


Ask the community...
Just a heads up - I tried doing MFS in California (community property state) using Free Fillable Forms last year and ended up filing on paper because I couldn't get past the verification errors. This year I did successfully e-file, but I had to do something a bit different. Instead of entering the W-2s exactly as shown on the forms, I entered them with already-calculated 50% amounts. So if my spouse's W-2 showed $80,000 in wages and $15,000 in withholding, I entered a W-2 for them showing $40,000 and $7,500 on my return. It felt wrong doing it this way since it doesn't match the actual W-2, but Form 8958 properly showed the allocation, and the verification passed with this method. Just another option if you're struggling with the override approach.
Isn't that technically incorrect though? I thought you're supposed to report the full W-2 amounts exactly as they appear on the forms, then use Form 8958 to show the allocation. Wouldn't entering modified amounts on the W-2 entries potentially cause issues?
You're absolutely right that it's not the technically correct way to do it. The proper way is to enter the W-2s as they appear and then use Form 8958 to allocate. However, Free Fillable Forms has this verification issue that prevents many people from e-filing when done the correct way. It's one of those situations where the system limitation forces a workaround. The important thing is that the final tax calculation is correct and Form 8958 properly shows the community property allocation. I spoke with a tax professional before doing it this way, and they said that as long as Form 8958 is included and properly shows how you derived your numbers, it should be fine. The IRS is ultimately looking at your taxable income, withholding, and whether you've properly split community property income.
Has anyone tried paper filing instead? After struggling with FFF for weeks last year (California MFS), I just printed everything out and mailed it. Took forever to get my refund but at least I didn't have to deal with the verification errors.
Paper filing works but it's sooo slow right now. I paper filed my MFS return from Washington state last year and it took almost 7 months to get my refund. The IRS is still catching up on their backlog.
Something people haven't mentioned yet - make sure you're using the correct business code on your Schedule C! Since this is just a bonus payment, you should probably use code 711510 (Independent artists, writers, and performers) or something similar. Also, make sure you're tracking your estimated tax payments for next year. When you get 1099 income without tax withholding, you might need to make quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid penalties. For a one-time bonus it might not matter, but it's good to know!
Estimated tax payments? Ugh, this is getting more complicated by the minute! My bonus was about $8,500 - do I really need to worry about estimated payments for next year? I thought that was only for people who are actually self-employed year-round.
For a one-time payment of $8,500, you probably don't need to worry about estimated payments for next year. The requirement typically kicks in if you expect to owe $1,000 or more in taxes when you file. Since this was just a one-time thing and not ongoing self-employment income, you should be fine without making estimated payments. Just be prepared that you'll owe both income tax and self-employment tax (about 15.3%) on that bonus amount when you file. If possible, set aside roughly 25-30% of the bonus amount for taxes so you're not caught off guard when you file.
Has anyone else had their employer incorrectly issue a 1099-NEC for what clearly should have been W-2 income? I'm pretty sure sign-on bonuses should typically be on your W-2, not a 1099. Might be worth asking your employer about this because it could be a mistake?
This happens more often than you'd think. Companies sometimes try to save on their portion of employment taxes by incorrectly classifying employees as contractors. A sign-on bonus for a regular employment position should usually be on a W-2. If it's a substantial amount, it might be worth asking your HR or payroll department to correct it. But keep in mind that if you push back, they might get defensive since fixing it would cost them money.
One thing to consider with these lead fee arrangements is whether the fee is truly for lead generation or if it's a revenue split. The distinction matters for tax reporting. True lead generation fees (where you pay for being connected to a client) are service payments requiring a 1099. But if you're operating under a revenue-sharing agreement where they're essentially a partner in the business relationship, the reporting requirements might differ. I learned this the hard way when the IRS questioned our reporting of fees that were actually structured as commission splits. Worth looking at the exact language in your agreement.
That's a really good point I hadn't considered. Looking back at our contract, it specifically describes the fee as "payment for client acquisition services" rather than a revenue share. Would that language definitely make it a service requiring a 1099?
Based on that contract language, yes, it would most likely be considered a payment for services that requires a 1099. When the contract specifically calls it "payment for client acquisition services," the IRS would typically view that as you purchasing a service from them. If it were structured as a revenue split or commission arrangement, the contract would usually contain language about "shared revenue" or "commission splits" and might include different terms about the business relationship. The specific language in contracts really matters when determining tax reporting requirements, so you're on the right track focusing on those exact terms.
Am I the only one who's CPA handles all this? š I just forward these types of questions to my accountant and they figure it out. Last year we had like 17 different lead generators and marketing partners with various fee structures and my CPA sorted it all out.
Not everyone can afford a CPA, especially small businesses just starting out. I do my own taxes to save money and questions like this are really important for DIY tax filers.
That's a fair point. I didn't mean to sound dismissive. I started doing my own taxes too but switched to a CPA once these business relationships got complicated. For DIY filers, I think the main thing is documenting everything clearly - get those W-9s from anyone you pay, track all payments meticulously, and maybe consider investing in good accounting software that flags when you need to issue 1099s. The peace of mind is worth it, even if you're handling tax filing yourself.
One thing nobody mentioned - if you're doing renovations before renting, keep EXTREMELY detailed records of everything. Take before and after photos of all work done. I got audited last year specifically on my rental property improvements and had to prove which were repairs vs capital improvements. The difference in tax treatment is huge.
What counts as "detailed records"? I've been keeping receipts but not much else. Should I be doing more?
Receipts are a good start, but you should also note exactly what each expense was for. Create a spreadsheet that categorizes everything as either a repair or improvement. Take dated photos before, during, and after major work. Keep copies of contracts with any contractors. For example, don't just have a receipt that says "bathroom work - $3,500." Have documentation showing it was a complete bathroom remodel with new fixtures, tile, etc. This makes it clear it's a capital improvement rather than a repair. The IRS can get very picky about what qualifies as an immediate deduction versus what must be depreciated.
Has anyone used TurboTax for reporting rental property? I've used it for years for my personal taxes but never for a rental. Not sure if it can handle all the depreciation and improvement tracking properly.
Jamal Anderson
I went through this exact situation with my mom. If you're under 24, not married, and don't have children, it's really hard to be considered independent for FAFSA unless you can prove something extreme like abandonment. But here's what worked for me: 1) I scheduled a personal meeting with my financial aid counselor and brought ALL my documentation showing the situation 2) Had my older sister (who experienced the same thing) write a letter confirming this was a pattern 3) Got my therapist to write a letter about the financial manipulation 4) Brought communications showing my stepdad refusing to file taxes They ended up approving a Professional Judgment adjustment which helped me qualify for more financial aid even though I couldn't get fully independent status. It's worth fighting for! The financial aid office has more flexibility than they initially let on.
0 coins
Mei Wong
ā¢Did you have to pay for the therapist letter? I'm in a similar situation but can't afford therapy right now.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
ā¢I didn't have to pay specifically for the letter. My therapist wrote it as part of my ongoing treatment. If you can't afford therapy, see if your school has counseling services - they're usually free or very low cost for students. School counselors can often provide similar documentation. Many schools also have legal aid services for students that can help you draft affidavits or formal statements about your situation. Church leaders, high school teachers who know your situation, or even employers who are familiar with your family circumstances can sometimes provide supporting letters too.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
Has anyone tried just filing FAFSA without parent info and checking the "unable to provide parent information" box? I did that and it let me submit, but I got an email from my school saying I need to follow up with the financial aid office. Wondering if this actually works?
0 coins
Liam McGuire
ā¢I tried that route last year. You can submit the FAFSA that way, but you'll only be eligible for unsubsidized loans unless you get the dependency override approved. Your school's financial aid office will require additional documentation to consider you for grants or subsidized loans.
0 coins