


Ask the community...
Don't forget about state taxes too! Depending on which state you live in, you might need to report that Belgian rental income on your state return as well. Some states have different rules for foreign income than federal. I learned this the hard way with my rental property in Mexico. I reported everything correctly on my federal return but didn't realize California wanted their cut too. Got a nasty surprise assessment letter the following year.
Oh no, I hadn't even thought about state taxes! We're in New York - do you know if they follow the federal rules for foreign income or have their own system? This is getting more complicated by the minute.
New York generally follows federal rules for income inclusion, so if you're reporting the rental income on your federal Schedule E, you'll need to include it on your NY return too. The one benefit is that NY does allow credits for foreign taxes paid, similar to the federal system. Some states like Nevada or Florida might be more advantageous for people with significant foreign income since they don't have state income tax. But for now, plan on reporting that Belgian rental income on both federal and NY returns.
Has anyone mentioned Form 8833? If you're planning to take a position based on the US-Belgium tax treaty, you might need to file this form to disclose your treaty-based position. I had to do this with my rental properties in France.
I've had this exact problem! My solution was simple - I filed my taxes electronically using my correct legal name (as in the IRS system), reported the 1099-K income accurately, and in the notes section, I explained the name discrepancy. My return was accepted without issues. The IRS did send me a letter about 6 weeks later asking me to verify the income was mine, and I just had to respond confirming it was. No penalties, no rejections, just a little extra paperwork. Don't stress too much!
Where is this "notes section" you mentioned? Is that something in TurboTax or the actual IRS forms? I'm having a similar issue and want to make sure I do this right.
Sorry, I should have been more clear! In most tax software (I used TaxAct), there's a section where you can add miscellaneous information or notes when you're entering 1099 information. In the actual IRS forms, you can attach a statement labeled "Form 1099-K Name Discrepancy Explanation" that briefly explains the situation. If you're using TurboTax, look for the section where you enter your 1099-K information - there should be an option for "Notes" or "Add Additional Information." If you don't see it, you can always create a separate document explaining the discrepancy and attach it to your return as a PDF if filing electronically, or as a physical attachment if filing by mail.
I work at a tax prep office and see this all the time. The people saying SSN is more important than the name match are correct. We file returns with name mismatches regularly and they're accepted. BUT - and this is important - you might get a CP2000 letter later asking you to verify the income. It's not an audit, just a verification step. Respond promptly and it's no big deal. The company should correct it, but realistically, if they won't, you're still OK to file with the mismatch.
Thanks for the inside info! So the rejection thing the IRS person told OP was just to scare them? I've been worried because my PayPal 1099-K has my username not my legal name lol
The IRS agent was being overly dramatic. The system won't automatically reject an e-filed return just because of a name mismatch on a 1099-K when the SSN matches. What likely happens is they were trying to motivate you to get it corrected because it makes their matching process easier. For your PayPal situation, that's super common! As long as your SSN is correct on the 1099-K, you should file using your legal name. The IRS matching program will flag it, but then verify the SSN and process it. You might get that CP2000 letter I mentioned asking you to confirm it's your income, but just respond promptly and you'll be fine.
Make sure you understand the income limits for Form 8880. For 2022, if you're single, your AGI needs to be $34,000 or less for any credit, and the credit percentage changes based on your income level. At $43k, you might be above the limit depending on your filing status. If you're married filing jointly, the limit is higher ($68,000), so that could change things. The form itself isn't that complicated once you understand what it's asking for - basically your retirement contributions and any distributions that might reduce your qualified contributions.
I'm filing as Head of Household, not single - does that change the income limits for Form 8880? And do employer matches count toward the contribution amount for the credit, or just what I put in myself?
For Head of Household, the income limit for Form 8880 is $51,000 for 2022, so at $43k you should still qualify for at least a partial credit. The credit rate would be 10% of your qualified retirement contributions. Only your contributions count toward the credit, not your employer match. So if you contributed 5% of your salary, only that amount qualifies for the Saver's Credit. The employer match is great for your retirement savings but doesn't factor into this particular credit calculation.
Anyone know if TaxAct automatically calculates the correct credit once you fill in Form 8880? I've had issues with it miscalculating credits before.
I used TaxAct last year for my Saver's Credit and it calculated everything correctly. Just make sure you enter your contributions accurately and answer all the questions. The software should handle the income phaseouts and percentages correctly.
Something else to consider - when you transfer your crypto to Robinhood, that's not a taxable event (it's just moving your property). But the moment you sell on Robinhood, that's when the taxable event occurs. Also, Robinhood's tax forms will show the proceeds from your sale but won't have your cost basis information for crypto transferred in. They'll likely issue a 1099-B with your proceeds, but the cost basis section might be blank or listed as "unknown," which puts the responsibility on you to report the correct cost basis on your tax return. If you significantly underreport your cost basis, that's where audit flags might come up since the IRS will see a mismatch between your reported gain and what they'd calculate based on zero cost basis.
Thanks, this is super helpful. So if I understand correctly - transferring to Robinhood isn't taxable, but I need to make sure I have documentation ready for my cost basis when I do sell, since Robinhood won't have that info? Would it make more sense to sell on my current exchanges where at least some transaction history exists, rather than moving to Robinhood first?
That's exactly right - transferring isn't taxable, but you need to document your cost basis for when you do sell, since Robinhood won't have that information. As for whether to sell on current exchanges versus transferring to Robinhood first, that's a great question. There's a potential advantage to selling on exchanges where you have some transaction history, as you could potentially have more documentation to support your reported cost basis. However, if those are foreign exchanges, they might not issue U.S. tax forms, which could create other complications. If your current exchanges can provide transaction history reports that show your purchases, that documentation could be valuable regardless of where you ultimately sell. The key is having a defensible way to calculate and document your gains.
Don't overlook the fact that if you've been trading crypto while a permanent resident but before becoming a citizen, you still have US tax liability on those gains. The US taxes residents on worldwide income. Also, be aware that transferring between cryptocurrencies (like trading Bitcoin for Ethereum) counts as a taxable event too - each swap is technically a sale of one asset and purchase of another. This catches a lot of people by surprise.
Is that true even for transactions that happened before they became a permanent resident? I thought you only had to worry about US taxes once you actually became a resident.
Yuki Sato
Don't forget that if you go the OIC route, they will look at your earning potential, not just current earnings. My brother tried to do an OIC and got rejected because even though he was making little money at the time, he had a degree and work history that suggested he could earn more in the future. They calculated his potential earnings over 4-5 years and determined he could pay the full amount eventually. Also, make sure you've filed ALL required tax returns before applying. They automatically reject OICs if you have any unfiled returns for previous years. And you'll need to be current on estimated tax payments for the current year too.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
ā¢Thank you for this insight - that's really helpful to know about them looking at earning potential. I have a question though - my earning history has been inconsistent because of contract work, with some years much higher than others. Will they just look at my highest earning year and assume that's my potential? Or do they take into account the volatile nature of contract work?
0 coins
Yuki Sato
ā¢They typically look at an average of your recent years, but they'll definitely take into account your highest earning years as an indication of what you're capable of earning. However, if you can document that the contract work was irregular or that the industry has changed (especially with the company going bankrupt), that can help your case. Make sure to thoroughly document why your past income isn't representative of future earnings. Include any industry changes, health issues, or other factors that limit your earning potential going forward. The more documentation you provide showing why your situation has permanently changed, the better your chances of having them accept a reduced earning potential calculation.
0 coins
Carmen Flores
I successfully completed an OIC last year and paid only about 22% of what I owed. Here's what worked for me: 1) I applied for "doubt as to collectibility" since I couldn't pay the full amount 2) I made sure to calculate a reasonable offer (monthly disposable income Ć 12 + assets equity) 3) I included a detailed letter explaining exactly why I couldn't pay 4) Most importantly, I CONTINUED making my monthly payments while the OIC was being processed For the Head of Household question - yes, you can claim your college student if they lived with you for more than half the year (dorm time counts as living with you temporarily) AND if you provided more than half their support. But honestly, changing filing status now won't affect your back taxes - it'll only help going forward.
0 coins
Andre Dubois
ā¢Did you use a tax professional or do it yourself? I've been watching YouTube videos about the OIC process but everyone makes it seem so complicated. How long did the whole process take from application to acceptance?
0 coins
Carmen Flores
ā¢I did it myself, though I spent about 3 weeks researching and preparing before submitting. It's definitely complicated but doable if you're organized. The whole process took about 9 months from submission to final acceptance. The key was being extremely thorough with the financial information and documentation. I literally sent them a binder with everything tabbed and indexed. The IRS assigned an offer examiner who called me twice to clarify some expenses, but otherwise the process was mostly waiting. When I got the acceptance letter, I paid the agreed amount within a week, and they released the federal tax lien about 30 days later. Just be prepared for a lot of paperwork and patience!
0 coins