


Ask the community...
Have you considered asking your grandparents to set up an installment sale? This can be really tax-efficient for both sides. They can spread out any capital gains over multiple years instead of getting hit all at once, and you don't have to worry about gift tax implications. You'd basically set up a private mortgage where you pay them monthly over time (with interest - the IRS requires at least their minimum rate). The advantage is you can set this up with a very small down payment if cash flow is tight as a student. Property taxes still might get reassessed though, depending on your state. But this approach often feels more like a "real" transaction to everyone involved rather than a gift.
Doesn't this still require them to charge market rate interest though? And wouldn't the OP still need to qualify for the mortgage with their limited student income? I'm curious how this would work practically.
The IRS only requires what's called the Applicable Federal Rate (AFR) for family loans, which is typically much lower than market mortgage rates - sometimes less than half. In January 2025, the long-term AFR is only around 3.4% while market mortgage rates are over 6%. Regarding qualification, that's the beauty of a private family loan - there's no formal qualification process like with a bank. The grandparents can set whatever terms they're comfortable with based on their knowledge of the grandchild's situation and future earning potential. Many families set up lower payments during school years with a balloon adjustment after graduation when income increases. The biggest tax advantage is that the grandparents can spread any capital gains across multiple years rather than recognizing it all in one tax year, potentially keeping them in a lower tax bracket. Meanwhile, the grandchild can still deduct the mortgage interest just like with a traditional mortgage.
Has anyone mentioned the step-up in basis consideration? If your grandparents are quite elderly (sorry to be blunt), it might actually be more tax-efficient for them to keep the property until they pass away. When property transfers through inheritance, it gets a "step-up" in basis to the fair market value at date of death, which eliminates all the built-up capital gains. This could save tens or even hundreds of thousands in taxes compared to a gift or below-market sale during their lifetime. It's a morbid calculation, but sometimes the most tax-efficient transfer method is through an estate. You could potentially rent the property from them in the meantime if you want to live there.
Couldn't they just use a life estate deed? That way the grandparents retain the right to live in the property until death, but ownership transfers automatically at death - getting the step-up in basis benefit while still guaranteeing the property goes to the grandchild?
A life estate deed is definitely worth considering, but it has some limitations. While it does allow for the step-up in basis at death and avoids probate, there are a few important considerations: The grandparents in this case don't actually live in the property (OP mentioned it's their "2nd house"), so a traditional life estate might not make sense. Instead, they might consider a remainder interest deed with retained right of sale, which would still provide the step-up in basis while giving them flexibility. Another potential issue is that creating a life estate now could trigger gift tax consequences on the remainder interest (the portion effectively being given to the grandchild). The IRS has specific formulas to calculate the present value of that remainder interest based on the life expectant's age. Also worth noting that with a life estate, the original owners can't sell or mortgage the property without the remainder beneficiary's consent, which may or may not be desirable depending on the grandparents' future needs.
One other thing to consider - if you're claiming your parents as dependents, make sure you're keeping good records of how you're supporting them! My sister got audited last year after claiming our mom (similar situation, only SS income). The IRS wanted proof she provided >50% of support. She had to show rent payments, utility bills, grocery receipts, medical expenses, etc. Just having them live with you isn't enough documentation alone!
Just double check that your parents aren't required to file for other reasons! My dad was in a similar situation but forgot he had sold some stock that year (literally like $200 worth) and that triggered a filing requirement even though his Social Security wasn't taxable. The IRS computers automatically cross-reference all those 1099 forms so they'll know if there's any additional income. Better to check thoroughly than get a surprise letter later!
This happened to my grandma too! She had like $20 in dividend income from some ancient account she forgot about and it caused such a headache with the IRS. They're really strict about everything being reported properly.
19 Don't forget about keeping a detailed gambling diary/log! In addition to the statements others mentioned, the IRS actually expects you to maintain a contemporaneous log of your gambling activity. Include: - Date and type of gambling - Name and address of gambling establishment - Names of other people with you when gambling (if applicable) - Amount won or lost I learned this the hard way during an audit a few years back. Even with casino statements, they wanted to see my personal records too. Start keeping one now for any future gambling, and try to reconstruct as best you can for this year!
3 Is there a specific format the IRS requires for this gambling log? Can I just create a spreadsheet or do they want something more formal? Seems like a lot of work to track every single bet.
19 There's no official IRS form for the gambling log, so a spreadsheet works perfectly fine. The key is consistency and detail. For occasional gamblers, it's not too burdensome, but I understand it can be a lot if you gamble frequently. For high-volume bettors like sports gamblers, most online platforms allow you to download your complete betting history, which the IRS will generally accept if it contains the necessary details. The personal log becomes more important for cash games and situations where electronic records aren't automatically generated. The IRS mainly wants to see that you're tracking your activity in a systematic way.
11 Just an important point nobody's mentioned - those W-2G forms from the raffle will be reported directly to the IRS, but your losses won't be unless you report them. Make absolutely sure your reported winnings match what's on the W-2G exactly, or you'll get an automatic mismatch letter from the IRS. Also, I found out last year that even if you itemize and deduct all your losses, the full amount of your gambling winnings still counts toward your AGI (Adjusted Gross Income), which can affect things like your Medicare premiums, social security taxation, and various tax credits. Something to be aware of!
25 Wait, so you're saying even if I deduct $15k in losses against my $82k win, my AGI still goes up by the full $82k? That seems really unfair!
Just wanted to add my two cents as someone who's been filing Schedule C for my side business for 7 years. The "at risk" question confused me too at first, but it's really aimed at catching people involved in tax shelters. For regular small business owners (Etsy, freelancing, consulting, etc.), your investment is almost always "at risk" because you could lose the money you put in. The only time you'd answer "No" is if you have some arrangement where someone else guaranteed your investment or where you're not personally liable for business debts beyond your initial investment (like certain limited partnerships). If you put your own money in and could lose it if the business fails, just check "Yes" and move on!
What about equipment I bought for my business that I could still sell if the business fails? Is that still considered "at risk"?
Yes, that equipment is still considered "at risk" even if you could potentially sell it later. The question is really asking if you could potentially lose the money you invested, not if you definitely will lose it. For example, if you bought a $2,000 computer for your business, it starts depreciating immediately and you might only get $800 if you had to sell it used. That potential for loss makes it "at risk." The IRS is trying to distinguish normal business investments from certain tax shelter arrangements where investors are protected from any possibility of loss.
Just wanted to throw in my experience. Last year I messed up and left line 32 blank on my Schedule C because I didn't understand it. Got a letter from the IRS about 3 months later asking me to clarify. Wasn't a big deal - just had to respond saying "Yes" all investments were at risk (since I just had a simple freelance writing business with my laptop and some software). But it delayed my refund by about 6 weeks, so definitely worth just answering it correctly the first time!
Did you have to file an amended return or was just responding to the letter enough?
Makayla Shoemaker
One thing to consider is that if you sell items for LESS than you paid for them originally (which is almost certainly the case with used clothing), there's no profit to tax. Personal items sold at a loss aren't taxable. The 1099-K just reports the gross amount you received - it doesn't mean that whole amount is taxable. Think of it like selling your used car for less than you paid - no taxes owed even though it might be a significant amount of money.
0 coins
Christian Bierman
ā¢But how do you PROVE you sold for less than you paid when you don't have receipts for clothes you bought years ago? Seems like the IRS could just assume it was all profit.
0 coins
Makayla Shoemaker
ā¢You don't necessarily need original receipts. The IRS understands that people don't keep receipts for clothing purchases from years ago. You can make reasonable estimates based on the type and brand of clothing. For example, if you sold a Nike hoodie for $30, you could reasonably estimate you paid $60-70 for it new. Document your estimates in a spreadsheet with descriptions of each item. The burden of proof for personal items sold casually isn't as high as for business inventory. Just be reasonable and consistent in your approach.
0 coins
Emma Olsen
Has anyone else noticed that these marketplaces are counting shipping fees in the 1099-K total? So unfair because that money just passes through to the shipping company!
0 coins
Lucas Lindsey
ā¢Yep, happened to me too. But you can deduct the shipping costs as expenses on Schedule C. Just keep track of what you spent on shipping for each item. I created a simple spreadsheet with item sold, sale price, shipping cost, and estimated original purchase price.
0 coins