaxUSA but now I'm worried it might get confusing with the filing status questions.
FreeTaxUSA actually handles this pretty well! I used it last year after my divorce. They ask straightforward questions about your marital status as of Dec 31, whether you have dependents, etc. and guide you to the right filing status. Their help sections explain the requirements clearly too.
I would recommend you double check with a professional if your situation is complicated. My sister used FreeTaxUSA after her divorce and it seemed fine but she missed some deductions related to the kids that her accountant caught the following year.
OP, I think your situation definitely calls for a professional, but don't go back to H&R Block. They're overpriced for what they offer. Find an actual CPA who specializes in individual taxes. The stock sales alone make this worthwhile - especially if they were RSUs or options from your employer, which have special tax treatment. When I was in a similar situation (moved states, had stock sales), I missed some deductions doing it myself that cost me thousands. The next year I used a CPA who found errors in my previous return and helped me file an amendment that got most of that money back. The $500 I paid was totally worth it.
Thanks for this perspective! I definitely won't go back to H&R Block after that experience. Do you have any tips on finding a good CPA who knows how to handle these interstate moves and stock issues? Is there anything specific I should look for or ask when I'm interviewing them?
Look for a CPA who specializes in individual taxes rather than business taxes. Ask specifically about their experience with interstate moves and stock compensation (RSUs, options, etc). A good question is "how would you handle allocation of income between California and Oregon for a mid-year move?" Also ask about their approach to organizing those old 401ks - a good tax professional thinks beyond just this year's return. Check Google reviews, but also ask for referrals from colleagues in similar situations. Since you work for a large company, there might be others who've dealt with the same stock and relocation issues who can recommend someone.
Anyone have recommendations for tax software if OP decides not to use a CPA? I had a somewhat similar situation (moved states, sold stock) but used FreeTaxUSA instead of TurboTax and saved a bunch of money while still getting all the forms I needed.
I'll second FreeTaxUSA. It handled my interstate move and stock sales for $15 (for the state return). Federal filing is completely free regardless of complexity. TurboTax would have charged me $120+ for the same forms.
Just to add something important - if your in-laws were primarily living on Social Security and VA benefits, there's a good chance they weren't required to file at all. Many people don't realize this. For example, in 2022, a married couple over 65 only needed to file if their gross income exceeded $28,700. Social Security is often not counted in this calculation unless they had other substantial income. VA benefits are generally tax-free. Before you panic about years of unfiled returns, find out if they were even required to file. This could be much simpler than you think!
Thank you for mentioning this! I had no idea there were income thresholds where filing wasn't required. That makes me feel a bit better about the situation. Their mobile home was probably worth about $25,000 and they had no other major assets. Do you know if the IRS can tell us whether they were required to file for those years?
Yes, the IRS can absolutely help determine if they were required to file. When you contact them (either directly or through a service like others mentioned), ask specifically for "wage and income transcripts" for the years in question. These will show all income reported to the IRS under their Social Security numbers. The value of their mobile home actually doesn't factor into the filing requirement - it's based on income, not assets. Given what you've described, it sounds very possible they weren't required to file. The 1041-ES forms you received are likely related to the estate itself, not their personal unfiled returns, which is a separate matter that the IRS can clarify when you speak with them.
One thing nobody's mentioned - you should check if the estate itself needs to file a return. Form 1041-ES is for estimated tax payments for estates and trusts. If the estate generated income after your in-laws passed (like interest on accounts, sale of assets, etc.), the estate might need to file its own return separate from your in-laws' personal returns. Usually this only applies if the estate earned more than $600 in income before assets were distributed to heirs. Did the estate have any income-generating assets that weren't immediately distributed?
This is important! My mom's estate had a CD that generated $700 in interest during probate, and we had to file a 1041 for the estate even though she wasn't required to file personal returns for years before her death.
Thank you for bringing this up! There was a small checking account with maybe $3,000 that earned some interest, and a life insurance policy that paid out about $15,000. Would the life insurance payout count as estate income? We distributed everything pretty quickly after getting the insurance money, probably within 2-3 months.
Something that hasn't been mentioned yet - if you're staking through a DeFi protocol rather than a centralized exchange, the record-keeping gets WAY more complicated. I had to figure this out for my Curve and Aave staking. For DeFi staking, you'll need to track: 1. Initial deposit 2. Each reward distribution (and USD value at that moment) 3. Any compounding/restaking 4. Final withdrawal Make sure you're noting which blockchain everything happened on too, especially if you're staking across multiple chains.
Do you have any tips for tracking DeFi staking rewards if you were, hypothetically, completely disorganized and didn't track anything all year? Asking for a friend... š¬
If your "friend" hasn't been tracking anything, there are a few options! First, check if the DeFi protocols you're using have any dashboard that shows historical rewards - some newer ones do offer this. For most cases though, you'll need to use a blockchain explorer like Etherscan, Solscan, etc. Look up your wallet address and filter for the contract addresses of the staking protocols you used. You'll need to go through the transactions and identify the rewards. It's tedious but possible. Some tax tools can also retroactively analyze your on-chain activity and categorize staking rewards automatically. Worth the investment if you have significant DeFi activity, especially across multiple chains or protocols.
One more thing I didn't see mentioned - staking rewards may also be subject to self-employment tax if you're considered to be in the "trade or business" of crypto staking. This typically happens if your staking operation is substantial, involves significant time/effort, and you're actively managing it as a business activity. For most casual stakers with a few validators, ordinary income treatment (without SE tax) is appropriate. But if you're running a serious node operation and staking is your primary income source, you might need to consider SE taxes too.
Sasha Reese
Something else to consider - if you only formed the S Corp in mid/late 2021, you might have income from early 2021 that was legitimately earned as a sole proprietor before the S Corp was formed. You need to make sure you're distinguishing between pre-S Corp income (which would go on Schedule C) and S Corp income (Form 1120-S). Also, if you didn't make a formal S Corp election with Form 2553, you might actually be a C Corp by default, which would be a whole different tax situation. Do you remember filing Form 2553?
0 coins
Kiara Greene
ā¢That's a really good point. I started contracting around April 2021 and didn't form the S Corp until September. So I definitely had some income before the corporation existed. And yes, I'm pretty sure I filed the 2553 - the bookkeeper handled that paperwork and I signed it. I got something back from the IRS confirming the S election but I'd have to dig through my files to find it.
0 coins
Sasha Reese
ā¢That's good you filed Form 2553 and have confirmation. Your approach should be to file two different types of returns for 2021 then: For January-August 2021, report your contracting income on Schedule C as a sole proprietor. This will be part of your personal 1040. For September-December 2021, file an 1120-S for your S Corporation. You'll need to report any reasonable salary you should have taken (even if you didn't actually run payroll) and any distributions you took from the business.
0 coins
Muhammad Hobbs
Jumping in to add another perspective - I went through something similar last year and learned that operating as an S Corp without proper salary payments can be a red flag. The IRS looks specifically for S Corps that don't pay reasonable salaries to owners to avoid payroll taxes. If you decide to keep the S Corp status and file 1120-S forms for those years, make sure you work with a tax pro to determine a reasonable salary amount. You might need to file amended payroll tax returns too.
0 coins
Noland Curtis
ā¢I use TurboTax Business for my S Corp. Would that work for someone in OP's situation or is this too complex for DIY software?
0 coins